regicidal

简明释义

英[ˌredʒɪˈsaɪdl]美[ˌredʒəˈsaɪdəl]

adj. 弑君的；大逆不道的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.LIKE being the leader of a regicidal tribe or a fractious Caucasian fief, to be chosen as commissioner of London’s Metropolitan Police has become an ominous accolade.

被选为伦敦警察局的长官，就像杀君弑父成为部落的酋长或者在一块动乱频发的高加索封地做领主一样，荣耀中暗藏凶兆。

2.LIKE being the leader of a regicidal tribe or a fractious Caucasian fief, to be chosen as commissioner of London’s Metropolitan Police has become an ominous accolade.

被选为伦敦警察局的长官，就像杀君弑父成为部落的酋长或者在一块动乱频发的高加索封地做领主一样，荣耀中暗藏凶兆。

3.In history, many regicidal acts have led to significant political changes.

在历史上，许多弑君的行为导致了重大的政治变革。

4.The novel depicted a regicidal conspiracy that unfolded in the royal court.

小说描绘了一个在皇室宫廷中展开的弑君的阴谋。

5.The plot was deemed regicidal due to its intention to overthrow the king.

这个阴谋被认为是弑君的，因为它意图推翻国王。

6.His ambition was so great that he did not shy away from regicidal thoughts.

他的野心如此之大，以至于他并不回避弑君的想法。

7.The documentary explored various regicidal events throughout history.

纪录片探讨了历史上各种弑君的事件。

作文

Throughout history, the act of killing a king or monarch has been seen as one of the most heinous crimes. This act is referred to as regicidal, which denotes the deliberate murder of a reigning king. The implications of regicidal actions extend beyond mere violence; they often signify a profound shift in power dynamics and societal structures. The motivations behind such acts can vary widely, ranging from personal vendettas to political revolutions. In many cultures, the act of killing a king has been viewed not only as an attack on an individual but also as an assault on the very fabric of society itself.One of the most notable examples of regicidal acts can be found in the French Revolution, where King Louis XVI was executed by guillotine in 1793. This event marked a turning point in French history, symbolizing the rejection of absolute monarchy and the rise of republican ideals. The execution was not merely a personal vendetta against Louis XVI; it represented the collective anger of a populace that had suffered under oppressive rule. Thus, the regicidal act was both a culmination of social unrest and a catalyst for change.In literature, regicidal themes often explore the moral and ethical dilemmas surrounding the assassination of a ruler. Shakespeare’s play "Macbeth" delves into the consequences of regicide, illustrating how the murder of King Duncan leads to chaos and tyranny. Macbeth’s ambition drives him to commit this regicidal act, but instead of bringing him power and peace, it plunges the kingdom into darkness. This portrayal serves as a cautionary tale about the destructive nature of unchecked ambition and the moral repercussions of such violent acts.Moreover, the regicidal act can also be seen in modern contexts, where political leaders are assassinated in attempts to overthrow regimes. These acts often lead to civil unrest and instability, demonstrating that the consequences of regicidal actions are far-reaching. For instance, the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in 1914 set off a chain reaction that led to World War I. This example underscores how the killing of a single leader can have global repercussions, altering the course of history.The concept of regicidal actions raises important questions about legitimacy and authority. When is it justified to kill a ruler? Are there circumstances under which such an act can be seen as heroic rather than villainous? These questions have been debated by philosophers and political theorists for centuries. Some argue that regicidal acts can be justified in the face of tyranny, while others contend that they undermine the rule of law and create a cycle of violence.In conclusion, the term regicidal encapsulates a complex interplay of power, morality, and societal change. Whether viewed through the lens of history, literature, or modern politics, the act of killing a king carries significant weight and consequences. Understanding the nuances of regicidal actions allows us to reflect on the nature of authority and the lengths to which individuals will go to challenge it. As we continue to grapple with issues of power and justice in contemporary society, the lessons learned from past regicidal acts remain relevant and thought-provoking.

在历史上，杀死国王或君主的行为被视为最可怕的罪行之一。这种行为被称为regicidal，意指故意谋杀在位的国王。regicidal行为的影响超越了简单的暴力，它们通常意味着权力动态和社会结构的深刻转变。这类行为背后的动机可以广泛变化，从个人仇恨到政治革命。在许多文化中，杀死国王不仅被视为对个体的攻击，也是对社会结构本身的侵犯。一个最显著的regicidal例子可以在法国大革命中找到，当时路易十六于1793年被断头台处决。这一事件标志着法国历史的转折点，象征着对绝对君主制的拒绝和共和主义理想的崛起。处决不仅仅是对路易十六的个人仇恨；它代表了一个在压迫统治下苦苦挣扎的民众的集体愤怒。因此，这一regicidal行为既是社会动荡的高潮，也是变革的催化剂。在文学中，regicidal主题常常探讨围绕暗杀统治者的道德和伦理困境。莎士比亚的剧作《麦克白》深入探讨了国王邓肯的谋杀所带来的后果，揭示了这一regicidal行为如何导致混乱和暴政。麦克白的野心驱使他实施这一行为，但并没有给他带来权力与安宁，反而将王国推入黑暗。这种描绘作为一个警世故事，提醒人们注意无节制的野心及其暴力行为的道德后果。此外，regicidal行为在现代背景中也可以看到，政治领导人被暗杀以试图推翻政权。这些行为往往导致内乱和不稳定，表明regicidal行为的后果是深远的。例如，弗朗茨·斐迪南大公在1914年的刺杀引发了一系列反应，最终导致第一次世界大战。这一例子强调了一个领导者的被杀可以产生全球性的后果，改变历史的进程。regicidal概念提出了关于合法性和权威的重要问题。杀死统治者在何种情况下是合理的？是否存在某些情况下这样的行为可以被视为英雄而非恶棍？这些问题几个世纪以来一直被哲学家和政治理论家辩论。一些人认为，在面对暴政时，regicidal行为是可以被辩解的，而另一些人则认为它们破坏了法治，并创造了暴力的循环。总之，regicidal一词概括了权力、道德和社会变革之间复杂的相互作用。无论是通过历史、文学还是现代政治的视角来看，杀死国王的行为都承载着重要的分量和后果。理解regicidal行为的细微差别使我们能够反思权威的本质以及个人为了挑战权威所愿意付出的代价。随着我们继续在当代社会中处理权力和正义的问题，过去regicidal行为所传达的教训仍然具有相关性和启发性。