patronage
简明释义
英[ˈpætrənɪdʒ]美[ˈpætrənɪdʒˌˈpeɪtrənɪdʒ]
n. 赞助,资助;(对餐馆、酒店或其他生意的)惠顾,光顾;职位授予权,恩惠给予权;庇护,扶植;恩赐态度;(古罗马)庇护人的权力和职责,庇护人的地位
英英释义
单词用法
赞助制度 | |
文化赞助 | |
艺术赞助 | |
艺术的赞助 | |
政治赞助 | |
商业赞助 |
同义词
反义词
忽视 | The artist felt a sense of neglect from the community after his work was not recognized. | 艺术家感到社区对他作品的忽视,因为他的作品没有得到认可。 | |
抛弃 | The abandonment of the project left many workers without jobs. | 项目的抛弃使许多工人失去了工作。 |
例句
1.Exam boards navigate between losing the trust of universities and losing the patronage of schools.
考试委员会因此失去了大学的信任和中学的资助。
2.Promising as it is for minority businesses, this increased patronage poses dangers for them, too.
虽然这对少数民族企业是有希望的,但增加的赞助也给他们带来了危险。
3.This type of dividend is sometimes known as a patronage dividend or patronage refund.
这种类型的股息有时被称为赞助股息或赞助退款。
4.The restaurant has a large patronage.
光顾这家餐馆的人很多。
5.Indeed, Johnson was in 1762 awarded a pension by the Crown—a subtle form of sponsorship, tantamount to state patronage.
事实上,1762年,国王授予了约翰逊养老金——一种微妙的赞助形式,相当于国家资助。
6.Thank you for your patronage, and I wish you the best of luck in your efforts to prevent and diagnose bugs in your programs.
非常感谢您阅读这类文章,祝您在防止和诊断程序错误中好运。
7.The festival relies heavily on government patronage to fund its events.
这个节日严重依赖政府的赞助来资助其活动。
8.She expressed her gratitude for his patronage in supporting her small business.
她对他对她的小生意的赞助表示感谢。
9.Without the patronage of the royal family, many artists would struggle to survive.
没有皇室的赞助,许多艺术家将难以生存。
10.The theater was able to produce more shows due to the patronage from the community.
由于社区的赞助,剧院能够制作更多的演出。
11.The local art gallery thrives on the patronage of wealthy collectors.
当地艺术画廊依靠富有收藏家的赞助蓬勃发展。
作文
The concept of patronage has played a significant role in the development of arts, culture, and various industries throughout history. Essentially, patronage refers to the support, encouragement, or financial backing provided by an individual or organization to artists, writers, musicians, or other creators. This relationship has often been mutually beneficial, as patrons gain prestige and cultural capital while artists receive the resources they need to produce their work.Historically, many renowned artists thrived under the auspices of wealthy patrons. For example, during the Renaissance, figures like Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo received substantial patronage from powerful families such as the Medici. This financial support allowed them to focus on their craft without the burden of economic constraints. In return, patrons were able to showcase their taste and sophistication by commissioning masterpieces that would enhance their status in society.In contemporary society, patronage continues to exist, albeit in different forms. Crowdfunding platforms have emerged as modern-day equivalents of traditional patronage, enabling artists to seek financial support from a wider audience. This democratization of patronage allows individuals to contribute directly to projects they believe in, fostering a sense of community and shared purpose. However, this shift also raises questions about the sustainability of artistic endeavors, as artists may become reliant on the whims of the crowd rather than established patrons.Moreover, patronage is not limited to the arts; it extends into various sectors, including business and politics. In the corporate world, companies often engage in philanthropic activities as a form of patronage, funding initiatives that align with their values while enhancing their public image. Similarly, in politics, politicians may rely on the patronage of influential donors to fund their campaigns, raising concerns about the potential for corruption and undue influence.The implications of patronage are complex and multifaceted. On one hand, it can be a powerful tool for fostering creativity and innovation, providing artists and creators with the means to explore new ideas and push boundaries. On the other hand, it can also create dependencies that limit artistic freedom, as creators may feel pressured to cater to the tastes and preferences of their patrons.Ultimately, understanding patronage requires a nuanced perspective that acknowledges both its benefits and drawbacks. As we navigate an increasingly interconnected world, the dynamics of patronage will likely continue to evolve, influencing the ways in which art and culture are produced and consumed. By critically examining these relationships, we can better appreciate the intricate balance between support and independence that defines the creative landscape.In conclusion, patronage remains a vital aspect of artistic and cultural expression. Whether through traditional means or modern innovations, the support provided by patrons has the power to shape the trajectory of creative endeavors. However, it is essential to remain aware of the potential pitfalls associated with patronage, ensuring that artists retain their voice and autonomy in the face of external influences. As we continue to explore the complexities of patronage, we must strive to foster environments that encourage creativity while respecting the integrity of the artists who bring their visions to life.
“赞助”这一概念在历史上对艺术、文化和各个行业的发展起到了重要作用。基本上,“赞助”指的是个人或组织对艺术家、作家、音乐家或其他创作者提供的支持、鼓励或财务支持。这种关系往往是互惠的,因为赞助者获得声望和文化资本,而艺术家则获得了他们创作所需的资源。在历史上,许多著名的艺术家在富有赞助者的庇护下蓬勃发展。例如,在文艺复兴时期,像达·芬奇和米开朗基罗这样的艺术家得到了美第奇等强大家族的大力“赞助”。这种财政支持使他们能够专注于自己的创作,而不必承担经济负担。作为回报,赞助者能够通过委托杰作来展示他们的品味和社会地位。在当代社会,“赞助”继续存在,尽管形式有所不同。众筹平台已成为传统赞助的现代等价物,使艺术家能够从更广泛的受众中寻求财务支持。这种“赞助”的民主化使个人能够直接为他们相信的项目做出贡献,培养了社区和共同目标的意识。然而,这一转变也引发了关于艺术事业可持续性的问题,因为艺术家可能会依赖于群众的心情,而不是建立的赞助者。此外,“赞助”并不仅限于艺术;它还扩展到各个领域,包括商业和政治。在企业界,公司通常参与慈善活动作为一种“赞助”的形式,资助与其价值观相符的倡议,同时提升其公共形象。同样,在政治上,政治家可能依赖于有影响力的捐赠者的“赞助”来资助他们的竞选活动,这引发了对腐败和不当影响潜在风险的担忧。“赞助”的影响是复杂而多面的。一方面,它可以成为促进创造力和创新的强大工具,为艺术家和创作者提供探索新思想和突破界限的手段。另一方面,它也可能造成依赖性,限制艺术自由,因为创作者可能感到被迫迎合赞助者的口味和偏好。最终,理解“赞助”需要一种细致入微的视角,承认其益处和缺点。随着我们在日益互联的世界中导航,“赞助”的动态可能会继续演变,影响艺术和文化的生产和消费方式。通过批判性地审视这些关系,我们可以更好地欣赏支持与独立之间的微妙平衡,这一平衡定义了创造性景观。总之,“赞助”仍然是艺术和文化表达的重要方面。无论是通过传统手段还是现代创新,赞助者提供的支持都有能力塑造创作事业的轨迹。然而,必须时刻关注与“赞助”相关的潜在陷阱,确保艺术家在面对外部影响时保留他们的声音和自主权。在我们继续探索“赞助”的复杂性时,必须努力营造鼓励创造力的环境,同时尊重那些将他们的愿景呈现出来的艺术家的完整性。