presentism

简明释义

英[/ˈprɛzənˌtɪzəm/]美[/ˈprɛzənˌtɪzəm/]

n. 现代主义

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Good historians call it "presentism ".

优秀的历史学家称之为“现代主义”。

2.Good historians call it "presentism ".

优秀的历史学家称之为“现代主义”。

3.Critics of presentism argue that it ignores the context in which historical events occurred.

批评现在主义的人认为它忽视了历史事件发生的背景。

4.In literature, presentism can lead to misinterpretations of a text's meaning based on modern societal norms.

在文学中，现在主义可能导致根据现代社会规范对文本含义的误解。

5.In film criticism, presentism can result in unfair evaluations of older movies that reflected the values of their time.

在电影评论中，现在主义可能导致对反映其时代价值观的旧电影的不公平评估。

6.The debate about historical figures often includes accusations of presentism, as people argue whether their actions should be judged by today's standards.

关于历史人物的辩论常常包括对现在主义的指责，因为人们争论他们的行为是否应该按照今天的标准来评判。

7.Many historians criticize the tendency towards presentism, which is the interpretation of past events through the lens of contemporary values.

许多历史学家批评这种倾向，即通过当代价值观来解读过去事件的现在主义。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, many individuals tend to focus solely on the present moment, often neglecting the lessons of the past or the potential of the future. This phenomenon is known as presentism, which refers to the tendency to interpret historical events and figures through a contemporary lens, often leading to anachronistic judgments. While it is natural for people to relate their experiences to current contexts, presentism can distort our understanding of history and its complexities.To illustrate, consider the way we view historical leaders. Figures like Thomas Jefferson or Mahatma Gandhi are often scrutinized for their actions and beliefs by today's standards. However, this approach fails to account for the societal norms and values of their time. By applying presentism, we risk oversimplifying their contributions and overlooking the significant challenges they faced within their historical context.Moreover, presentism can lead to the dismissal of valuable insights from the past. For instance, many modern movements for social justice draw inspiration from historical figures and events. However, if we judge these historical references solely based on contemporary values, we might miss the nuances that shaped those movements. Understanding the past requires a careful analysis that respects its context while also recognizing its relevance to present issues.In education, presentism poses a challenge for teachers and students alike. When history is taught with a strong emphasis on current perspectives, students may develop a skewed understanding of events. This can result in a lack of critical thinking skills, as students might not learn to analyze historical sources or question the motivations behind them. Instead, they may simply accept narratives that align with modern viewpoints, which can stifle intellectual growth.Furthermore, presentism is not limited to history; it can also affect our perception of literature and art. Many classic works are often re-evaluated through the lens of contemporary values, leading to debates about their relevance or appropriateness today. While it is important to engage with these works critically, an overly simplistic application of presentism can undermine the artistic intentions and cultural significance of these pieces.In conclusion, while it is essential to acknowledge the present and its influence on our understanding of the world, we must be cautious of the pitfalls of presentism. By striving for a balanced perspective that considers both historical context and contemporary relevance, we can foster a deeper appreciation for history, literature, and the complexities of human experience. Embracing this dual awareness allows us to learn from the past while navigating the present, ultimately enriching our understanding of both realms. Therefore, it is crucial to cultivate a mindset that resists the allure of presentism and seeks a more nuanced engagement with history and culture.

在当今快节奏的世界中，许多人往往只专注于当下，常常忽视过去的教训或未来的潜力。这种现象被称为现在主义，它指的是通过当代视角来解读历史事件和人物的倾向，这常常导致不合时宜的判断。虽然人们将自己的经历与当前背景相联系是很自然的，但现在主义可能会扭曲我们对历史及其复杂性的理解。例如，考虑一下我们如何看待历史领袖。像托马斯·杰斐逊或甘地这样的历史人物常常被按照今天的标准进行审视。然而，这种方法未能考虑他们所处时代的社会规范和价值观。通过应用现在主义，我们冒着简化他们贡献的风险，并忽视了塑造这些人物的重大挑战。在理解过去时，需要谨慎分析，尊重其背景，同时也要认识到其与当前问题的相关性。在教育中，现在主义对教师和学生都构成了挑战。当历史教学过于强调当前观点时，学生可能会对事件产生扭曲的理解。这可能导致批判性思维能力的缺乏，因为学生可能不会学会分析历史资料或质疑其背后的动机。相反，他们可能只是接受与现代观点一致的叙事，这可能会抑制智力的发展。此外，现在主义不仅限于历史；它还可能影响我们对文学和艺术的看法。许多经典作品常常通过当代价值观重新评估，引发关于其当今相关性或适当性的辩论。虽然以批判的眼光参与这些作品是重要的，但过于简单地应用现在主义可能会削弱这些作品的艺术意图和文化意义。总之，虽然承认当下及其对我们理解世界的影响至关重要，但我们必须对现在主义的陷阱保持警惕。通过追求一种平衡的视角，既考虑历史背景又考虑当代相关性，我们可以更深入地欣赏历史、文学以及人类经验的复杂性。拥抱这种双重意识使我们能够从过去中学习，同时驾驭当下，最终丰富我们对这两个领域的理解。因此，培养一种抵制现在主义诱惑的心态，寻求与历史和文化更细致的互动是至关重要的。