regrading
简明释义
v. 将……重新分级(regrade 的现在分词)
英英释义
单词用法
重新评分考试 | |
重新评分作业 | |
重新评分政策 | |
重新评分流程 |
同义词
反义词
降级 | The degrading conditions of the environment are a concern for future generations. | 环境的降级状况是对未来几代人的担忧。 | |
恶化 | The company's reputation is deteriorating due to poor customer service. | 由于糟糕的客户服务,公司声誉正在恶化。 |
例句
1.Remedies for damp or wet basements can be as simple as rerouting downspouts, regrading slopes away from foundation walls, or applying water-resistant paints to interior surfaces.
补救潮湿或返潮的地下室可以像重新排布落水管一样简单,重整斜坡让它远离基墙,或者在内墙刷防水涂料。
2.Remedies for damp or wet basements can be as simple as rerouting downspouts, regrading slopes away from foundation walls, or applying water-resistant paints to interior surfaces.
补救潮湿或返潮的地下室可以像重新排布落水管一样简单,重整斜坡让它远离基墙,或者在内墙刷防水涂料。
3.Due to a new policy, all projects will undergo regrading to align with updated standards.
由于新政策,所有项目将进行重新评分以符合更新的标准。
4.The student requested regrading of their paper after discovering a grading mistake.
学生在发现评分错误后请求对他们的论文进行重新评分。
5.The committee is responsible for regrading applications that were previously rejected.
委员会负责对之前被拒绝的申请进行重新评分。
6.The teacher is considering regrading the exams to ensure fairness among students.
老师正在考虑重新评分考试,以确保学生之间的公平。
7.After reviewing the assignments, the professor decided on regrading some of them due to errors in the initial evaluation.
在审查作业后,教授决定对其中一些作业进行重新评分,因为初次评估中存在错误。
作文
In the academic world, assessments play a crucial role in determining a student's understanding and mastery of a subject. However, there are instances when students feel that their work has not been evaluated fairly. In such cases, the process of regrading (重新评分) becomes essential. This process allows students to appeal for a reassessment of their work, hoping for a more accurate evaluation that reflects their true capabilities.The concept of regrading (重新评分) is significant because it promotes fairness and transparency in academic evaluations. When students receive grades that they believe do not accurately represent their efforts or understanding, it can be disheartening. This sentiment can lead to a lack of motivation and a decrease in academic performance. Therefore, having a structured process for regrading (重新评分) helps address these concerns and encourages students to engage actively with their educational journey.Moreover, regrading (重新评分) serves as an opportunity for educators to reflect on their grading practices. It encourages instructors to provide clearer guidelines and rubrics for assessment, ensuring that students understand what is expected of them. This can lead to improved teaching methods and a more supportive learning environment.However, the process of regrading (重新评分) should be approached with caution. It is important for students to present valid reasons for their request, rather than simply seeking a higher grade out of dissatisfaction. Educators must also handle these requests professionally and impartially, ensuring that their decisions are based on objective criteria rather than personal biases.In my experience, I once submitted a paper that I believed reflected my hard work and research. When I received my grade, I was surprised to find that it was lower than I had anticipated. After reviewing the feedback, I felt that some of the points raised were not entirely fair or reflective of my arguments. I decided to initiate the regrading (重新评分) process, providing a detailed explanation of my concerns and highlighting specific areas where I believed my work was misinterpreted.The outcome of this process was enlightening. My instructor took the time to reevaluate my paper, considering my arguments and the points I had raised. Ultimately, my grade was adjusted to better reflect my efforts. This experience taught me the importance of advocating for oneself and the value of the regrading (重新评分) process in fostering a fair educational environment.In conclusion, regrading (重新评分) is a vital component of the academic assessment process. It not only provides a mechanism for students to seek justice regarding their grades but also encourages educators to refine their evaluation methods. By fostering open communication and transparency, both students and teachers can work together to create a more equitable learning experience. It is essential for institutions to support this process, ensuring that all students feel valued and fairly assessed in their academic endeavors.