contumacy

简明释义

英[ˈkɒntjʊməsi]美[ˈkɑːntjʊməsi]

n. 拒不服从，抗命；藐视法庭

复 数 c o n t u m a c i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The literature of Shanghai group as a special integer was studied and finalized the design and became an expert thesis of Chinese contumacy literature, which is a matter no more than two decade.

海派文学作为一个具有特殊性的整体被加以研究，定型成为中国现代文学史上的一个专门论题不过是近十几年的事情。

2.The literature of Shanghai group as a special integer was studied and finalized the design and became an expert thesis of Chinese contumacy literature, which is a matter no more than two decade.

海派文学作为一个具有特殊性的整体被加以研究，定型成为中国现代文学史上的一个专门论题不过是近十几年的事情。

3.The lawyer argued that his client's contumacy 不服从 was a result of misunderstanding the legal process.

律师辩称，他的客户的contumacy 不服从是对法律程序误解的结果。

4.The teacher had no choice but to address the student's contumacy 不服从 after repeated warnings.

在多次警告后，老师别无选择，只能处理学生的contumacy 不服从。

5.Her persistent contumacy 抗拒 in following the rules led to her suspension from school.

她在遵守规则方面的持续contumacy 抗拒导致她被学校停学。

6.In cases of contumacy 抗拒, courts may impose fines or other sanctions to compel compliance.

在contumacy 抗拒的情况下，法院可能会施加罚款或其他制裁以强迫遵守。

7.The judge warned the defendant that further acts of contumacy 抗拒法庭命令 would result in harsher penalties.

法官警告被告，如果继续有进一步的contumacy 抗拒法庭命令，将会导致更严厉的惩罚。

作文

In the realm of law and governance, the term contumacy refers to a willful disobedience or refusal to comply with a court order or legal obligation. This concept is not only significant in legal contexts but also resonates deeply in everyday life, where individuals often face the choice between following rules and asserting their independence. Understanding contumacy requires us to explore its implications, consequences, and the moral dilemmas it presents.When we consider the implications of contumacy, it becomes clear that this defiance can lead to serious repercussions. In a legal framework, a person who exhibits contumacy may find themselves facing contempt of court charges, which can result in fines or even imprisonment. Such actions disrupt the order and integrity of the judicial system, making it imperative for individuals to understand the weight of their decisions. The consequences extend beyond legal penalties; they can damage reputations and relationships, leading to isolation and mistrust.Moreover, contumacy often raises questions about the balance between authority and individual rights. In a democratic society, citizens are granted freedoms that allow them to question and challenge laws and regulations. However, when this questioning turns into outright defiance, it can create a rift between the governed and those in power. The tension between obedience and rebellion is a recurring theme in history, as seen in movements for civil rights, where individuals have chosen to resist unjust laws. This resistance can be seen as a form of noble contumacy, driven by the desire for justice and equality.Additionally, the moral dilemmas associated with contumacy are profound. On one hand, individuals may feel compelled to adhere to laws and directives that they believe are unjust or harmful. On the other hand, the act of defiance can lead to chaos and disorder, undermining the very fabric of society. This paradox poses a challenging question: when is it justifiable to engage in contumacy? The answer often lies in the context of the situation and the motivations behind the disobedience.In literature and philosophy, contumacy has been explored as a theme that highlights the struggle between individual conscience and societal norms. Characters who embody this trait often serve as catalysts for change, prompting readers to reflect on their own beliefs and values. These narratives remind us that while contumacy can lead to conflict, it can also inspire progress and innovation. The challenge lies in discerning when to stand firm against authority and when to yield for the greater good.In conclusion, contumacy is a complex concept that intertwines legality, morality, and personal conviction. Its presence in our lives serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between order and freedom. As we navigate our own paths, we must consider the implications of our choices, weighing the potential consequences of contumacy against our ethical beliefs. Ultimately, understanding contumacy equips us with the insight necessary to engage thoughtfully with the world around us, fostering a society that values both individual rights and communal harmony.

在法律和治理的领域中，术语contumacy指的是故意的不服从或拒绝遵守法院命令或法律义务。这个概念不仅在法律背景中具有重要意义，而且在日常生活中也深有共鸣，因为个人常常面临遵循规则与主张独立之间的选择。理解contumacy需要我们探索其影响、后果以及所呈现的道德困境。当我们考虑contumacy的影响时，很明显，这种违抗行为可能会导致严重的后果。在法律框架中，表现出contumacy的人可能会面临藐视法庭的指控，这可能导致罚款甚至监禁。这些行为扰乱了司法系统的秩序和完整性，因此个人必须理解他们决策的分量。后果不仅限于法律惩罚；它们可能损害声誉和人际关系，导致孤立和不信任。此外，contumacy常常引发关于权威与个人权利之间平衡的问题。在民主社会中，公民被赋予自由，允许他们质疑和挑战法律与法规。然而，当这种质疑变成公然的违抗时，它可能在被治理者与掌权者之间制造裂痕。服从与反叛之间的紧张关系是历史上反复出现的主题，例如在民权运动中，个人选择抵制不公正的法律。这种抵抗可以被视为一种高尚的contumacy，源于对正义和平等的渴望。此外，与contumacy相关的道德困境是深刻的。一方面，个人可能感到有必要遵守他们认为不公或有害的法律和指令。另一方面，违抗行为可能导致混乱和无序，破坏社会的基本结构。这一悖论提出了一个具有挑战性的问题：何时进行contumacy是可以辩护的？答案往往取决于情境和违抗背后的动机。在文学和哲学中，contumacy作为一种主题被探讨，突显了个人良知与社会规范之间的斗争。体现这一特质的角色通常充当变革的催化剂，促使读者反思自己的信仰和价值观。这些叙事提醒我们，虽然contumacy可能导致冲突，但它也能激励进步和创新。挑战在于辨别何时应坚定地反对权威，何时应为了更大的利益而让步。总之，contumacy是一个复杂的概念，交织着合法性、道德和个人信念。它在我们生活中的存在提醒我们保持秩序与自由之间的微妙平衡。当我们走自己的路时，必须考虑我们选择的影响，权衡contumacy的潜在后果与我们的伦理信仰。最终，理解contumacy使我们具备与周围世界进行深入互动的洞察力，培养一个既重视个人权利又重视共同和谐的社会。