privatize

简明释义

英[ˈpraɪvətaɪz]美[ˈpraɪvətaɪz]

v. 使私有化，使私营化

第 三 人 称 单 数 p r i v a t i z e s

现 在 分 词 p r i v a t i z i n g

过 去 式 p r i v a t i z e d

过 去 分 词 p r i v a t i z e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Please note we can only privatize domains that are current registered through us.

请注意，我们只能给已经从我们这里注册号的域名隐私。

2.And that brings me to Mitt Romney's latest really bad idea, unveiled on Veterans Day: to partially privatize the Veterans Health Administration v.

说的这里，我要说米特·罗姆尼最新提出的真正坏主意——部分私有化“退伍军人健康管理局”。

3.The core of the Ryan proposal is a plan to privatize and defund Medicare.

瑞安提案的核心，就是一份“老年医保”私有化和不向“老年医保”提供资金的计划。

4.NARRATOR: the young reformers asked Boris Jordan, one of the first foreign bankers to set up shop in Moscow, to find a company to privatize. But they had to move fast.

旁白：鲍里斯·乔丹(Boris Jordan)是第一个在莫斯科开设营业部的外国银行家，年轻的改革家们要求他寻找一家公司进行私有化，但他们必须行动迅速。

5.But laying down dozens of tents and announcing that you and your friends intend to live there indefinitely always sounded suspiciously like an attempt to, in effect, privatize that public space.

但是放下成千上万的帐篷并声明自己和自己的朋友们将打算住在那里一直不走，总是让人听起来产生怀疑，是不是有一种将公共场所据为己有的企图。

6.But laying down dozens of tents and announcing that you and your friends intend to live there indefinitely always sounded suspiciously like an attempt to, in effect, privatize that public space.

但是放下成千上万的帐篷并声明自己和自己的朋友们将打算住在那里一直不走，总是让人听起来产生怀疑，是不是有一种将公共场所据为己有的企图。

7.Cut taxes and spending, privatize, and deregulate.

缩减税收和消费，私有化，接触管制。

8.Armenia has also managed to slash inflation, stabilize the local currency (the DRAM), and privatize most small - and medium-sized enterprises.

亚美尼亚也已经成功地削减了通货膨胀，稳定了其货币(the dram)，并且完成了大多数小型和中型的企业的私有化。

9.After years of debate, the city council voted to privatize the waste management services.

经过多年的辩论，市议会投票决定私有化垃圾管理服务。

10.The process to privatize the water supply has faced significant public opposition.

对私有化水供应的过程遭遇了公众的强烈反对。

11.The government decided to privatize the national railway system to improve efficiency.

政府决定私有化国家铁路系统以提高效率。

12.Some countries have successfully privatized their telecommunications industries.

一些国家成功地私有化了他们的电信产业。

13.Many believe that privatizing public services can lead to better quality and lower costs.

许多人认为私有化公共服务可以带来更好的质量和更低的成本。

作文

In recent decades, the trend of governments around the world has been to privatize many state-owned enterprises. This shift towards privatization has sparked debates among economists, policymakers, and citizens alike. The process of privatizing public assets often promises increased efficiency and better services, but it also raises concerns about equity and access. To understand the implications of privatization, we must first examine its definition. To privatize means to transfer ownership of a public service or asset to a private entity. This can occur in various sectors, such as healthcare, education, transportation, and utilities. For example, when a government sells a public hospital to a private company, that hospital becomes a profit-driven entity rather than one focused solely on public welfare. Proponents of privatization argue that private companies are generally more efficient than government-run organizations. They claim that competition in the private sector leads to innovation and improved quality of services. For instance, in many countries, the introduction of privatized telecommunications and internet services has resulted in lower prices and better technology for consumers. This is often attributed to the competitive nature of the private market, where companies strive to attract customers by offering superior products and services. However, critics of privatization point out several potential downsides. One significant concern is that privatizing essential services can lead to inequities in access. When profit becomes the primary motive, there is a risk that vulnerable populations may be neglected. For example, if a government privatizes water services, the new private company may prioritize profit over providing affordable access to clean water for all. This could disproportionately affect low-income communities, leading to social unrest and increased inequality. Moreover, privatization can lead to a loss of accountability. Public institutions are typically subject to governmental oversight, which can ensure that they operate in the public interest. In contrast, private companies often prioritize shareholder profits over community needs. This shift can result in reduced transparency and less responsiveness to citizen concerns. A notable example is the privatization of prisons in some countries, where the focus on profit has raised ethical questions about the treatment of inmates and the overall justice system. In conclusion, the decision to privatize public services is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of both the potential benefits and drawbacks. While privatization can lead to increased efficiency and innovation, it also poses risks related to equity, access, and accountability. As societies continue to grapple with these challenges, it is crucial to engage in informed discussions about the role of government and the private sector in providing essential services. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a balanced approach that prioritizes the well-being of all citizens while harnessing the strengths of both public and private entities.

近年来，世界各国政府的趋势是将许多国有企业私有化。这一向私有化的转变引发了经济学家、政策制定者和公民之间的辩论。私有化公共资产的过程通常承诺提高效率和更好的服务，但也引发了对公平和可及性的担忧。要理解私有化的影响，我们必须首先检查其定义。私有化是指将公共服务或资产的所有权转移给私人实体。这可以发生在多个领域，例如医疗保健、教育、交通和公用事业。例如，当一个政府将一家公立医院出售给一家私人公司时，该医院就变成了一个以盈利为驱动的实体，而不是仅专注于公共福利。私有化的支持者认为，私营公司通常比政府运营的组织更有效。他们声称，私营部门的竞争导致创新和服务质量的改善。例如，在许多国家，引入私有化的电信和互联网服务导致消费者价格降低和技术提升。这通常归因于私营市场的竞争性质，公司努力通过提供优质产品和服务来吸引客户。然而，私有化的批评者指出几个潜在的缺点。一个重要的担忧是，私有化基本服务可能会导致可及性的不平等。当利润成为主要动机时，脆弱群体可能会被忽视。例如，如果政府私有化水务服务，新的私人公司可能会优先考虑利润，而不是为所有人提供负担得起的清洁水。这可能会对低收入社区产生不成比例的影响，导致社会动荡和不平等加剧。此外，私有化可能导致问责制的丧失。公共机构通常受到政府监管，这可以确保它们以公众利益为导向。相比之下，私人公司往往优先考虑股东利润而非社区需求。这种转变可能导致透明度降低，对公民关切的响应能力减弱。一个显著的例子是在一些国家的监狱私有化，其对利润的关注引发了关于囚犯待遇和整体司法系统的伦理问题。总之，私有化公共服务的决定是一个复杂的问题，需要仔细考虑潜在的好处和缺点。虽然私有化可以导致效率和创新的提高，但它也带来了与公平、可及性和问责制相关的风险。随着社会继续应对这些挑战，进行关于政府和私营部门在提供基本服务中角色的知情讨论至关重要。最终，目标应该是创造一种平衡的方法，优先考虑所有公民的福祉，同时利用公共和私营实体的优势。