scientism

简明释义

英[ˈsaɪəntɪzəm]美[ˈsaɪəntɪzəm]

n. 科学态度；科学至上主义

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The fierce conflict has been aroused between scientism and humanism in the field of psychology in the pursuit of the discourse of the authorities.

对权力话语的追求，引起了心理学中科学主义和人文主义的激烈冲突。

2.The bionics algorithm provides a new scientism method on designing plank thickness of the hydraulic press frame and other box structures.

仿生算法为大型油压机横梁及其它薄壁箱形结构的优化设计提供了一种全新可行的科学方法。

3.They showed that scientism is a mis-reading of rationality of science, and the rationality must be reoriented.

他们的分析表明，科学主义是对科学理性的“误解”，科学理性必须转向。

4.There are radical difference in relationship between teacher and students between scientism education and humanism education.

科学主义教育和人文主义教育在师生关系上存在根本的分歧。

5.Science and humans are the main topics of the theories of scientism and humanism and meanwhile the "problem in the problems" of modern education.

科学与人是科学主义和人本主义谈论的主要论题，也是现代教育“问题中的问题”。

6.The modernity of literary theory is evident scientism and systematism of diction.

文学理论的现代性表现为理论言语的科学化与体系化。

7.In the second part, the social contexts of the rise of Chinese contemporary anti-scientism are analyzed.

第二部分，分析中国当代的反科学主义产生的背景。

8.Nowdays, authoritarianism, utilitarianism, elitism and scientism are four important educational ideas which have influenced teaching staff for long.

权威主义、功利主义、精英主义和科学主义是长期以来存留在当今教育工作者中的重要教育理念。

9.In a debate about education, one side emphasized scientism 科学主义 as the only valid approach to knowledge.

在一次关于教育的辩论中，一方强调将 科学主义 scientism 视为唯一有效的知识获取方法。

10.The rise of scientism 科学主义 has led some to neglect the importance of philosophy and ethics in scientific discourse.

随着 科学主义 scientism 的兴起，一些人开始忽视哲学和伦理在科学讨论中的重要性。

11.Critics of scientism 科学主义 often highlight the limitations of relying solely on empirical evidence.

对 科学主义 scientism 的批评者常常强调仅依赖实证证据的局限性。

12.Many critics argue that scientism 科学主义 limits our understanding of human experience by dismissing subjective insights.

许多批评者认为，科学主义 scientism 限制了我们对人类经验的理解，因为它否定了主观见解。

13.Proponents of scientism 科学主义 believe that all questions can be answered through scientific inquiry.

支持 科学主义 scientism 的人认为，所有问题都可以通过科学探究来回答。

作文

In the modern world, the influence of science on our daily lives is undeniable. From technology to medicine, scientific advancements have transformed how we live, work, and interact with one another. However, this overwhelming reliance on science has given rise to a philosophical stance known as scientism, which asserts that science is the ultimate authority in all areas of knowledge. While science undoubtedly provides valuable insights into the natural world, scientism can lead to a narrow understanding of human experience and reality.The term scientism refers to the belief that scientific knowledge is superior to other forms of understanding, such as philosophy, art, or spirituality. Proponents of scientism argue that empirical evidence and scientific methods are the only valid means of acquiring knowledge. This perspective can be appealing, especially in an age where technology and scientific breakthroughs dominate headlines. However, it raises important questions about the limitations of science itself.One significant criticism of scientism is that it often dismisses subjective experiences and qualitative data that cannot be measured through scientific methods. For example, human emotions, ethical dilemmas, and aesthetic judgments are essential aspects of our lives that science struggles to quantify. By prioritizing scientific knowledge above all else, scientism risks marginalizing these vital elements of human existence.Moreover, the strict adherence to scientism can create a false dichotomy between science and other disciplines. This polarization can hinder interdisciplinary collaboration, which is crucial for addressing complex global challenges such as climate change, public health crises, and social inequality. Many of these issues require not just scientific expertise but also insights from the humanities, social sciences, and ethical considerations.Additionally, scientism can foster a sense of intellectual elitism, where individuals who do not possess a scientific background may feel undervalued or excluded from meaningful discussions about society and its future. This attitude can undermine the importance of diverse perspectives and experiences, which are essential for holistic understanding and problem-solving.In contrast to scientism, a more balanced approach recognizes the value of multiple ways of knowing. Integrating scientific inquiry with philosophical reflection, artistic expression, and ethical reasoning can lead to a richer understanding of the world. This integrative perspective allows for a more comprehensive exploration of complex issues, acknowledging that not all questions can be answered through empirical research alone.In conclusion, while science plays a crucial role in advancing our understanding of the universe, the philosophy of scientism can limit our appreciation of other valuable forms of knowledge. By embracing a more inclusive approach that values diverse perspectives, we can foster a deeper understanding of ourselves and the world around us. It is essential to recognize that science is not the sole arbiter of truth; rather, it is one of many tools that can help us navigate the complexities of life. Ultimately, a balanced view that respects both scientific inquiry and the richness of human experience will lead to a more profound and nuanced understanding of reality.

在现代世界中，科学对我们日常生活的影响是不可否认的。从技术到医学，科学的进步已经改变了我们的生活、工作和相互交往的方式。然而，这种对科学的压倒性依赖催生了一种哲学立场，称为scientism，它主张科学是所有知识领域的终极权威。虽然科学无疑为我们提供了对自然世界的宝贵见解，但scientism可能导致对人类经验和现实的狭隘理解。术语scientism指的是一种信念，即科学知识优于其他形式的理解，如哲学、艺术或灵性。scientism的支持者认为，实证证据和科学方法是获取知识的唯一有效手段。这种观点可能很有吸引力，尤其在科技和科学突破占据头条的时代。然而，它引发了关于科学自身局限性的重要问题。对scientism的一个重要批评是，它常常忽视那些无法通过科学方法测量的主观经验和定性数据。例如，人类情感、伦理困境和审美判断是我们生活中至关重要的方面，而科学很难量化。通过将科学知识置于首位，scientism冒着边缘化这些人类存在的重要元素的风险。此外，对scientism的严格遵循可能会造成科学与其他学科之间的假性二分法。这种两极分化可能阻碍跨学科合作，而跨学科合作对于解决气候变化、公共卫生危机和社会不平等等复杂全球挑战至关重要。许多这些问题不仅需要科学专业知识，还需要来自人文学科、社会科学和伦理考虑的见解。此外，scientism可能会助长一种智识精英主义的感觉，没有科学背景的个人可能会感到被贬低或排除在有关社会及其未来的有意义讨论之外。这种态度可能削弱多元视角和经验的重要性，而这些对于全面理解和解决问题是必不可少的。与scientism相反，更平衡的方法认识到多种知识方式的价值。将科学探究与哲学反思、艺术表现和伦理推理相结合，可以导致对世界更丰富的理解。这种综合视角允许我们更全面地探索复杂问题，承认并非所有问题都可以仅通过实证研究来解答。总之，尽管科学在推动我们对宇宙的理解中发挥了至关重要的作用，但scientism的哲学可能限制我们对其他有价值知识形式的欣赏。通过采用更加包容的方法，重视多样化的视角，我们可以促进对自己和周围世界的更深刻理解。重要的是要认识到，科学不是真理的唯一仲裁者；相反，它是帮助我们驾驭生活复杂性的众多工具之一。最终，尊重科学探究和人类经验丰富性的平衡观点将导致对现实的更深刻和细致的理解。