stovepipe
简明释义
n. 大礼帽;火炉烟囱
adj. 瘦裤腿的
英英释义
单词用法
高顶帽 | |
烟囱 | |
独立系统 | |
垂直组织 |
同义词
烟囱 | 烟囱在冬天之前需要清理。 | ||
烟道 | 点火时确保烟道是打开的。 | ||
管道 | 管道将废气从发动机排出。 |
反义词
协作 | Collaboration between departments can lead to more innovative solutions. | 部门之间的协作可以带来更具创新性的解决方案。 | |
整合 | 系统的整合对高效工作流程至关重要。 |
例句
1.Once his stovepipe was raised and the stakes driven in, he opened the low wooden door for his wife, Norvoo; their baby boy, Ulaka; and their six-year-old daughter, Anuka.
在烟囱和木桩都运送进屋之后,奥奇古打开了低矮的木门,跟着进屋的是他的妻子诺乌,小儿子乌拉卡,和六岁的女儿阿奴卡。
2.They're more used to stovepipe kind of thing, and simply, they are not institutionalized to do the services well.
他们更用烟囱这样的事情,只是,他们没有这样做制度化以及服务。
3.He bought an Abraham Lincoln stovepipe hat, added tails and a bow tie, and completed his outfitwith a big, black cigar.
他买了一顶亚伯拉罕罕·林肯大礼帽,穿上燕尾服,又打上领结,全套装备再配上一支大大的黑雪茄。
4.Buy online without formal manufacturers logo "stovepipe socks", not only to prevent stovepipe effect, or even as a "tight" have hurt.
网上购买的无正规厂家标志的“瘦腿袜”,不仅不能达到防病瘦腿的效果,甚至会由于过“紧”而产生伤害。
5.It required military discipline to get us out of bed in a chamber warmed only by the stovepipe, to draw on icy socks and frosty boots and go to milking cows.
把我们从只有烟囱才暖和的房间里的床上叫起来,穿上冰冷的袜子和结了霜的靴子,去挤牛奶,这是有军纪的。
6.Can rely on the treadmill to develop the stovepipe planning?
能否依赖跑步机来制定这个瘦腿规划呢?
7.In the workshop, he stored several lengths of stovepipe for future projects.
在车间里,他存放了几段炉管以备将来的项目使用。
8.The old chimney was made of a rusty stovepipe, which needed to be replaced.
旧烟囱是用生锈的炉管制成的,需要更换。
9.The camping stove required a stovepipe to ensure proper ventilation.
露营炉需要一个炉管以确保适当的通风。
10.During the winter, we used a stovepipe to vent the smoke from our wood stove.
在冬天,我们用炉管将木炉产生的烟气排出。
11.He fashioned a makeshift tent using a stovepipe to create a chimney for the fire.
他用炉管搭建了一个临时帐篷,为火堆创造了一个烟囱。
作文
In the realm of communication and information sharing, the term stovepipe refers to a system or method where information is isolated within specific departments or areas, leading to a lack of collaboration and sharing. This concept is particularly relevant in large organizations, such as government agencies or corporations, where different divisions may operate independently without much interaction with one another. The result is often a fragmented approach to problem-solving and decision-making, as each department may have its own set of data and insights that are not accessible to others. To illustrate the implications of a stovepipe structure, let us consider a hypothetical government agency responsible for public health. Within this agency, there might be separate departments focusing on different aspects of health, such as disease control, nutrition, and mental health. If each department operates in a stovepipe manner, they may collect valuable data and research findings but fail to share this information with one another. For instance, the disease control department may discover a correlation between certain dietary habits and the prevalence of specific diseases. However, if this information is not communicated to the nutrition department, it may not influence public health initiatives aimed at improving dietary practices. The consequences of a stovepipe approach can be detrimental, leading to wasted resources, duplicated efforts, and missed opportunities for comprehensive solutions. In contrast, when departments work collaboratively, they can create a more holistic understanding of issues and develop integrated strategies that address multiple facets of a problem. This collaborative approach can lead to better outcomes, as stakeholders can leverage diverse perspectives and expertise to tackle complex challenges. Moreover, breaking down stovepipe barriers requires intentional effort and strategic planning. Organizations can implement cross-departmental teams, encourage regular communication, and establish shared goals that necessitate collaboration. Technology also plays a crucial role in facilitating information sharing; for example, utilizing centralized databases or collaborative platforms can help ensure that all relevant parties have access to the same information. In conclusion, the concept of stovepipe highlights the importance of collaboration and information sharing in any organization. By recognizing the pitfalls of operating in silos, organizations can take proactive steps to foster communication and collaboration among their departments. This shift not only enhances efficiency but also leads to more effective problem-solving and innovation. Ultimately, embracing a culture of openness and cooperation can transform how organizations function and significantly improve their ability to serve their stakeholders effectively.
在沟通和信息共享的领域,术语stovepipe指的是一种系统或方法,其中信息被孤立在特定部门或领域内,导致缺乏协作和共享。这个概念在大型组织中尤为相关,例如政府机构或公司,不同的部门可能独立运作,彼此之间的互动很少。结果往往是对问题解决和决策的碎片化处理,因为每个部门可能拥有自己的一套数据和见解,而这些信息对其他部门不可获取。为了说明stovepipe结构的影响,让我们考虑一个假设的负责公共卫生的政府机构。在这个机构内,可能有专注于健康不同方面的独立部门,例如疾病控制、营养和心理健康。如果每个部门以stovepipe的方式运作,他们可能收集到有价值的数据和研究结果,但未能相互分享这些信息。例如,疾病控制部门可能发现某些饮食习惯与特定疾病的流行之间存在相关性。然而,如果这一信息未能传达给营养部门,它可能不会影响旨在改善饮食习惯的公共卫生倡议。stovepipe方法的后果可能是有害的,导致资源浪费、重复工作和错失全面解决方案的机会。相比之下,当各部门协同工作时,他们可以对问题形成更全面的理解,并制定出解决多方面问题的综合策略。这种协作方法可以带来更好的结果,因为利益相关者能够利用多样化的视角和专业知识来应对复杂挑战。此外,打破stovepipe障碍需要有意的努力和战略规划。组织可以实施跨部门团队,鼓励定期沟通,并建立需要协作的共同目标。技术在促进信息共享方面也发挥着至关重要的作用;例如,利用集中数据库或协作平台可以帮助确保所有相关方都能访问相同的信息。总之,stovepipe的概念强调了协作和信息共享在任何组织中的重要性。通过认识到在孤岛中运作的陷阱,组织可以采取主动措施来促进各部门之间的沟通和协作。这一转变不仅提高了效率,还导致更有效的问题解决和创新。最终,拥抱开放和合作的文化可以改变组织的运作方式,并显著提高其有效服务利益相关者的能力。