bowdlerization

简明释义

英[ˌbaʊdləraɪˈzeɪʃən]美[ˌbaʊdlərɪˈzeʃən]

n. 任意删改

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Ignoring of the interchangeable words often engenders many problems, such as wrong bowdlerization, wrong punctuation, wrong translation.

不明通假往往造成误删、误改、误点、误译、误点复误译、滥用等方面的问题。

2.Ignoring of the interchangeable words often engenders many problems, such as wrong bowdlerization, wrong punctuation, wrong translation.

不明通假往往造成误删、误改、误点、误译、误点复误译、滥用等方面的问题。

3.Some educators argue that bowdlerization in literature can lead to a misunderstanding of historical contexts.

一些教育工作者认为，文学中的删节可能导致对历史背景的误解。

4.The film adaptation was criticized for its bowdlerization of key themes that were present in the book.

这部电影改编因对书中重要主题的删节而受到批评。

5.The bowdlerization of Shakespeare's plays has sparked debates among literary scholars.

莎士比亚戏剧的删节引发了文学学者之间的辩论。

6.Many classic novels have faced bowdlerization over the years to make them more suitable for younger audiences.

许多经典小说多年来经历了删节，以使其更适合年轻读者。

7.The author's original work was subjected to bowdlerization, removing all the explicit content.

作者的原作经历了删节，删除了所有露骨的内容。

作文

The concept of bowdlerization has been a topic of considerable debate in literary circles. The term originates from Thomas Bowdler, who in the early 19th century published an expurgated version of Shakespeare's works, aiming to make them more palatable for women and children. This act of removing or altering content deemed inappropriate raises important questions about censorship, artistic integrity, and cultural values. In today’s society, where access to literature is more widespread than ever, the implications of bowdlerization are particularly relevant. One of the most significant issues surrounding bowdlerization is the potential loss of meaning and context in a work. When original texts are altered, the author's intent can be obscured, leading to a diluted or skewed interpretation of the material. For instance, consider a classic novel that addresses complex themes such as love, betrayal, and morality. If certain passages are removed or modified to avoid controversy, readers may miss out on crucial insights that contribute to the overall narrative. This is particularly concerning in educational settings, where students are encouraged to engage with challenging ideas and develop critical thinking skills.Moreover, bowdlerization can reflect societal norms and values at a given time. What was once considered inappropriate might later be viewed as a necessary part of the conversation. This evolution highlights the subjective nature of censorship. For example, many literary works from previous centuries contain language and themes that are now considered offensive. While it may seem reasonable to modify these texts for contemporary audiences, one must consider whether such actions erase important historical contexts and lessons. In recent years, the advent of digital media has further complicated the issue of bowdlerization. With platforms like Amazon and Goodreads, readers have access to countless reviews and interpretations of texts. This democratization of literary criticism means that readers can choose how they engage with a work, potentially bypassing bowdlerization altogether. However, it also raises concerns about the proliferation of versions that cater to specific ideological perspectives, which can lead to a fragmented understanding of literature.Ultimately, the discussion around bowdlerization invites us to reflect on our values as a society. Should we prioritize protecting individuals from potentially harmful content, or should we uphold the integrity of artistic expression? Striking a balance between these two positions is no easy task. Many argue that exposure to diverse viewpoints, even those that challenge our beliefs, is essential for personal growth and societal progress.In conclusion, the phenomenon of bowdlerization serves as a reminder of the power of language and the responsibility that comes with it. As we navigate an increasingly complex cultural landscape, it is vital to engage with literature in its original form whenever possible, allowing for a richer understanding of the human experience. By doing so, we honor the voices of authors throughout history while fostering an environment where difficult conversations can occur. The ongoing dialogue surrounding bowdlerization will undoubtedly continue, shaping how future generations interact with the written word.

“bowdlerization”这个概念在文学界引发了大量争论。该术语源于19世纪初的托马斯·博德勒，他出版了莎士比亚作品的删节版，旨在使其更适合女性和儿童。这种删除或更改被认为不当的内容的行为引发了关于审查制度、艺术完整性和文化价值的重要问题。在当今社会，文学的获取比以往任何时候都更加广泛，bowdlerization的影响尤为相关。围绕bowdlerization的一个重要问题是作品中意义和上下文的潜在丧失。当原始文本被修改时，作者的意图可能会被模糊，从而导致对材料的解释被稀释或扭曲。例如，考虑一部经典小说，该小说探讨了爱、背叛和道德等复杂主题。如果某些段落被删除或修改以避免争议，读者可能会错过对整体叙事至关重要的洞察。这在教育环境中尤其令人担忧，因为学生被鼓励接触挑战性的思想并发展批判性思维能力。此外，bowdlerization可以反映出特定时代的社会规范和价值观。曾经被视为不当的内容可能会被视为对话的必要部分。这种演变突显了审查制度的主观性。例如，许多来自前几个世纪的文学作品包含了现在被认为是冒犯性的语言和主题。虽然为了当代观众修改这些文本似乎合理，但必须考虑这样的行为是否会抹去重要的历史背景和教训。近年来，数字媒体的出现进一步复杂化了bowdlerization的问题。随着亚马逊和Goodreads等平台的出现，读者可以访问无数的评论和文本解读。这种文学批评的民主化意味着读者可以选择如何与作品互动，从而可能完全绕过bowdlerization。然而，这也引发了关于迎合特定意识形态观点的版本泛滥的担忧，这可能导致对文学的片面理解。最终，围绕bowdlerization的讨论邀请我们反思作为一个社会的价值观。我们应该优先保护个人免受潜在有害内容的影响，还是应该维护艺术表达的完整性？在这两种立场之间找到平衡并非易事。许多人认为，接触多样的观点，即使是那些挑战我们信仰的观点，对于个人成长和社会进步至关重要。总之，bowdlerization现象提醒我们语言的力量以及随之而来的责任。在我们导航日益复杂的文化格局时，尽可能以原始形式接触文学至关重要，让我们对人类经验有更丰富的理解。通过这样做，我们尊重历史上作者的声音，同时培养一个可以进行艰难对话的环境。围绕bowdlerization的持续对话无疑将继续塑造未来几代人与书面文字的互动。