slating

简明释义

英[ˈsleɪtɪŋ]美[ˈsleɪtɪŋ]

n. 石板瓦；叱责

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.A hearty slating always does me good.

由衷的批评对我常有好处。

2.Sissons' gaffe is not the first time the BBC has come under fire from the royals, with Prince Charles famously caught slating Witchell during a press-call at the ski resort of Klosters in 2005.

西森斯的失礼并不是英国广播公司第一次身陷来自皇家的压力，2005年威切尔在滑雪胜地克罗斯特进行新闻访问时，查尔斯王子大骂记者也非常出名。

3.A heavy slating always does me good.

狠狠地斥责对我常有好处。

4.I'm afraid to go home. My father will give me a regular slating for being out so late.

我真怕回家去，我这么晚还在外面，父亲一定要教训我一顿。

5.Sissons' gaffe is not the first time the BBC has come under fire from the royals, with Prince Charles famously caught slating Witchell during a press-call at the ski resort of Klosters in 2005.

西森斯的失礼并不是英国广播公司第一次身陷来自皇家的压力，2005年威切尔在滑雪胜地克罗斯特进行新闻访问时，查尔斯王子大骂记者也非常出名。

6.Giving him a heavy slating will do him good.

狠狠地斥责他一顿会对他有好处。

7.Fans were slating the band for their disappointing performance at the concert.

粉丝们在批评乐队在音乐会上的失望表现。

8.The newspaper article slated the politician for his controversial statements.

那篇新闻文章抨击了这位政治家的争议性言论。

9.The professor slated the student's paper for its lack of research and analysis.

教授因学生的论文缺乏研究和分析而批评了他。

10.The film critics are slating the new movie for its poor plot and character development.

影评人正在抨击这部新电影，因为它的情节和角色发展很差。

11.After the presentation, several team members started slating the speaker's lack of preparation.

演讲结束后，几位团队成员开始批评演讲者缺乏准备。

作文

In the world of journalism and media, the term slating refers to the act of criticizing or denouncing someone or something, often in a harsh or public manner. This practice can be seen in various forms, including reviews, opinion pieces, and social media commentary. While slating can sometimes be justified, it often raises questions about the responsibility of critics and the impact of their words on individuals and society. Consider the example of a film review. A critic may choose to write a scathing review of a movie, using slating language to express their disappointment or anger. Such reviews can influence public perception and affect the success of the film. However, the question arises: is it fair to judge an entire work based on personal taste? Critics have a platform that can amplify their opinions, but with this power comes the responsibility to provide constructive feedback rather than merely engaging in slating. Moreover, in the age of social media, slating has taken on a new dimension. Anyone with an internet connection can voice their opinions, often without the filters of traditional journalism. While this democratization of criticism can be empowering, it can also lead to a culture of negativity where individuals feel free to attack others without consideration for their feelings or reputations. The impact of such behavior can be damaging, leading to online harassment and a toxic environment. It is essential to recognize that not all criticism is slating. Constructive criticism aims to provide insights that can help improve a work or performance, while slating tends to focus on tearing down rather than building up. For instance, a teacher might critique a student’s essay by pointing out specific areas for improvement, whereas slating would involve simply stating that the essay is terrible without offering any guidance. This distinction is crucial in fostering a culture of growth and learning. Furthermore, slating can also occur in political discourse. Politicians and public figures often find themselves on the receiving end of harsh critiques from opponents and the media. While it is natural for political opponents to challenge each other, slating can lead to a breakdown in civil discourse. Instead of focusing on policies and ideas, discussions can devolve into personal attacks, which do little to inform the public or advance meaningful conversation. In conclusion, while slating can serve as a tool for accountability and expression, it is vital to approach criticism with thoughtfulness and care. The power of words can shape perceptions and influence lives, so it is important to strive for a balance between honesty and empathy. By fostering a culture that values constructive feedback over mere slating, we can create a more supportive and understanding environment in both creative and public spheres.

在新闻和媒体的世界中，术语slating指的是批评或谴责某人或某事的行为，通常以严厉或公开的方式进行。这种做法可以在各种形式中看到，包括评论、观点文章和社交媒体评论。虽然slating有时是合理的，但它常常引发关于批评者责任及其言辞对个人和社会影响的问题。考虑电影评论的例子。评论家可能选择写一篇尖锐的电影评论，使用slating语言来表达他们的失望或愤怒。这种评论可以影响公众看法，并影响电影的成功。然而，问题出现了：仅仅基于个人口味来评判整个作品是否公平？评论家拥有可以放大其意见的平台，但伴随这种权力的是提供建设性反馈而不仅仅是参与slating的责任。此外，在社交媒体时代，slating也呈现出新的维度。任何有互联网连接的人都可以表达自己的意见，往往没有传统新闻的过滤。虽然这种批评的民主化可能是赋权的，但它也可能导致一种消极文化，个人感到自由地攻击他人，而不考虑他们的感受或声誉。这种行为的影响可能是有害的，导致网络骚扰和有毒环境。必须认识到，并非所有的批评都是slating。建设性的批评旨在提供可以帮助改善工作或表现的见解，而slating则往往专注于拆毁而不是建设。例如，一位教师可能会通过指出具体的改进领域来批评学生的论文，而slating则涉及简单地声明论文很糟糕，而不提供任何指导。这一区别对于培养成长和学习的文化至关重要。此外，slating也可以发生在政治话语中。政治家和公众人物经常发现自己受到对手和媒体的严厉批评。虽然对政治对手进行挑战是自然的，但slating可能导致公民话语的崩溃。讨论可以从关注政策和思想退化为人身攻击，这对公众了解信息或推进有意义的对话没有任何帮助。总之，尽管slating可以作为问责和表达的工具，但以深思熟虑和谨慎的态度对待批评至关重要。言辞的力量可以塑造看法并影响生活，因此努力在诚实和同情之间取得平衡非常重要。通过培养一种重视建设性反馈而非单纯的slating的文化，我们可以在创意和公共领域创造一个更具支持性和理解的环境。