dicta
简明释义
n. 格言;权威的断言(dictum 的复数)
英英释义
A formal statement or pronouncement, especially in legal contexts. | 正式声明或公告,特别是在法律背景下。 |
权威或教条式的意见表达。 |
单词用法
附带意见 | |
法院的陈述 | |
法律陈述 | |
司法陈述 |
同义词
格言 | The ancient philosophers often shared their dicta on ethics and morality. | 古代哲学家们常常分享他们关于伦理和道德的格言。 |
反义词
行动 | 行动胜于言辞。 | ||
行为 | 每个行为都有其后果。 |
例句
1.First, the Court indicated in dicta that this consideration could be made as part of the issuance of the individual EIS governing each site.
首先,法院在法官的意见中表明,这种考虑可以作为颁布涉及每个矿场的单个“环境影响报告书”的一部分。
2.If a court does not have the power to hear a case, it will not issue dicta.
如果一个法院没有权力去听一个案例中,它将不会发布顶礼膜拜。
3.First, the Court indicated in dicta that this consideration could be made as part of the issuance of the individual EIS governing each site.
首先,法院在法官的意见中表明,这种考虑可以作为颁布涉及每个矿场的单个“环境影响报告书”的一部分。
4.One of my favourite dicta is that people should not be categorized as good or evil, wise or stupid.
我最喜欢的其中一个格言是“不应以好坏善恶、智愚贤劣来把人分类”。
5.Let's look at a hypothetical example of how we might try to separate holding from dicta.
让我们看一个假设案件,以此来探讨如何区分判决和法官附带意见。
6.Such dicta vary in weight and importance .
这样的意见在影响力和重要性方面都存在着差异。
7.Related to the concept of binding and persuasive authority is the distinction between holding and dicta.
与约束性效力和说服性效力这样一对概念相联系的是案件的判决和法官附带意见之间的差异。
8.The article analyzed the dicta presented in the Supreme Court's decision.
这篇文章分析了最高法院裁决中提出的dicta。
9.Legal scholars often debate the implications of judicial dicta in landmark cases.
法律学者们经常讨论标志性案件中司法dicta的影响。
10.The judge's ruling included several important dicta that clarified the legal principles involved.
法官的裁决中包含了几个重要的dicta,阐明了涉及的法律原则。
11.The book is filled with dicta that challenge conventional wisdom.
这本书充满了挑战传统智慧的dicta。
12.In his speech, the professor included many dicta from famous philosophers to support his argument.
在他的演讲中,教授引用了许多著名哲学家的dicta来支持他的论点。
作文
In the realm of law and philosophy, the term dicta refers to statements or remarks made by judges in their opinions that are not essential to the decision of the case. These remarks, while often insightful, do not have the binding authority of the court's ruling. Understanding the distinction between dicta and the actual holding of a case is crucial for legal practitioners and scholars alike. Dicta can provide valuable context and illustrate the reasoning behind a judge's decision, yet they should be approached with caution when being cited as precedent.The significance of dicta extends beyond the legal field; it also permeates philosophical discourse. In philosophy, dicta can refer to authoritative statements or principles that guide ethical or moral reasoning. For instance, a philosopher might propose a dictum regarding the nature of justice, which, while not universally accepted, can influence subsequent debates and discussions.Moreover, the role of dicta in both law and philosophy highlights the importance of interpretation. Legal systems rely on the precise interpretation of statutes and case law, where dicta may offer insight into a judge's mindset but do not hold the same weight as the core ruling. Similarly, in philosophy, the interpretation of dicta can lead to various schools of thought and differing opinions on fundamental issues.To illustrate the impact of dicta, consider a landmark Supreme Court case. The majority opinion may contain several dicta that reflect the justices' views on broader societal implications, even if those views do not directly affect the legal outcome of the case. Legal scholars often analyze these dicta to understand the evolving landscape of law and how judicial perspectives shape future rulings.In everyday conversation, the concept of dicta can also be applied metaphorically. When someone shares an opinion or a piece of advice that is not necessarily grounded in fact but reflects their personal beliefs, it could be viewed as a form of dicta. For example, a mentor might offer guidance that resonates with their own experiences, but it may not apply universally to all situations. This illustrates how dicta can influence behavior and decision-making, even outside formal contexts.Furthermore, the study of dicta encourages critical thinking. By examining the non-binding statements made in judicial opinions or philosophical texts, individuals can engage in deeper analysis and discussion. This process fosters a richer understanding of the subject matter and encourages one to question established norms and ideas.In conclusion, the term dicta encompasses a range of meanings across different fields, from law to philosophy and beyond. Recognizing the nuances of dicta allows for a more comprehensive understanding of legal principles and philosophical arguments. Whether in a courtroom or a classroom, dicta serves as a reminder of the complexity of interpretation and the importance of context in shaping our understanding of truth and authority. As we navigate through various discourses, being mindful of dicta will enhance our ability to engage thoughtfully and critically with diverse perspectives.
在法律和哲学领域,术语dicta指的是法官在其意见中发表的声明或评论,这些声明对案件的决定并不至关重要。这些评论虽然常常富有洞察力,但并不具有法院裁决的约束力。理解dicta与案件实际裁决之间的区别,对于法律从业者和学者而言至关重要。Dicta可以提供有价值的背景,并说明法官裁决背后的推理,但在引用为先例时应谨慎处理。Dicta的重要性超越了法律领域;它也渗透到哲学讨论中。在哲学中,dicta可以指引导伦理或道德推理的权威性陈述或原则。例如,一位哲学家可能会提出关于正义本质的dictum,虽然并未被普遍接受,但能够影响随后的辩论和讨论。此外,dicta在法律和哲学中的作用强调了解释的重要性。法律体系依赖于对法规和判例法的精确解释,在此过程中,dicta可能提供对法官心态的见解,但并不具备与核心裁决相同的分量。同样,在哲学中,对dicta的解释可能导致各种思潮和对基本问题的不同看法。为了说明dicta的影响,考虑一个具有里程碑意义的最高法院案件。多数意见中可能包含若干dicta,反映法官对更广泛社会影响的看法,即使这些看法并不直接影响案件的法律结果。法律学者常常分析这些dicta,以理解法律的演变及司法观点如何塑造未来的裁决。在日常对话中,dicta的概念也可以比喻性地应用。当某人分享一种观点或建议,这种观点或建议并不一定建立在事实之上,而反映了他们的个人信仰时,可以视为一种dicta。例如,一位导师可能会提供与其自身经历产生共鸣的指导,但这可能并不普遍适用于所有情况。这说明了dicta如何影响行为和决策,即使在正式场合之外。此外,研究dicta鼓励批判性思维。通过审视司法意见或哲学文本中非约束性的陈述,个人可以进行更深入的分析和讨论。这个过程促进了对主题的更丰富理解,并鼓励人们质疑既定规范和观念。总之,术语dicta在不同领域中涵盖了一系列含义,从法律到哲学及其他。认识到dicta的细微差别,使我们能够更全面地理解法律原则和哲学论点。无论是在法庭还是教室中,dicta都提醒我们解释的复杂性以及上下文在塑造我们对真理和权威的理解中的重要性。当我们在各种话语中穿行时,关注dicta将增强我们以深思熟虑和批判性方式与不同观点互动的能力。