disputatious
简明释义
英[ˌdɪspjəˈteɪʃəs]美[ˌdɪspjuːˈteɪʃəs]
adj. 爱争辩的
英英释义
喜欢或引起激烈争论或争执的。 | |
具有争论或辩论倾向的特征。 |
单词用法
好争辩的性格 | |
好争辩的态度 | |
好争辩的个人 | |
争论激烈的辩论 |
同义词
好争辩的 | 他在讨论中常被视为好争辩的。 | ||
好争吵的 | 她好争吵的性格让人难以与她相处。 | ||
有争议的 | 这场有争议的辩论持续了几个小时。 | ||
好斗的 | 他好斗的态度使他的朋友们疏远了他。 | ||
好斗的 | The pugnacious boxer was known for his fierce fighting style. | 这位好斗的拳击手以其激烈的打斗风格而闻名。 |
反义词
例句
1.Similarly, Schama wants younger generations to 'pass on the memory of our disputatious liberty' to their descendants.
类似地,沙马希望年轻一代能“传承关于我们引发争论的自由的记忆”给他们的后代。
2.Similarly, Schama wants younger generations to 'pass on the memory of our disputatious liberty' to their descendants.
类似地,沙马希望年轻一代能“传承关于我们引发争论的自由的记忆”给他们的后代。
3.A style described as abrasive and contentious; a disputatious lawyer; a litigious and acrimonious spirit.
被描述成粗糙、好争论的风格;好辩的律师;好辩的、刻薄的灵魂。
4.The meeting turned heated as the disputatious 好争论的 members couldn't agree on the budget allocation.
会议变得激烈,因为那些好争论的成员无法就预算分配达成一致。
5.In a disputatious 好争论的 environment, collaboration can become very challenging.
在一个好争论的环境中,合作可能变得非常具有挑战性。
6.During the debate, his disputatious 好争论的 style made it difficult for others to present their views.
在辩论中,他好争论的风格使其他人很难表达自己的观点。
7.The professor was known for his disputatious 好争论的 lectures that challenged students' assumptions.
这位教授以其好争论的讲座而闻名,这些讲座挑战了学生的假设。
8.Her disputatious 好争论的 nature often led to arguments with her colleagues.
她好争论的性格常常导致与同事之间的争执。
作文
In today's society, it is not uncommon to encounter individuals who are quite disputatious (好争论的) in their interactions. These people thrive on debate and often engage in discussions that can quickly escalate into arguments. While some may view this trait as negative, there are also positive aspects to being disputatious (好争论的). For instance, individuals who enjoy debating can contribute to a lively exchange of ideas, pushing others to think critically and consider different perspectives. However, the challenge arises when disputatious (好争论的) behavior leads to conflict rather than constructive dialogue. In professional environments, for example, a disputatious (好争论的) colleague might dominate meetings, turning what should be collaborative discussions into battlegrounds of opposing views. This can create a toxic atmosphere where team members feel discouraged from sharing their thoughts for fear of being challenged or ridiculed. On the other hand, a healthy level of disputatious (好争论的) discourse can foster innovation and creativity. When team members feel free to express differing opinions, it can lead to more robust solutions and prevent groupthink. The key is finding a balance; encouraging open dialogue while maintaining respect among participants. In educational settings, teachers often encourage disputatious (好争论的) discussions to help students develop critical thinking skills. By engaging in debates, students learn to articulate their thoughts clearly and defend their positions with evidence. This practice prepares them for real-world scenarios where they must navigate complex issues and communicate effectively. Nonetheless, it's essential to recognize when disputatious (好争论的) tendencies become counterproductive. In personal relationships, for instance, constant arguing over trivial matters can strain connections and lead to resentment. It’s important to differentiate between healthy debate and unnecessary contention. Moreover, the rise of social media has amplified disputatious (好争论的) behavior, as platforms provide a space for individuals to voice their opinions to a broader audience. This can sometimes lead to polarized discussions, where people are more focused on winning an argument than understanding differing viewpoints. In such cases, the disputatious (好争论的) nature of online interactions can hinder meaningful communication and create divisions rather than fostering understanding. In conclusion, while being disputatious (好争论的) can have its advantages, it is crucial to approach discussions with an open mind and a willingness to listen. Striking a balance between healthy debate and respectful dialogue can lead to better outcomes in both personal and professional contexts. As we navigate our interactions, let us strive to engage in discussions that enlighten rather than divide, embracing the spirit of inquiry without falling into the trap of needless contention.
在当今社会,遇到一些人在互动中表现得相当disputatious(好争论的)并不罕见。这些人喜欢辩论,常常参与的讨论很快就会升级为争吵。虽然一些人可能将这种特质视为负面,但作为一个disputatious(好争论的)个体也有积极的一面。例如,喜欢辩论的人可以为生动的思想交流做出贡献,推动他人进行批判性思考并考虑不同的观点。然而,当disputatious(好争论的)行为导致冲突而不是建设性对话时,问题就出现了。在专业环境中,例如,一个disputatious(好争论的)同事可能会主导会议,将本应是合作讨论的场合变成对立观点的战场。这可能会造成一种有毒的氛围,让团队成员因为害怕被挑战或嘲笑而感到沮丧,不敢分享自己的想法。另一方面,适度的disputatious(好争论的)讨论可以促进创新和创造力。当团队成员能够自由表达不同意见时,可以产生更强有力的解决方案,并防止集体思维。关键是找到平衡;鼓励开放的对话,同时保持参与者之间的尊重。在教育环境中,教师通常鼓励disputatious(好争论的)讨论,以帮助学生培养批判性思维能力。通过参与辩论,学生学习清晰地表达自己的想法,并用证据支持自己的立场。这种实践为他们在现实世界中处理复杂问题和有效沟通做好准备。尽管如此,重要的是要认识到何时disputatious(好争论的)倾向变得适得其反。在个人关系中,例如,因琐事不断争吵可能会加剧关系紧张,导致怨恨。区分健康辩论和不必要争执是至关重要的。此外,社交媒体的兴起使得disputatious(好争论的)行为更加明显,因为这些平台为个人提供了向更广泛受众表达自己意见的空间。这有时会导致极化的讨论,人们更关注赢得争论而不是理解不同的观点。在这种情况下,网络互动的disputatious(好争论的)性质可能会妨碍有意义的沟通,造成分歧而非促进理解。总之,尽管成为disputatious(好争论的)可能有其优势,但以开放的心态和倾听的意愿参与讨论至关重要。在个人和专业背景中,找到健康辩论与尊重对话之间的平衡可以带来更好的结果。在我们进行互动时,让我们努力参与那些启迪而非分裂的讨论,拥抱探究的精神,而不陷入无谓的争执。