hierarchical

简明释义

英[ˌhaɪəˈrɑːkɪk(ə)l]美[ˌhaɪəˈrɑːrkɪkl]

adj. 分等级的，等级制度的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.When teams consist of experienced employees from hierarchical organizations, who have been conditioned to traditional organizational culture, cooperation may not occur naturally.

当阶级组织内经验丰富的员工组成团队时，他们已经习惯于传统的组织文化，合作可能不会自然地发生。

2.Although internally the XML is stored in a hierarchical format, logically in the database table it appears to be stored in a CLOB or BLOB.

尽管XML在内部存储为层次化格式，但逻辑上，在数据库表中，它似乎存储在CLOB或 BLOB中。

3.This is certainly a little difficult for people who are more used to a hierarchical system.

这对于习惯于等级制度的人来说有点困难。

4.It was also hierarchical and distributed.

它也是分级和分布式的。

5.When teams consist of experienced employees from hierarchical organizations who have been conditioned to traditional organizational culture, cooperation may not occur naturally.

如果团队由多层级部门的老员工组成，由于这些人已经习惯了传统的组织文化，因此协作可能不会自然发生。

6.Seven hierarchical exercises were designed to improve aural phonetic reception in these children.

七个层次练习是为了改善这些孩子的听觉语音接收能力。

7.Figure 2 illustrates a possible hierarchical KB structure.

图2演示一个层次化的知识库结构。

8.Improvement of hierarchical controllers.

分等级控制器的改进。

9.In a hierarchical organization, decisions often flow from the top down.

在一个等级制的组织中，决策通常是从上到下流动的。

10.The hierarchical nature of the military requires strict adherence to orders.

军队的等级制度要求严格遵守命令。

11.Many educational institutions have a hierarchical system for faculty positions.

许多教育机构对教职员工职位有一个等级分明的系统。

12.The company's structure is very hierarchical, with clear levels of authority.

公司的结构非常等级分明，具有明确的权力层级。

13.In a hierarchical society, social status can greatly influence one's opportunities.

在一个等级分明的社会中，社会地位可以极大地影响一个人的机会。

作文

In today's complex world, organizations and societies often function in a structured manner. One of the most common structures we encounter is the hierarchical (层级的) system. This structure is characterized by a clear chain of command and distinct levels of authority, which can be found in various contexts, including businesses, governments, and even social groups.To illustrate the significance of hierarchical (层级的) systems, let us consider a typical corporate organization. At the top of the hierarchy, we have the executive team, comprising the CEO and other high-ranking officials who are responsible for making strategic decisions that impact the entire company. Below them are middle managers who oversee specific departments, such as marketing, finance, and human resources. Finally, at the base of this hierarchical (层级的) structure, we find employees who carry out day-to-day operations and tasks.The advantage of a hierarchical (层级的) structure is that it provides clarity and order within an organization. Employees understand their roles, responsibilities, and whom to report to, which can lead to increased efficiency and productivity. Additionally, having a defined chain of command helps in decision-making processes, as it allows for accountability and ensures that decisions are made by those with the appropriate authority and expertise.However, there are drawbacks to a strictly hierarchical (层级的) system. For instance, it can create barriers to communication between different levels of the organization. Employees at the lower levels may feel disconnected from the decision-making process, leading to a lack of motivation and engagement. Furthermore, a rigid hierarchical (层级的) structure may stifle creativity and innovation, as individuals may be less likely to share their ideas if they feel that their voices are not valued.In contrast, some organizations adopt a more flat or decentralized approach, which diminishes the traditional hierarchical (层级的) model. In these environments, employees are encouraged to collaborate and communicate freely across all levels, fostering a sense of teamwork and collective problem-solving. This can lead to enhanced creativity, as diverse perspectives are considered and valued.Nevertheless, it is essential to recognize that both hierarchical (层级的) and flat structures have their merits and limitations. The effectiveness of either model often depends on the organization's goals, culture, and the nature of its work. For example, industries that require strict compliance with regulations, such as healthcare or finance, may benefit from a more hierarchical (层级的) approach to ensure safety and adherence to laws. On the other hand, creative industries, such as technology or design, may thrive in a less hierarchical (层级的) environment, where innovation is key.Ultimately, understanding the implications of hierarchical (层级的) structures allows leaders to make informed decisions about how to organize their teams effectively. By striking a balance between maintaining order and encouraging open communication, organizations can create a work environment that maximizes both efficiency and employee satisfaction. Therefore, whether one chooses to embrace a hierarchical (层级的) model or opts for a more egalitarian approach, the goal should always be to foster a culture of collaboration, respect, and shared purpose among all members of the organization.

在当今复杂的世界中，组织和社会通常以结构化的方式运作。我们所遇到的最常见的结构之一是hierarchical（层级的）系统。这种结构的特点是明确的指挥链和不同级别的权威，这可以在各种背景下找到，包括企业、政府，甚至社会团体。为了说明hierarchical（层级的）系统的重要性，让我们考虑一个典型的企业组织。在层级的顶端，我们有执行团队，由首席执行官和其他高层官员组成，他们负责做出影响整个公司的战略决策。在他们下面是中层管理者，他们监督特定的部门，如市场营销、财务和人力资源。最后，在这个hierarchical（层级的）结构的基础上，我们发现员工，他们负责日常运营和任务。Hierarchical（层级的）结构的优点是它为组织内提供了清晰和秩序。员工了解自己的角色、职责以及向谁报告，这可以提高效率和生产力。此外，拥有明确的指挥链有助于决策过程，因为它允许问责制，并确保由具有适当权威和专业知识的人做出决策。然而，严格的hierarchical（层级的）系统也存在缺点。例如，它可能会在组织的不同层级之间造成沟通障碍。处于较低层级的员工可能会感到与决策过程脱节，导致缺乏动力和参与感。此外，僵化的hierarchical（层级的）结构可能会抑制创造力和创新，因为个人可能不太愿意分享他们的想法，如果他们觉得自己的声音不被重视。相比之下，一些组织采用更平坦或去中心化的方法，从而减少传统的hierarchical（层级的）模型。在这些环境中，鼓励员工在各个层面自由合作和沟通，促进团队合作和集体问题解决。这可以增强创造力，因为多样化的观点被考虑和重视。尽管如此，必须认识到，hierarchical（层级的）和扁平结构都有其优点和局限性。任何一种模型的有效性往往取决于组织的目标、文化和工作性质。例如，需要严格遵守法规的行业，如医疗保健或金融，可能受益于更hierarchical（层级的）的方法，以确保安全和遵守法律。另一方面，技术或设计等创意行业，可能在一个较少hierarchical（层级的）环境中蓬勃发展，在这种环境中，创新是关键。最终，理解hierarchical（层级的）结构的影响使领导者能够就如何有效地组织团队做出明智的决策。通过在维持秩序和鼓励开放沟通之间找到平衡，组织可以创造一个最大化效率和员工满意度的工作环境。因此，无论选择拥抱hierarchical（层级的）模型还是选择更平等的方法，目标始终应该是促进组织所有成员之间的合作、尊重和共同目标的文化。