illiberality

简明释义

英[ɪˌlɪbəˈrælɪti]美[ɪˌlɪbəˈræləti]

n. 吝啬；狭隘；不自由；严格

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Sometimes I even call top is an illiberality.

有时我甚至称得上是吝啬。

2.Sometimes I even call top is an illiberality.

有时我甚至称得上是吝啬。

3.The school's policy was criticized for its illiberality, which restricted students' freedom of expression.

学校的政策因其不宽容而受到批评，这限制了学生的表达自由。

4.His illiberality towards differing opinions made it difficult for constructive dialogue to occur.

他对不同意见的狭隘态度使得建设性对话变得困难。

5.Many felt that her illiberality in social policies hindered progress.

许多人认为她在社会政策上的狭隘阻碍了进步。

6.The government faced backlash for its illiberality in censoring the media.

政府因其在审查媒体方面的不宽容而面临反对声浪。

7.The illiberality of the law restricted individual freedoms in the name of security.

法律的不宽容以安全为名限制了个人自由。

作文

In today's world, the concept of freedom is often celebrated as a fundamental human right. However, there exists a contrasting notion that undermines this ideal: illiberality. This term refers to a lack of generosity or openness towards different ideas, beliefs, and lifestyles. It manifests in various forms, such as intolerance, narrow-mindedness, and an unwillingness to accept diversity. Understanding illiberality is crucial for fostering a more inclusive society. To begin with, illiberality can be observed in social interactions where individuals refuse to engage with those who hold differing opinions. For example, in political discussions, people often gravitate towards echo chambers, surrounding themselves with like-minded individuals. This behavior not only stifles healthy debate but also breeds hostility towards opposing views. Such environments are fertile grounds for illiberality, as they promote a culture of exclusion rather than acceptance. Moreover, illiberality is prevalent in educational systems that prioritize conformity over critical thinking. When students are discouraged from questioning established norms or exploring diverse perspectives, they become products of a rigid educational framework. This lack of intellectual freedom hampers creativity and innovation, which are essential for personal and societal growth. It is imperative that educators recognize the dangers of illiberality and strive to create an atmosphere that encourages open dialogue and exploration of different ideas. The impact of illiberality extends beyond individual interactions and educational settings; it permeates into broader societal structures. For instance, laws and policies that discriminate against certain groups often stem from an illiberal mindset. When societies embrace illiberality, they risk perpetuating inequality and social injustice. History has shown us that oppressive regimes thrive on the suppression of dissenting voices and the promotion of a singular narrative. To combat this, it is essential for citizens to advocate for policies that uphold inclusivity and protect the rights of all individuals, regardless of their backgrounds. Furthermore, the rise of social media has exacerbated illiberality by creating platforms where misinformation can spread rapidly. People are more likely to engage with content that aligns with their existing beliefs, leading to a polarization of opinions. This phenomenon not only fuels division but also fosters a culture of hostility towards those who think differently. To mitigate the effects of illiberality in the digital age, users must cultivate critical thinking skills and actively seek out diverse perspectives. In conclusion, illiberality poses significant challenges to the ideals of freedom and inclusivity. It manifests in social interactions, educational institutions, societal structures, and digital platforms. By recognizing the dangers of illiberality and actively working towards a more open-minded approach, we can foster a society that values diversity and promotes understanding. Embracing differences is not only a moral obligation but also a pathway to a richer, more vibrant community. As we move forward, let us challenge illiberality in all its forms and strive for a world where freedom and acceptance reign supreme.

在当今世界，自由的概念常常被视为基本人权而受到庆祝。然而，存在一种与此理想相悖的概念：illiberality。这个术语指的是对不同思想、信仰和生活方式缺乏宽容或开放。它以各种形式表现出来，例如不宽容、狭隘，以及不愿接受多样性。理解illiberality对于促进一个更具包容性的社会至关重要。首先，illiberality可以在社交互动中观察到，个人拒绝与持有不同观点的人进行交流。例如，在政治讨论中，人们通常倾向于回音室，围绕自己志同道合的人。这种行为不仅扼杀了健康的辩论，还滋生了对对立观点的敌意。这种环境是illiberality的温床，因为它促进了排斥而非接受的文化。此外，illiberality在教育系统中也很普遍，这些系统优先考虑服从而非批判性思维。当学生被阻止质疑既定规范或探索多样化视角时，他们就成为了一个僵化教育框架的产物。这种智力自由的缺乏阻碍了创造力和创新，而这些对于个人和社会的成长至关重要。教育工作者必须认识到illiberality的危险，并努力创造一个鼓励开放对话和探索不同思想的氛围。illiberality的影响超越了个体互动和教育环境，渗透到更广泛的社会结构中。例如，歧视某些群体的法律和政策往往源于一种不自由的心态。当社会接受illiberality时，它们就冒着延续不平等和社会不公的风险。历史告诉我们，压迫政权依靠压制异议声音和推动单一叙事而繁荣。为了应对这一问题，公民必须倡导维护包容性和保护所有个人权利的政策，无论他们的背景如何。此外，社交媒体的兴起加剧了illiberality，因为它创造了一个信息可以迅速传播的平台。人们更有可能与符合自己现有信念的内容互动，从而导致观点的极化。这种现象不仅助长了分裂，还培养了对不同思想者的敌意。为了减轻数字时代illiberality的影响，用户必须培养批判性思维能力，积极寻求多样化的视角。总之，illiberality对自由和包容的理想构成了重大挑战。它在社交互动、教育机构、社会结构和数字平台中表现出来。通过认识到illiberality的危险并积极朝着更开放的方式努力，我们可以促进一个重视多样性和促进理解的社会。接受差异不仅是一种道德义务，也是通往更丰富、更生动社区的途径。随着我们向前迈进，让我们在所有形式上挑战illiberality，努力实现一个自由和接受占主导地位的世界。