ahistorical

简明释义

英[ˌeɪhɪˈstɒrɪkl]美[ˌeɪhɪˈstɔːrɪkl]

adj. 与历史无关的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.This collapses the specific features of what is going on today and turns everything into an ahistorical mess.

这就磨灭了当今时事的特性，把一切事物变得脱离历史而乱七八糟。

2.But the Thames tunnel is ahistorical milestone in tunnel engineering.

但是，泰晤士河隧道是隧道工程历史上的一座里程碑。

3.This collapses the specific features of what is going on today and turns everything into an ahistorical mess.

这就磨灭了当今时事的特性，把一切事物变得脱离历史而乱七八糟。

4.In her analysis, she made several ahistorical assumptions that did not take into account the cultural influences of the era.

在她的分析中，她做出了几个非历史性的假设，这些假设没有考虑到那个时代的文化影响。

5.Critics argue that the textbook presents an ahistorical view of the events, failing to include key perspectives.

批评者认为这本教科书呈现了一个非历史性的事件视角，未能包括关键的观点。

6.The film was entertaining, but its portrayal of the past was quite ahistorical, lacking accuracy and depth.

这部电影很有趣，但它对过去的描绘相当非历史性的，缺乏准确性和深度。

7.The author's approach to the historical event was criticized as ahistorical, meaning it ignored the context of the time.

作者对历史事件的处理被批评为非历史性的，意味着它忽视了当时的背景。

8.His argument was deemed ahistorical because it relied on present-day values rather than historical facts.

他的论点被认为是非历史性的，因为它依赖于当代价值观而不是历史事实。

作文

In contemporary discussions about culture and society, the term ahistorical often arises, particularly when analyzing various narratives that seem disconnected from historical facts. The word ahistorical refers to something that lacks a historical context or is not informed by historical events. This can manifest in literature, film, and even political discourse, where creators or speakers ignore the historical realities that shape their subjects. Understanding the implications of ahistorical perspectives is crucial for anyone seeking to engage critically with cultural products or social arguments.For instance, consider a popular movie that portrays a historical event but takes significant liberties with the facts. Such films may appeal to audiences due to their dramatic narratives or emotional depth. However, they can also propagate ahistorical interpretations that mislead viewers about the actual events. The danger lies in the potential normalization of these distortions, leading people to accept them as truth. This is particularly concerning in an age where misinformation spreads rapidly through social media platforms.Moreover, the concept of ahistorical can be applied to various social movements that may overlook the lessons of the past. For example, activists advocating for change should ideally learn from previous movements to avoid repeating mistakes. When movements adopt an ahistorical stance, they risk alienating those who have fought similar battles before. This can create divisions within communities that should be united in their goals. By neglecting the historical context, activists may also fail to appreciate the progress that has been made, which can lead to disillusionment and frustration.In academia, the critique of ahistorical approaches is prevalent. Scholars often emphasize the importance of historical analysis in understanding current issues. For instance, studying the history of race relations in the United States provides essential insights into contemporary discussions about systemic racism. Ignoring this history would result in an ahistorical viewpoint that fails to recognize the roots of present-day inequalities. Thus, a solid grasp of historical context is vital for meaningful dialogue and effective policy-making.Furthermore, the rise of postmodernism has led to debates about the relevance of history itself. Some argue that the focus on personal narratives and subjective experiences can lead to ahistorical interpretations of events. While personal stories are undoubtedly valuable, they must be situated within a broader historical framework to avoid distortion. This tension between individual experience and collective history highlights the need for a balanced approach to understanding our past.In conclusion, the term ahistorical serves as a reminder of the importance of historical awareness in all aspects of life. Whether we are consuming media, engaging in social activism, or conducting academic research, recognizing the historical context is essential. By doing so, we can foster a more nuanced understanding of our world, allowing us to learn from the past and make informed decisions for the future. Embracing historical knowledge not only enriches our perspectives but also empowers us to create a more just and informed society. Thus, it is imperative that we remain vigilant against ahistorical narratives that seek to simplify or distort the complexities of history.

在当代关于文化和社会的讨论中，术语ahistorical经常出现，特别是在分析那些似乎与历史事实脱节的各种叙事时。这个词ahistorical指的是缺乏历史背景或未受历史事件影响的事物。这种现象可以体现在文学、电影甚至政治话语中，创作者或发言人忽视塑造其主题的历史现实。理解ahistorical观点的影响对于任何希望批判性地参与文化产品或社会论点的人来说都是至关重要的。例如，考虑一部描绘历史事件的热门电影，但对事实进行了重大自由发挥。这类电影可能因其戏剧性的叙事或情感深度而吸引观众。然而，它们也可能传播ahistorical的解释，误导观众对实际事件的理解。危险在于这种扭曲的正常化，导致人们接受这些扭曲为真理。在社交媒体平台上，虚假信息迅速传播的时代，这尤其令人担忧。此外，ahistorical的概念可以应用于各种社会运动，这些运动可能忽略了过去的教训。例如，倡导变革的活动家应当学习以往运动，以避免重蹈覆辙。当运动采取ahistorical立场时，他们可能会疏远那些曾经为类似斗争而奋斗的人。这可能在本应团结一致追求目标的社区内造成分歧。通过忽视历史背景，活动家们也可能未能欣赏已取得的进展，这可能导致失望和挫败感。在学术界，对ahistorical方法的批评很普遍。学者们常常强调历史分析在理解当前问题中的重要性。例如，研究美国种族关系的历史为当代关于系统性种族主义的讨论提供了重要见解。忽视这一历史将导致一种ahistorical的观点，未能认识到当前不平等的根源。因此，扎实掌握历史背景对于有意义的对话和有效的政策制定至关重要。此外，后现代主义的兴起引发了有关历史相关性的辩论。一些人认为，关注个人叙事和主观经验可能导致ahistorical的事件解释。虽然个人故事无疑是有价值的，但它们必须置于更广泛的历史框架内，以避免扭曲。这种个人经验与集体历史之间的紧张关系突显了在理解我们过去时需要采取平衡的方法。总之，术语ahistorical提醒我们在生活的各个方面保持历史意识的重要性。无论我们是在消费媒体、参与社会运动，还是进行学术研究，认识历史背景都是至关重要的。通过这样做，我们可以培养对我们世界的更细致的理解，使我们能够从过去中学习，并为未来做出明智的决策。拥抱历史知识不仅丰富了我们的视角，还使我们能够创造一个更公正和知情的社会。因此，我们必须对那些试图简化或扭曲历史复杂性的ahistorical叙述保持警惕。