unpersuasive
简明释义
英[ʌnˈpɜr.sweɪ.sɪv]美[ʌnˈpɜr.sweɪ.sɪv]
adj. 无说服力的
英英释义
没有说服或劝说的能力。 |
单词用法
同义词
反义词
有说服力的 | The speaker gave a persuasive argument that swayed the audience. | 演讲者提出了一个有说服力的论点,打动了观众。 | |
令人信服的 | 她令人信服的证据导致了政策的改变。 | ||
引人注目的 | The compelling story kept everyone on the edge of their seats. | 这个引人注目的故事让每个人都屏息以待。 |
例句
1.Unfortunately for Mr Sevier, the courts in Florida and Utah, found his legal arguments unpersuasive.
不幸的是,佛罗里达州和犹他州法院都认为塞维尔的理由不充分。
2.The occurrence and the existences of these problems indicate that the appraisal system of our country has not yet forms a state of ordered, and the appraisal result is also unpersuasive.
这些问题的存在和发生,表明我国的资产评估系统尚未形成一种有序的状态,由此产生的评估结果也难以令人信服。
3.This article has employed an unconvincing argument in order to prove an unpersuasive point, which is not most appealing to the readers.
这篇文章用说服力不强的论证试图来证明一个缺乏说服力的论点,反而找人反感。
4.He travelled through Manhattan and Queens, making large-scale, exquisitely printed color photographs of some of the most aesthetically unpersuasive streets in New York City.
他在曼哈顿和昆斯走街串巷,拍摄了一些有关纽约街道的彩色大照片,印刷堪称精致,虽然这些街道从美学上看毫无魅力。
5.Whether it's persuasive or unpersuasive.
它是有说服力的,还是没有。
6.The occurrence and the existences of these problems indicate that the appraisal system of our country has not yet forms a state of ordered, and the appraisal result is also unpersuasive.
这些问题的存在和发生,表明我国的资产评估系统尚未形成一种有序的状态,由此产生的评估结果也难以令人信服。
7.Her presentation was unpersuasive, failing to capture the audience's interest.
她的演讲没有说服力,未能吸引观众的兴趣。
8.The report was filled with unpersuasive statistics that did not support the conclusion.
报告中充满了没有说服力的统计数据,没有支持结论。
9.Despite his efforts, the evidence he provided was ultimately unpersuasive.
尽管他努力了,但他提供的证据最终是没有说服力的。
10.Many found the politician's speech unpersuasive and lacking in concrete proposals.
许多人发现这位政治家的演讲没有说服力,缺乏具体的提议。
11.The lawyer's argument was unpersuasive, leaving the jury unconvinced.
律师的辩论显得没有说服力,让陪审团感到不信服。
作文
In today's world, where information is abundant and opinions are diverse, the ability to persuade others is a valuable skill. However, not all arguments are effective; some can be deemed unpersuasive, or lacking in convincing power. Understanding why certain arguments fail to persuade can help individuals improve their communication skills and become more effective in their discussions.To begin with, an argument may be unpersuasive due to a lack of credible evidence. For instance, when someone claims that a particular diet is the best without providing scientific studies or expert testimonials, their argument may fall flat. In academic writing, the importance of supporting claims with reliable sources cannot be overstated. Readers are more likely to be convinced when they see data, statistics, or references from reputable sources. Therefore, when one fails to back up their assertions, their argument becomes unpersuasive.Moreover, the clarity of the argument plays a significant role in its persuasiveness. If a speaker or writer presents convoluted ideas or uses overly complex language, the audience may struggle to grasp the main point. For example, consider a politician who delivers a speech filled with jargon and technical terms that the general public does not understand. As a result, the message may come across as unpersuasive, leaving listeners confused rather than inspired. Effective communication requires simplicity and clarity, ensuring that the audience can easily follow and engage with the argument being presented.Another factor contributing to an argument being unpersuasive is emotional appeal. While emotions can be powerful motivators, relying solely on them without logical reasoning can weaken an argument. For instance, if someone argues against climate change by solely appealing to fear without presenting factual information, their stance may seem exaggerated and unpersuasive. A balanced approach that combines both emotional and rational appeals tends to be more convincing, as it addresses the audience's feelings while also providing solid evidence.Additionally, the speaker's credibility significantly impacts the persuasiveness of their argument. If an individual lacks expertise or has a history of dishonesty, their claims may be viewed as unpersuasive. For instance, a celebrity promoting a health product without any background in nutrition or medicine may not be taken seriously by consumers. Building trust through honesty and demonstrating knowledge in a specific field can greatly enhance one's persuasive abilities.Furthermore, understanding the audience is crucial for effective persuasion. An argument that works well for one group may be completely unpersuasive to another. For example, a marketing campaign aimed at young adults may not resonate with older demographics. Tailoring the message to fit the audience's values, beliefs, and interests is essential for persuasion. Failing to do so can lead to disconnect and make the argument appear irrelevant or unpersuasive.In conclusion, the art of persuasion is complex and requires careful consideration of various elements. Arguments can become unpersuasive due to a lack of credible evidence, unclear communication, overreliance on emotional appeal, diminished credibility, or failure to connect with the audience. By recognizing these pitfalls, individuals can work towards enhancing their persuasive skills, ultimately leading to more impactful and convincing arguments in their personal and professional lives.
在当今这个信息丰富、观点多样的世界中,劝说他人的能力是一项宝贵的技能。然而,并非所有的论点都是有效的;有些论点可以被认为是无说服力的,或者缺乏令人信服的力量。理解某些论点为何未能说服他人,可以帮助个人提高沟通技巧,并在讨论中变得更加有效。首先,由于缺乏可信的证据,论点可能会变得无说服力的。例如,当有人声称某种饮食是最好的而没有提供科学研究或专家证词时,他们的论点可能会失败。在学术写作中,支持主张与可靠来源的重要性不容小觑。当读者看到数据、统计或来自权威来源的参考时,他们更有可能被说服。因此,当一个人未能支持他们的主张时,他们的论点就会变得无说服力的。此外,论点的清晰度在其说服力中也起着重要作用。如果演讲者或作者呈现复杂的思想或使用过于复杂的语言,听众可能会难以理解主要观点。例如,考虑一个政治家发表的演讲,充满了公众无法理解的行话和技术术语。因此,信息可能会显得无说服力的,让听众感到困惑而不是受到启发。有效的沟通需要简单明了,确保听众能够轻松跟随并参与所呈现的论点。导致论点变得无说服力的另一个因素是情感诉求。虽然情感可以是强大的动机,但仅仅依靠情感而没有逻辑推理可能会削弱论点。例如,如果有人通过仅仅诉诸恐惧而反对气候变化,而没有提供事实信息,他们的立场可能显得夸大和无说服力的。一种平衡的方法,结合情感和理性诉求,往往更具说服力,因为它既关注听众的感受,又提供了扎实的证据。此外,演讲者的可信度显著影响他们论点的说服力。如果一个人缺乏专业知识或有不诚实的历史,他们的主张可能会被视为无说服力的。例如,一个没有营养或医学背景的名人推广健康产品,消费者可能不会认真对待。通过诚实和展示特定领域的知识来建立信任,可以极大地增强一个人的说服能力。此外,了解听众对于有效的劝说至关重要。适用于一组的论点可能对另一组完全无说服力的。例如,针对年轻成年人群体的营销活动可能无法引起老年群体的共鸣。根据听众的价值观、信仰和兴趣量身定制信息,对于劝说至关重要。如果未能做到这一点,可能会导致脱节,使论点显得无关紧要或无说服力的。总之,劝说的艺术是复杂的,需要仔细考虑各种元素。由于缺乏可信的证据、不清晰的沟通、过度依赖情感诉求、可信度下降或未能与听众联系,论点可能会变得无说服力的。通过认识到这些陷阱,个人可以努力提升他们的说服技巧,最终在个人和职业生活中形成更具影响力和说服力的论点。