polyarchy

简明释义

英[ˈpɒlɪˌɑːkɪ]美[ˈpɑlɪˌɑrki]

n. 多头政治

复 数 p o l y a r c h i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The concept of polyarchy highlights the importance of pluralism in governance.

多元统治的概念强调了治理中多元主义的重要性。

2.Many democratic nations strive to maintain a polyarchy to ensure diverse representation.

许多民主国家努力维持多元统治以确保多样化的代表性。

3.Critics argue that modern democracies often fall short of being a true polyarchy.

批评者认为现代民主往往未能真正实现多元统治。

4.In a true polyarchy, various interest groups compete for power and influence.

在一个真正的多元统治中，各种利益团体争夺权力和影响力。

5.The transition from authoritarian rule to polyarchy can be a challenging process.

从威权统治向多元统治的过渡可能是一个具有挑战性的过程。

作文

In contemporary political discourse, the term polyarchy refers to a form of government in which power is distributed among multiple leaders or groups rather than being concentrated in a single authority. This concept was popularized by political scientist Robert Dahl, who contrasted it with traditional forms of governance such as autocracy or oligarchy. The essence of polyarchy lies in its emphasis on pluralism and democratic practices, allowing for a more inclusive representation of diverse interests within society.One of the key features of polyarchy is the existence of multiple centers of power that can engage in competition for influence and authority. This competition is crucial for the health of a democracy, as it encourages accountability and responsiveness among leaders. In a polyarchy, citizens have the opportunity to participate in the political process through voting, advocacy, and civic engagement. This level of participation is essential for ensuring that governments remain attuned to the needs and desires of their constituents.Furthermore, polyarchy promotes the idea of civil liberties, including freedom of speech, assembly, and the press. These rights are vital for fostering an environment where diverse viewpoints can be expressed and debated. In contrast to more authoritarian regimes, where dissent is often suppressed, a polyarchy allows for open dialogue and discussion, leading to more informed decision-making and policy development.However, achieving a true polyarchy is not without its challenges. Socioeconomic inequalities, systemic discrimination, and other barriers can hinder the full participation of all citizens in the political process. For instance, marginalized communities may struggle to have their voices heard, leading to a skewed representation in governance. Therefore, it is imperative for societies aspiring to be polyarchies to actively work towards inclusivity and equality, ensuring that all groups have a stake in the political landscape.Moreover, the rise of populism and authoritarianism in various parts of the world poses a significant threat to the principles of polyarchy. Leaders who prioritize their own power over the democratic process can undermine the very foundations of pluralism and accountability. It is crucial for citizens to remain vigilant and engaged in order to protect their rights and uphold the values of a polyarchy. This involves not only participating in elections but also advocating for reforms that enhance democratic institutions and practices.In conclusion, polyarchy represents a dynamic and multifaceted approach to governance that seeks to balance power among various actors in society. While it offers numerous advantages in terms of representation and accountability, it also demands continuous effort to address existing inequalities and safeguard democratic principles. By fostering a culture of participation and inclusivity, societies can strive towards a more equitable and effective polyarchy, ultimately benefiting all citizens and enhancing the overall health of democracy.

在当代政治话语中，术语多元统治指的是一种政府形式，其中权力分散在多个领导者或团体之间，而不是集中在单一权威手中。这个概念由政治学家罗伯特·达尔（Robert Dahl）普及，他将其与传统的治理形式如独裁或寡头治理进行了对比。多元统治的本质在于强调多元主义和民主实践，允许社会内不同利益的更广泛代表。多元统治的一个关键特征是存在多个权力中心，这些中心可以相互竞争以争夺影响力和权威。这种竞争对于民主的健康至关重要，因为它鼓励领导者的问责制和响应性。在多元统治中，公民有机会通过投票、倡导和公民参与参与政治过程。这种参与水平对于确保政府始终关注其选民的需求和愿望至关重要。此外，多元统治促进了公民自由的理念，包括言论、集会和新闻自由。这些权利对于营造一个能够表达和辩论多样观点的环境至关重要。与那些通常压制异议的更专制的政权相比，多元统治允许开放的对话和讨论，从而导致更明智的决策和政策发展。然而，实现真正的多元统治并非没有挑战。社会经济不平等、系统性歧视和其他障碍可能阻碍所有公民在政治过程中的充分参与。例如，边缘化社区可能难以让自己的声音被听到，导致治理中的代表性失衡。因此，渴望成为多元统治的社会必须积极努力实现包容性和平等，确保所有群体在政治格局中拥有发言权。此外，世界各地民粹主义和专制主义的兴起对多元统治的原则构成了重大威胁。优先考虑自身权力而非民主过程的领导者可能会破坏多元主义和问责制的基础。因此，公民必须保持警惕和参与，以保护他们的权利并维护多元统治的价值观。这不仅涉及参与选举，还包括倡导增强民主制度和实践的改革。总之，多元统治代表了一种动态和多面的治理方法，旨在平衡社会中各种行为者之间的权力。虽然它在代表性和问责制方面提供了许多优势，但它也需要不断努力解决现存的不平等问题，维护民主原则。通过培养参与和包容的文化，社会可以努力朝着更公平和有效的多元统治迈进，最终使所有公民受益，增强民主的整体健康。