precedents

简明释义

英[ˈprɛsɪdənts]美[ˈprɛsɪdənts]

n. 判例；引用单元

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.There are precedents for the success of similar ideas.

还是有很多类似成功的案例的。

2.Mr Tokpakbayev and his supporters point to precedents.

托克帕克巴耶夫和他的支持者举出一些先例。

3.That works fine in similar countries where divorce rules are highly codified, precedents do not matter and judges’ discretion is limited.

这在离婚法相似的国家还行得通，既不参照先例，而且法官的裁量权有限。

4.Primarily made of wood, my furniture seeks to satisfy functional needs while challenging precedents of design and concept.

我的作品基本都是木制品，旨在满足实用性的基础上加入艺术品本身的设计概念。

5.Such realism does have precedents.

这种现实主义做法确实有先例可循。

6.Mr Roberts has a strong preference for making “narrow” decisions that have limited value as precedents.

罗伯茨先生对于做出判例价值有限的“偏狭”决定具有强烈的偏好。

7.The founders of the USA left important precedents.

美国的建立者留下了很多重要的先例（复习：precedent, 取决于pre=before)。

8.But he says there have been precedents.

不过，他说官兵倒戈不是没有先例的。

9.The judge referred to international precedents to make his ruling.

法官引用了国际先例来作出裁决。

10.In this court, past precedents often influence the outcome of new cases.

在这个法庭上，过去的先例通常会影响新案件的结果。

11.The lawyer cited several important precedents to support her case.

律师引用了几个重要的先例来支持她的案件。

12.There are few legal precedents for this type of case.

这种案件几乎没有法律先例。

13.The company’s decision was based on precedents set by previous management.

公司的决定是基于前管理层设定的先例。

作文

In the realm of law and governance, the concept of precedents (先例) plays a crucial role in shaping decisions and guiding future actions. A precedent (先例) is essentially a previous case or legal decision that serves as a rule or example for subsequent cases. This principle is foundational in common law systems, where judges rely on past rulings to maintain consistency and fairness in the judicial process. The reliance on precedents (先例) ensures that similar cases are treated alike, fostering a sense of trust in the legal system.One of the most significant aspects of precedents (先例) is their ability to provide stability and predictability in the law. For instance, when a court decides a case involving a specific legal issue, that decision becomes a guiding reference for future cases. This practice not only helps judges make informed decisions but also allows individuals and businesses to understand the legal landscape better. They can anticipate how the law is likely to apply to their situations based on established precedents (先例). However, the application of precedents (先例) is not without its challenges. As society evolves, so do its values and norms. Sometimes, a precedent (先例) set in the past may no longer be relevant or just. In such cases, courts have the option to overturn or distinguish a precedent (先例), thereby allowing the law to adapt to contemporary standards. This dynamic interplay between adhering to precedents (先例) and evolving legal interpretations is essential for a responsive legal system.Moreover, precedents (先例) can vary significantly between jurisdictions. Different courts may interpret laws differently, leading to a patchwork of legal standards across regions. This inconsistency can create confusion, especially for individuals and businesses operating in multiple jurisdictions. Therefore, understanding the local precedents (先例) is vital for anyone seeking to navigate the legal system effectively.Beyond the legal field, the concept of precedents (先例) extends into various aspects of life, including business, politics, and personal decision-making. In business, companies often look to past successes or failures as precedents (先例) to inform their strategies. By analyzing what worked or didn’t work in previous situations, they can make more informed decisions moving forward. Similarly, in politics, leaders may reference historical precedents (先例) to justify their policies or actions, drawing on examples from the past to strengthen their arguments.In conclusion, precedents (先例) are an integral part of our legal and social frameworks. They provide guidance, ensure consistency, and allow for the evolution of the law in response to changing societal values. Understanding precedents (先例) is essential for anyone engaged in legal matters, as well as for those in business and politics. As we continue to navigate complex issues in our increasingly interconnected world, the lessons learned from past precedents (先例) will undoubtedly shape our future decisions.

在法律和治理的领域中，precedents（先例）的概念在塑造决策和指导未来行动方面发挥着至关重要的作用。precedent（先例）本质上是指一个先前的案件或法律决定，它作为后续案件的规则或示例。这一原则在普通法体系中是基础性原则，法官依赖于过去的裁决来保持司法过程中的一致性和公平性。对precedents（先例）的依赖确保了类似案件得到相似的对待，从而在法律系统中培养了信任感。precedents（先例）最显著的一个方面是它们在法律中提供稳定性和可预测性。例如，当法院裁定涉及特定法律问题的案件时，该决定成为未来案件的指导参考。这一做法不仅帮助法官作出明智的决定，还使个人和企业能够更好地理解法律环境。他们可以根据既定的precedents（先例）预见法律可能如何适用于他们的情况。然而，precedents（先例）的应用并非没有挑战。随着社会的发展，其价值观和规范也在变化。有时，过去设定的precedent（先例）可能不再相关或公正。在这种情况下，法院有选择推翻或区分某个precedent（先例）的选项，从而允许法律适应当代标准。这种遵循precedents（先例）与演变法律解释之间的动态互动对于响应性的法律系统至关重要。此外，precedents（先例）在不同的管辖区之间可能会有显著差异。不同的法院可能会以不同的方式解释法律，导致各地区法律标准的拼凑。因此，对于希望有效导航法律系统的任何人来说，理解当地的precedents（先例）至关重要。除了法律领域，precedents（先例）的概念还扩展到生活的各个方面，包括商业、政治和个人决策。在商业中，公司通常会将过去的成功或失败视为precedents（先例）来指导其战略。通过分析以前情况中有效或无效的做法，他们可以在未来做出更明智的决定。类似地，在政治中，领导者可能会引用历史precedents（先例）来证明其政策或行动的合理性，借用过去的例子来增强他们的论点。总之，precedents（先例）是我们法律和社会框架中不可或缺的一部分。它们提供指导，确保一致性，并允许法律在回应社会价值变化时演变。理解precedents（先例）对于参与法律事务的人，以及从事商业和政治的人来说都是至关重要的。随着我们继续在日益互联的世界中应对复杂问题，过去precedents（先例）所传达的教训无疑将塑造我们未来的决策。