orthodoxy

简明释义

英[ˈɔːθədɒksi]美[ˈɔːrθədɑːksi]

n. 正统；正教；正统说法

复 数 o r t h o d o x i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.There wasn't anything called orthodoxy yet and heresy yet.

那时还没有所谓的正统和异端。

2.Nearly all Mr Romney's policies fit with Republican orthodoxy, but many voters doubt his sincerity.

罗姆尼先生几乎所有政策都符合共和党正统，但许多选民质疑他的真诚。

3.Orthodoxy, of whatever color, seems to demand a lifeless, imitative style.

正统，不论是什么颜色的，好象就要求没有生命的模仿的风格。

4.There is a lot of truth to this, of course. But perhaps not quite as much as orthodoxy would have it.

当然，这个说法有很大的可信度，但是或许不想传统观点坚信得那么可信。

5.I would like that community to respect me enough to keep giving me new ideas rather than insist I subscribe to an orthodoxy.

我愿意被社区所尊敬，以至于可以一直给我新的想法，而不是坚持让我订阅正统的说法。

6.But Old Princeton didn't repristinate every out-dated notion of 17th century Reformed orthodoxy.

但是老普林斯顿并没有谴责所有过时的17世纪改革宗正统观念。

7.Before the marriage, Philip renounced his Greek and Danish titles and converted from Greek Orthodoxy to Anglicanism.

在结婚前，菲利普放弃了他的王子称号，并将信仰从希腊正教转换为了英国国教。

8."The Wire" may be stylised and fictional, but it contains kernels of truth about the frustrations of battling professional orthodoxy.

TheWire “本身也许太过于虚幻与程序化，但它确实包含了一个事实的核心：当面对专业化的正统地位时我们的挫折无助。”

9.But the new orthodoxy is itself based on uncertain Numbers.

但这个新公式本身也是基于不确定数据得出的。

10.In many cultures, religious orthodoxy can dictate social norms and behaviors.

在许多文化中，宗教正统观念可以决定社会规范和行为。

11.The artist's work was a rebellion against the orthodoxy of contemporary art.

这位艺术家的作品是对当代艺术正统观念的反抗。

12.The scientist challenged the prevailing orthodoxy in climate change research.

这位科学家挑战了气候变化研究中的普遍正统观念。

13.His views on economics deviated from the traditional orthodoxy taught in universities.

他对经济学的看法偏离了大学教授的传统正统观念。

14.The political party's orthodoxy was challenged by a new faction advocating for reform.

该政党的正统观念受到一个倡导改革的新派系的挑战。

作文

In today's rapidly changing world, the concept of orthodoxy (正统) is often challenged and redefined. Traditionally, orthodoxy refers to the adherence to established doctrines or beliefs, particularly in religion, politics, and philosophy. However, as society evolves, the rigidity of orthodoxy can sometimes stifle creativity and innovation. This essay explores the implications of orthodoxy in various fields and the importance of balancing tradition with progressive thought.In the realm of religion, orthodoxy plays a significant role in shaping the beliefs and practices of followers. For instance, many religious institutions uphold strict interpretations of sacred texts, which can provide a sense of stability and community for believers. Yet, this strict adherence can also lead to conflicts with modern values, such as inclusivity and acceptance. As a result, some individuals and groups advocate for a more flexible approach to orthodoxy, encouraging reinterpretation of ancient texts to align with contemporary understandings of morality and ethics.Similarly, in the political sphere, orthodoxy can dictate the policies and ideologies that dominate public discourse. Political parties often rely on established principles to unify their members and attract voters. However, when these principles become too rigid, they can alienate those who seek reform or change. The rise of populism in various parts of the world exemplifies this tension, as many citizens reject traditional orthodoxies in favor of alternative narratives that resonate with their experiences and aspirations.Moreover, the field of science is not immune to the influence of orthodoxy. Scientific communities often establish accepted theories and methodologies, which can serve as a foundation for further research. However, history has shown that revolutionary ideas frequently emerge from questioning and challenging the status quo. Figures like Galileo and Darwin faced significant opposition from their contemporaries, who adhered to the orthodoxies of their times. These examples highlight the necessity of fostering an environment where questioning orthodoxy is encouraged, as it leads to progress and deeper understanding.The arts are another domain where orthodoxy can both inspire and inhibit creativity. Artists often draw upon established styles and techniques, which can provide a framework for their work. Yet, true innovation often arises from breaking away from these conventions. Movements such as Impressionism and Abstract Expressionism emerged as artists sought to defy the orthodoxies of their eras, ultimately reshaping the landscape of art itself. This illustrates the delicate balance between respecting tradition and embracing new ideas.In conclusion, while orthodoxy (正统) serves as a guiding principle in various aspects of life, it is crucial to recognize its limitations. Embracing change and encouraging dialogue around established beliefs can lead to a more inclusive and dynamic society. By challenging orthodoxy, we open the door to new possibilities and foster an environment where innovation thrives. It is essential to remember that progress often requires us to question the very foundations upon which we stand, allowing us to create a future that reflects the diverse and evolving nature of human experience.

在当今快速变化的世界中，orthodoxy（正统）这一概念常常受到挑战和重新定义。传统上，orthodoxy指的是对建立的教义或信仰的遵循，尤其是在宗教、政治和哲学领域。然而，随着社会的发展，orthodoxy的僵化有时会抑制创造力和创新。本文探讨了orthodoxy在各个领域的影响及其与进步思想之间平衡的重要性。在宗教领域，orthodoxy在塑造信徒的信仰和实践方面起着重要作用。例如，许多宗教机构坚持对神圣文本的严格解释，这为信徒提供了稳定感和社区感。然而，这种严格遵循也可能导致与现代价值观的冲突，例如包容性和接受性。因此，一些个人和团体提倡对orthodoxy采取更灵活的态度，鼓励对古老文本的重新解释，以使其与当代对道德和伦理的理解相一致。同样，在政治领域，orthodoxy可以决定主导公共话语的政策和意识形态。政党通常依赖于既定原则来团结其成员并吸引选民。然而，当这些原则变得过于僵化时，它们可能会疏远那些寻求改革或变革的人。各国民粹主义的兴起便是这种紧张关系的例证，因为许多公民拒绝传统的orthodoxies，转而支持与他们的经历和愿望相符的替代叙事。此外，科学领域也不例外地受到orthodoxy的影响。科学界通常建立公认的理论和方法，这可以作为进一步研究的基础。然而，历史表明，革命性思想往往源于对现状的质疑和挑战。伽利略和达尔文等人物在面对同时代人的反对时，他们的同时代人坚持当时的orthodoxies。这些例子强调了培养一个鼓励质疑orthodoxy的环境的必要性，因为这会导致进步和更深刻的理解。艺术领域也是一个orthodoxy既能激励又能抑制创造力的领域。艺术家们通常借鉴既定风格和技巧，这为他们的作品提供了框架。然而，真正的创新往往来自于打破这些常规。印象派和抽象表现主义等运动的出现，正是因为艺术家们寻求违背其时代的orthodoxies，最终重塑了艺术的面貌。这说明了尊重传统与拥抱新思想之间微妙的平衡。总之，虽然orthodoxy（正统）在生活的各个方面充当指导原则，但至关重要的是认识到它的局限性。拥抱变化并鼓励围绕既定信仰的对话，可以导致一个更加包容和动态的社会。通过挑战orthodoxy，我们为新的可能性打开了大门，并营造了一个创新蓬勃发展的环境。我们必须记住，进步往往需要我们质疑我们所立足的基础，从而创造出一个反映人类经验多样性和演变性的未来。