impeachment

简明释义

英[ɪmˈpiːtʃmənt]美[ɪmˈpiːtʃmənt]

n. 弹劾；控告；怀疑；指摘

复 数 i m p e a c h m e n t s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.When his boss asked if he was late for work, he admitted the soft impeachment .

当他的老板问他是否迟到时，他承认他是迟到了。

2.Clause 3:The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed;

对一切罪行的审判，除了弹劫案以外，均应由陪审团裁定，并且该审判应在罪案发生的州内举行 ；

3.The twist to the story is that caprese did, in fact, subsequently face impeachment proceedings but, for technical reasons, was granted immunity.

故事的曲折之处于凯普莱斯后来真的面临诉讼，但是，因为技术原因，被豁免了。

4.Unfortunately, our country's court hearing is weak in this, still holding much judge's inquiry in the process of impeachment which is dangerous for court impeachment.

然而，我国目前的刑事庭审就是对抗性不足，依然保留了较为浓厚的法官讯问式色彩，这使庭审质证效果大打折扣。

5.On the way home from Vietnam, I found out that Chuck Ruff, my White House counsel during the impeachment proceeding, had died suddenly.

从越南回家的途中，我得知，我在弹劾事件中的白宫法律顾问查克·拉夫突然辞世。

6.When Erskine asked Newt why they would proceed with impeachment instead of other possible remedies such as censure or reprimand, the Speaker replied, Because we can.

当厄斯金问金里奇为何不采用如公开谴责或训斥等可行的办法时，这位众议院议长的回答是：“因为我们能做到。”

7.Clause 3:The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed;

对一切罪行的审判，除了弹劫案以外，均应由陪审团裁定，并且该审判应在罪案发生的州内举行 ；

8.And we need consummate the impeachment rules further to enhance the maneuverability in practice.

同时，法律也应进一步完善质证所需的规则，以增加质证的可操作性。

9.Critics argued that the impeachment 弹劾 was politically motivated.

批评者认为这次弹劾 impeachment是出于政治动机。

10.The senator gave a speech defending the impeachment 弹劾 proceedings.

这位参议员发表演讲为弹劾 impeachment程序辩护。

11.The outcome of the impeachment 弹劾 trial will set a precedent for future cases.

这次弹劾 impeachment审判的结果将为未来的案件树立先例。

12.Many citizens were divided on whether the impeachment 弹劾 was justified.

许多公民对这次弹劾 impeachment是否合理存在分歧。

13.The House of Representatives voted to initiate the impeachment 弹劾 process against the president.

众议院投票决定启动对总统的弹劾 impeachment程序。

作文

The concept of impeachment is one that has been a significant part of political discourse, particularly in democratic nations. Impeachment refers to the process by which a sitting president or other high-ranking officials can be removed from office for misconduct. This mechanism serves as a crucial check on power, ensuring that leaders remain accountable to the people they serve. The roots of impeachment can be traced back to English common law, where it was initially used to hold officials accountable for abuses of power. In the United States, the Founding Fathers incorporated impeachment into the Constitution as a way to prevent tyranny and protect democracy.One of the most notable cases of impeachment in American history was that of President Bill Clinton in the late 1990s. Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice related to his extramarital affair with Monica Lewinsky. Although he was acquitted by the Senate and completed his term, the impeachment proceedings had a lasting impact on American politics. It highlighted the highly polarized nature of U.S. politics and raised questions about the standards for impeachment.Another significant event was the impeachment of President Donald Trump. He was impeached twice during his presidency—first in 2019 over allegations of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress related to his dealings with Ukraine, and again in 2021 for incitement of insurrection following the Capitol riot. These events not only tested the resilience of American democratic institutions but also sparked intense debates about the criteria and implications of impeachment. Critics argued that the impeachment process had become overly politicized, while supporters maintained that it was essential for upholding the rule of law.The impeachment process itself involves several steps. The House of Representatives must first draft articles of impeachment, which outline the charges against the official. A simple majority vote in the House is required to proceed with impeachment. If successful, the case moves to the Senate, where a trial is held. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presides over the trial in the case of a presidential impeachment. A two-thirds majority vote in the Senate is needed to convict and remove the official from office.The implications of impeachment extend beyond the immediate political landscape. It raises important questions about governance, accountability, and the balance of power within the government. The threat of impeachment can deter officials from engaging in unethical behavior, knowing that their actions are subject to scrutiny. However, the potential for impeachment can also lead to political maneuvering, where parties may use the threat of impeachment as a tool against opponents.In conclusion, impeachment is a powerful mechanism within democratic systems that serves to uphold accountability and integrity among public officials. While it is a necessary tool for maintaining the rule of law, it also carries with it the potential for political strife and division. Understanding the complexities of impeachment is essential for any citizen engaged in the democratic process, as it reflects the ongoing struggle to balance power and accountability in governance.

“弹劾”这一概念在政治话语中占有重要地位，尤其是在民主国家中。“弹劾”是指对现任总统或其他高级官员因不当行为而进行的罢免程序。这一机制作为权力的重要制衡，确保领导人对其所服务的人民保持问责。“弹劾”的根源可以追溯到英国普通法，最初用于追究官员滥用权力的责任。在美国，开国元勋们将“弹劾”纳入宪法，以防止暴政和保护民主。美国历史上最著名的“弹劾”案例之一是比尔·克林顿总统在1990年代末的事件。克林顿因与莫妮卡·莱温斯基的婚外情而被众议院弹劾，指控包括伪证和妨碍司法。尽管他在参议院被宣判无罪并完成了任期，但这次“弹劾”程序对美国政治产生了持久影响。它突显了美国政治的高度两极化，并引发了关于“弹劾”标准的质疑。另一个重要事件是唐纳德·特朗普总统的“弹劾”。在他的总统任期内，他两次被弹劾——第一次是在2019年，因涉嫌滥用权力和妨碍国会而与乌克兰的交易有关；第二次是在2021年，因煽动叛乱而被弹劾，紧随国会大厦骚乱之后。这些事件不仅考验了美国民主制度的韧性，还引发了关于“弹劾”的标准和影响的激烈辩论。批评者认为“弹劾”程序变得过于政治化，而支持者则坚称这对于维护法治至关重要。“弹劾”程序本身涉及几个步骤。众议院必须首先起草“弹劾”条款，概述对官员的指控。众议院需要简单多数票才能继续进行“弹劾”。如果成功，案件将移交给参议院，在那里进行审判。在总统“弹劾”的情况下，最高法院首席法官主持审判。参议院需要三分之二的多数票才能定罪并将官员罢免。“弹劾”的影响超出了直接的政治格局。它提出了有关治理、问责和政府权力平衡的重要问题。“弹劾”的威胁可以阻止官员从事不道德行为，因为他们知道自己的行为受到审查。然而，“弹劾”的潜在可能性也可能导致政治操弄，各方可能利用“弹劾”的威胁作为对抗对手的工具。总之，“弹劾”是民主制度内一种强有力的机制，有助于维护公共官员的问责和诚信。虽然它是维护法治的必要工具，但也带来了政治冲突和分裂的潜力。理解“弹劾”的复杂性对于任何参与民主过程的公民来说都是至关重要的，因为它反映了在治理中平衡权力和问责之间的持续斗争。