untenability

简明释义

英[ʌnˈtɛnəblɪti]美[ʌnˈtɛnəˌbɪlɪti]

防守不住、站不住脚的性质或状态

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.On the basis of the study of relevant literature and archaeological excavations the author tries to show the untenability of the traditional view.

文献和考古资料证明这种传统观点是不可靠的。

2.On the basis of the study of relevant literature and archaeological excavations the author tries to show the untenability of the traditional view.

文献和考古资料证明这种传统观点是不可靠的。

3.In his report, he pointed out the untenability 不可维持性 of the company's current business model.

在他的报告中，他指出公司的当前商业模式存在untenability 不可维持性。

4.The management had to acknowledge the untenability 不可维持性 of their previous decisions after the financial crisis.

在金融危机后，管理层不得不承认他们之前决策的untenability 不可维持性。

5.As the debate progressed, the untenability 不可维持性 of the opposing viewpoint became increasingly clear.

随着辩论的深入，对立观点的untenability 不可维持性变得愈加明显。

6.The scientist's theory was criticized for its untenability 不可维持性 in light of new evidence.

科学家的理论因新证据而受到批评，认为其存在untenability 不可维持性。

7.The lawyer argued that the evidence presented was so weak that it highlighted the untenability 不可维持性 of the prosecution's case.

律师辩称，提出的证据如此薄弱，以至于突显了控方案件的untenability 不可维持性。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, we often encounter various beliefs and ideologies that shape our understanding of reality. However, there are times when these beliefs become increasingly difficult to defend, leading to a state of untenability. The term untenability refers to the quality of being unable to be maintained or defended against criticism or objection. This concept is particularly relevant in discussions about social issues, scientific theories, and philosophical arguments.Consider the debate surrounding climate change. For years, some individuals have argued against the overwhelming scientific consensus that human activities significantly contribute to global warming. Initially, these arguments may have seemed plausible; however, as more data has emerged, the basis for such claims has become increasingly untenable. Scientific evidence now clearly demonstrates the link between carbon emissions and rising temperatures, making it difficult for skeptics to maintain their positions without encountering substantial criticism.The untenability of certain beliefs can also be observed in social contexts. For instance, the notion that systemic racism does not exist has been widely challenged in recent years. As movements advocating for racial equality gain momentum, the arguments denying the existence of systemic inequalities have become more untenable. The testimonies of marginalized communities, coupled with statistical evidence highlighting disparities in wealth, education, and criminal justice, have made it increasingly difficult for detractors to uphold their views.In the realm of philosophy, the untenability of certain ethical theories can lead to significant shifts in moral understanding. For example, utilitarianism, which promotes actions that maximize happiness for the greatest number, faces challenges when considering scenarios where the rights of individuals may be compromised for the sake of the majority. As philosophers dissect these dilemmas, the untenability of strict utilitarian principles becomes apparent, prompting the exploration of alternative ethical frameworks that better account for individual rights and dignity.The recognition of untenability in various arguments is crucial for intellectual growth. It encourages individuals to question their beliefs and seek out evidence that either supports or refutes their positions. In academic settings, the ability to identify untenability fosters critical thinking skills, allowing students to engage with complex ideas and develop well-founded arguments.Moreover, acknowledging the untenability of certain viewpoints can lead to constructive dialogue. When individuals recognize that their beliefs may not hold up under scrutiny, they become more open to considering alternative perspectives. This willingness to engage in discourse is essential for societal progress, as it allows for the exchange of ideas and the potential for collective problem-solving.In conclusion, the concept of untenability serves as a reminder of the importance of grounding our beliefs in evidence and reason. Whether in discussions about climate change, social justice, or ethical theories, recognizing the untenability of certain arguments can lead to deeper understanding and more meaningful conversations. As we navigate the complexities of our world, let us strive to embrace the idea that our beliefs should be adaptable and subject to revision in light of new information and insights.

在当今快节奏的世界中，我们常常遇到各种信仰和意识形态，这些信仰和意识形态塑造了我们对现实的理解。然而，有时这些信仰变得越来越难以辩护，导致一种不可维护性。术语不可维护性指的是无法维持或抵御批评或反对的特质。这个概念在有关社会问题、科学理论和哲学论证的讨论中尤其相关。考虑气候变化的辩论。多年来，一些人一直争辩说，人类活动并未显著导致全球变暖。起初，这些论点似乎合理；然而，随着更多数据的出现，这些主张的基础变得越来越不可维护。科学证据现在清楚地表明，碳排放与气温上升之间存在联系，使得怀疑者很难在不遭受重大批评的情况下维持他们的立场。某些信仰的不可维护性也可以在社会背景中观察到。例如，否认系统性种族主义存在的观点近年来受到广泛挑战。随着倡导种族平等的运动势头增强，否认系统性不平等存在的论据变得更加不可维护。边缘化社区的证词，加上突显财富、教育和刑事司法差异的统计证据，使得反对者越来越难以坚持他们的观点。在哲学领域，某些伦理理论的不可维护性可能导致道德理解的重大转变。例如，功利主义提倡最大化大多数人幸福的行为，但在考虑可能牺牲个人权利以谋求多数利益的情境时，面临挑战。随着哲学家们剖析这些困境，严格的功利主义原则的不可维护性变得显而易见，促使探索更好地考虑个人权利和尊严的替代伦理框架。认识到各种论点的不可维护性对智力成长至关重要。它鼓励个人质疑自己的信仰，并寻求支持或反驳其立场的证据。在学术环境中，识别不可维护性的能力培养了批判性思维技能，使学生能够参与复杂思想的探讨并发展有根据的论点。此外，承认某些观点的不可维护性可以促进建设性的对话。当个人认识到他们的信仰在审查下可能无法维持时，他们会更加开放地考虑替代观点。这种参与讨论的意愿对社会进步至关重要，因为它允许思想的交流和集体解决问题的潜力。总之，不可维护性的概念提醒我们，扎根于证据和理性的信仰是多么重要。无论是在气候变化、社会正义还是伦理理论的讨论中，认识到某些论点的不可维护性可以导致更深刻的理解和更有意义的对话。当我们在复杂的世界中航行时，让我们努力接受这样的理念：我们的信仰应该是适应性的，并且在新信息和见解的光照下应当接受修正。