instrumentalism

简明释义

英[ˌɪnstrəˈmentəlɪz(ə)m]美[ˌɪnstrəˈmentlˌɪzəm]

n. [劳经] 工具主义

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The predicament of modern education lies in its utilitarianism and instrumentalism.

现代教育之困境，乃在于教育的功利性和工具性。

2.So the lesson that Newton grew in the case of gravity and Berkeley generalized as we saw in his instrumentalism.

这么一来牛顿提出的万有引力过程，我们把它视作工具主义，柏克莱将其普遍化。

3.But the idea of the subjectivity education didn't mean the extinction of instrumentalism; they can coexist in some period to be the multi-guideline of doctoral training model in China.

主体性教育思想的产生并不代表工具性教育思想的消亡，在一定时期内两种思想共存，构成我国多元化的博士生培养模式指导思想。

4.First, based on the value of law procedure, the knowledge of the value of law procedure is divided into procedure instrumentalism and procedure parochialism.

首先从法律程序的价值论出发，将对法律程序价值的认识分为程序工具主义和程序本位主义。

5.But the idea of the subjectivity education didn't mean the extinction of instrumentalism; they can coexist in some period to be the multi-guideline of doctoral training model in China.

主体性教育思想的产生并不代表工具性教育思想的消亡，在一定时期内两种思想共存，构成我国多元化的博士生培养模式指导思想。

6.Giere's instrumentalism epistemology was essentially the same as Quine's views, and both of them resorts to the science to solve the epistemology problems.

吉尔的工具认识论本质上与奎因的观点一样都诉诸科学以解决认识论问题。

7.This special feature of language presents the embedded nature of non-instrumentalism of language.

这是语言特质的非工具性质的体现。

8.The extensive application of procedure justice theory will be in favor of desalting 'procedure instrumentalism' and eliminating 'regard entity belittle procedure' idea.

程序正义理论的广泛应用，将有利于“程序工具主义”的淡化和消除我国“重实体轻程序”的观念。

9.That's instrumentalism.

那便是工具主义。

10.The concept of instrumentalism is often discussed in the context of scientific realism and anti-realism.

在科学实在论和反实在论的背景下，instrumentalism 的概念常常被讨论。

11.The teacher emphasized instrumentalism in her lesson plan, focusing on how students could use math as a tool for solving real-world problems.

老师在课程计划中强调了instrumentalism，专注于学生如何将数学作为解决现实问题的工具。

12.In philosophy, instrumentalism refers to the idea that theories are merely tools for predicting phenomena rather than true descriptions of reality.

在哲学中，instrumentalism 指的是理论仅仅是预测现象的工具，而不是对现实的真实描述。

13.Critics of instrumentalism argue that it overlooks the importance of understanding the underlying truths of scientific theories.

批评instrumentalism的人认为它忽视了理解科学理论背后基本真理的重要性。

14.In economics, instrumentalism can be applied to analyze how economic models serve practical purposes rather than reflecting true economic behavior.

在经济学中，instrumentalism 可以用来分析经济模型如何服务于实际目的，而不是反映真实的经济行为。

作文

The philosophy of science often grapples with various interpretations and frameworks that guide our understanding of the world. One such framework is known as instrumentalism, which posits that theories and models in science are merely instruments for predicting observable phenomena rather than true representations of reality. This perspective challenges the idea that scientific theories must accurately describe the underlying nature of the universe. Instead, instrumentalism emphasizes the practical utility of these theories in making sense of our experiences and guiding our actions. For instance, consider the theory of gravity. While classical mechanics provides a robust mathematical framework for predicting the motion of objects under the influence of gravitational forces, an instrumentalist might argue that this theory does not necessarily reveal the true nature of gravity itself. Instead, it serves as a valuable tool for understanding and predicting the behavior of physical objects in our everyday lives. By focusing on the effectiveness of theories in application rather than their ontological status, instrumentalism encourages a pragmatic approach to scientific inquiry.Moreover, instrumentalism can be seen as a reaction against more realist interpretations of science, which assert that scientific theories aim to provide accurate depictions of unobservable entities and processes. Realists argue that successful scientific theories must correspond to the actual structure of the world. However, instrumentalism counters this by suggesting that the success of a theory does not necessitate its truth. A theory can be useful and predictive without being an accurate representation of the underlying reality. This distinction is crucial because it allows scientists to focus on the applicability of their theories without getting bogged down in metaphysical debates about what exists beyond observation.In practical terms, instrumentalism has significant implications for how we conduct scientific research and evaluate theories. It encourages scientists to prioritize models and frameworks that yield reliable predictions over those that claim to uncover the 'truth' about the universe. This approach can lead to a more flexible and adaptive scientific practice, where theories are continually tested and refined based on their performance in real-world applications.However, instrumentalism is not without its critics. Some argue that it can lead to a form of skepticism regarding the existence of unobservable phenomena, potentially undermining the pursuit of deeper understanding in fields like physics and cosmology. Critics contend that dismissing the quest for truth in favor of mere utility may limit the scope of scientific exploration and hinder our ability to engage with fundamental questions about the nature of existence.In conclusion, instrumentalism offers a compelling lens through which to view scientific theories and their role in our understanding of the world. By prioritizing the practical application of theories over their metaphysical implications, instrumentalism fosters a pragmatic approach to science that values prediction and utility. While it faces challenges and criticisms, this perspective remains an important aspect of philosophical discourse in the philosophy of science, prompting ongoing discussions about the nature of scientific knowledge and its relationship to reality.

科学哲学经常探讨各种解释和框架，这些框架指导我们理解世界。其中一个框架被称为工具主义，它认为科学中的理论和模型仅仅是预测可观察现象的工具，而不是对现实的真实描述。这一观点挑战了科学理论必须准确描述宇宙根本性质的观念。相反，工具主义强调这些理论在理解我们经验和指导我们行动方面的实用性。例如，考虑重力理论。虽然经典力学提供了一个强大的数学框架，用于预测物体在重力作用下的运动，但一个工具主义者可能会认为这个理论并不一定揭示重力本身的真实本质。相反，它作为一个有价值的工具，用于理解和预测我们日常生活中物理对象的行为。通过关注理论在应用中的有效性，而不是它们的本体地位，工具主义鼓励一种务实的科学探究方法。此外，工具主义可以被视为对更现实主义的科学解释的反应，后者主张科学理论旨在提供对不可观察实体和过程的准确描绘。现实主义者认为，成功的科学理论必须与世界的实际结构相对应。然而，工具主义反驳这一点，认为理论的成功并不必然要求其真实。一个理论可以是有用的和可预测的，而不是真正代表潜在现实。这一区别至关重要，因为它使科学家能够专注于他们理论的适用性，而不必陷入关于观察之外存在什么的形而上学辩论。在实际层面上，工具主义对我们如何进行科学研究和评估理论具有重要影响。它鼓励科学家优先考虑那些产生可靠预测的模型和框架，而不是那些声称揭示宇宙“真相”的理论。这种方法可以导致一种更灵活和适应性的科学实践，在这种实践中，理论不断根据其在现实应用中的表现进行测试和完善。然而，工具主义并非没有批评者。一些人认为，这可能导致对不可观察现象存在的怀疑，从而潜在地削弱了在物理学和宇宙学等领域追求更深理解的努力。批评者认为，放弃对真理的追求以换取单纯的实用性，可能限制科学探索的范围，并阻碍我们与关于存在本质的根本问题的互动。总之，工具主义提供了一个引人入胜的视角，通过这个视角我们可以看待科学理论及其在我们理解世界中的作用。通过优先考虑理论的实际应用而不是其形而上学含义，工具主义促进了一种务实的科学方法，重视预测和实用性。尽管面临挑战和批评，这一观点仍然是科学哲学讨论的重要方面，促使人们对科学知识的性质及其与现实的关系进行持续讨论。