armament
简明释义
n. 军备,武器;武装,战备
复 数 a r m a m e n t s
英英释义
一个国家的武器和军事装备。 | |
The process of equipping a military force with weapons and supplies. | 为军事力量配备武器和补给的过程。 |
单词用法
军事武器装备 | |
核武器装备 | |
常规武器装备 | |
裁军 | |
裁军条约 | |
军备竞赛 |
同义词
军事装备 | The country invested heavily in military equipment to bolster its defense. | 该国在军事装备上投入巨资以增强其防御能力。 |
反义词
裁军 | The treaty focused on disarmament to reduce tensions between the countries. | 该条约专注于裁军,以减少国家之间的紧张关系。 | |
和平 | 促进和平对全球稳定至关重要。 |
例句
1.The unit has insufficient armament with which to do battle.
这个分队缺少作战的武器装备。
2.The high tax policy is certainly unpopular, although it's unlikely to meet the soaring armament expenditures.
高赋税政策肯定是不受欢迎的,但也未必能满足飞涨的军备开支。
3.The armament of any of the great power can destroy civilization.
任何大国的军事力量都能摧毁文明世界。
4.The country 's armament will take years.
国家的武装过程需要几年。
5.Armament: Main gun is 30 mm caliber.
武器装备:一门30毫米航炮。
6.In 1937 he was seconded to the Royal Canadian air Force in Ottawa as air armament adviser.
1937年他被临时调往渥太华的加拿大皇家空军担任军备顾问。
7.The general discussed the need for modernizing the nation's armament.
将军讨论了现代化国家武器装备的必要性。
8.Many nations are in an armament race to develop advanced technologies.
许多国家正在进行一场武器装备竞赛,以开发先进技术。
9.International treaties aim to limit the proliferation of nuclear armament.
国际条约旨在限制核武器装备的扩散。
10.The peace agreement included clauses on disarmament and reduction of armament.
和平协议中包括了关于裁军和减少武器装备的条款。
11.The country has been investing heavily in its military armament.
这个国家一直在大力投资其军事武器装备。
作文
In today's world, the concept of armament (武器装备) plays a crucial role in international relations and global security. The term refers to the military weapons and equipment that nations possess for defense and warfare. Throughout history, armament (武器装备) has been a significant factor in determining the balance of power among countries. The arms race during the Cold War is a prime example of how armament (武器装备) can influence political dynamics and create tensions between nations.One of the most notable examples of armament (武器装备) development is the nuclear arms race. After World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in a fierce competition to build more advanced and powerful nuclear weapons. This proliferation of armament (武器装备) not only escalated military tensions but also raised ethical questions about the use of such destructive capabilities. The threat of mutually assured destruction kept both sides in check, but it also highlighted the dangers associated with an ever-increasing stockpile of armament (武器装备).In recent years, the focus on armament (武器装备) has shifted towards modern warfare technologies, including cyber warfare capabilities, drones, and precision-guided munitions. These advancements have changed the nature of conflicts, making them more complex and unpredictable. Countries are now investing heavily in research and development to enhance their armament (武器装备) and maintain a competitive edge over potential adversaries.However, the pursuit of advanced armament (武器装备) raises concerns about global stability. As nations expand their military capabilities, there is a risk of miscalculations or accidental escalations leading to conflict. The international community must engage in dialogue and establish treaties to regulate the production and distribution of armament (武器装备). Efforts like the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) aim to prevent the spread of nuclear armament (武器装备) and promote disarmament, yet challenges remain.Moreover, the impact of armament (武器装备) extends beyond national security. The trade and manufacture of weapons can have significant economic implications, often benefiting certain industries while perpetuating cycles of violence in conflict zones. Countries involved in arms trading may prioritize profit over peace, leading to humanitarian crises and instability in affected regions. Therefore, it is essential for governments to consider the broader consequences of their armament (武器装备) policies.In conclusion, armament (武器装备) is a multifaceted issue that intertwines with global politics, ethics, and economics. As nations continue to develop and acquire military capabilities, it is imperative to foster international cooperation and promote responsible armament (武器装备) practices. Only through collective efforts can we hope to reduce the risks associated with an arms buildup and work towards a more peaceful world.
在当今世界,armament(武器装备)的概念在国际关系和全球安全中发挥着至关重要的作用。这个术语指的是国家为防御和战争所拥有的军事武器和装备。纵观历史,armament(武器装备)一直是决定国家权力平衡的重要因素。冷战期间的军备竞赛就是一个典型例子,说明了armament(武器装备)如何影响政治动态并在国家之间造成紧张局势。最显著的armament(武器装备)发展例子之一是核军备竞赛。二战后,美国和苏联展开了一场激烈的竞争,争相制造更先进、更强大的核武器。这种armament(武器装备)的扩散不仅加剧了军事紧张局势,还引发了关于使用如此破坏性能力的伦理问题。相互确保毁灭的威胁让双方保持克制,但也突显了不断增加的armament(武器装备)库存所带来的危险。近年来,armament(武器装备)关注的重点已转向现代战争技术,包括网络战争能力、无人机和精确制导弹药。这些进展改变了冲突的性质,使其变得更加复杂和不可预测。各国现在正大力投资于研发,以增强其armament(武器装备),并在潜在对手面前保持竞争优势。然而,追求先进的armament(武器装备)引发了全球稳定的担忧。随着国家扩大其军事能力,误判或意外升级导致冲突的风险也在增加。国际社会必须进行对话,并建立条约来规范armament(武器装备)的生产和分配。像《不扩散核武器条约》(NPT)这样的努力旨在防止核armament(武器装备)的扩散并促进裁军,但挑战依然存在。此外,armament(武器装备)的影响超越了国家安全。武器的贸易和制造可能具有重大经济影响,往往使某些行业受益,同时在冲突地区延续暴力循环。参与军火贸易的国家可能会将利润置于和平之上,从而导致人道主义危机和受影响地区的不稳定。因此,各国政府必须考虑其armament(武器装备)政策的更广泛后果。总之,armament(武器装备)是一个多方面的问题,与全球政治、伦理和经济交织在一起。随着各国继续发展和获取军事能力,促进国际合作和推动负责任的armament(武器装备)实践至关重要。只有通过集体努力,我们才能希望减少与军备增长相关的风险,并朝着更加和平的世界迈进。