sharecrop

简明释义

英[ˈʃeəˌkrɒp]美[ˈʃerˌkrɑp]

vt. 作佃农耕种；收益分成耕种

vi. 作佃农耕种；收益分成耕种

第 三 人 称 单 数 s h a r e c r o p s

现 在 分 词 s h a r e c r o p p i n g

过 去 式 s h a r e c r o p p e d

过 去 分 词 s h a r e c r o p p e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Many families in the South used to sharecrop 佃农 during the post-Civil War era.

南方许多家庭在内战后时期曾经做<sharecrop>佃农。

2.In the early 1900s, many African American families became sharecroppers 佃农 in the rural South.

在20世纪初，许多非裔美国家庭成为南方乡村的sharecrop 佃农。

3.After losing their land, they had no choice but to sharecrop 佃农 on someone else's farm.

失去土地后，他们别无选择，只能在别人农场做sharecrop 佃农。

4.The system of sharecropping 佃农制度 often led to cycles of debt for the farmers.

这种sharecropping 佃农制度往往导致农民陷入债务循环。

5.The sharecrop 佃农 agreement allowed farmers to cultivate land in exchange for a portion of the crops.

这个sharecrop 佃农协议允许农民耕种土地，以换取一部分农作物。

作文

The history of agriculture is rich and varied, reflecting the social and economic conditions of different eras. One significant aspect of this history is the practice of sharecrop, which has played a crucial role in shaping rural communities, particularly in the United States after the Civil War. Sharecrop (分成耕作) is an agricultural system where a landowner allows a tenant to use the land in exchange for a share of the crops produced. This arrangement was initially seen as a solution for both landowners who needed labor and former slaves who sought work and independence. However, the reality of sharecrop was often fraught with challenges and inequities.In the aftermath of the Civil War, many freed African Americans found themselves without land or resources. The sharecrop system offered a way for them to work the land and earn a living. They would rent small plots from landowners and, in return for their labor, they would give a portion of their harvest back to the owner. This system, however, was not as fair as it might seem. Many sharecrop agreements were exploitative, with landowners setting unfair terms that left tenants in perpetual debt. This created a cycle of poverty that was difficult to escape.Moreover, the sharecrop system perpetuated racial inequalities in the South. White landowners often held the power in these arrangements, leaving African American sharecroppers with little recourse against unfair practices. The lack of legal protections and the systemic racism of the time meant that many sharecroppers were trapped in a system that favored the wealthy elite. As a result, while sharecrop provided a means of survival for many, it also reinforced existing social hierarchies.The economic implications of sharecrop were significant. While it allowed for some agricultural production, it did not lead to wealth accumulation for the majority of sharecroppers. Instead, many ended up in a cycle of debt, as they had to borrow money for seeds, tools, and other necessities from landowners or local merchants. The high interest rates on these loans made it nearly impossible for them to break free from this cycle.Despite its flaws, the sharecrop system did contribute to the agricultural economy of the South. It allowed for the cultivation of cotton and other crops, which were vital to the region's economy. Over time, however, changes in agricultural practices and the rise of mechanization led to the decline of sharecropping. Many sharecroppers moved away from rural areas in search of better opportunities, leading to urban migration and significant demographic shifts.In conclusion, the practice of sharecrop has left a lasting legacy on American agriculture and society. While it provided opportunities for some, it also highlighted the deep-rooted issues of inequality and exploitation. Understanding the complexities of sharecropping helps us appreciate the historical struggles faced by many rural communities and the ongoing challenges related to land ownership and economic justice today. The lessons learned from the past can inform current discussions about agricultural policies and the rights of workers in the farming industry.

农业历史丰富多彩，反映了不同时代的社会和经济条件。其中一个重要方面是分成耕作的实践，它在塑造农村社区方面发挥了重要作用，特别是在美国内战后。分成耕作是一种农业系统，土地所有者允许租户使用土地，以换取所生产作物的一部分。这种安排最初被视为土地所有者需要劳动力和前奴隶寻求工作与独立的解决方案。然而，分成耕作的现实往往充满挑战和不公。在内战结束后，许多获得自由的非洲裔美国人发现自己没有土地或资源。分成耕作系统为他们提供了一种耕作土地和谋生的方式。他们会向土地所有者租用小块土地，作为对其劳动的回报，他们将一部分收成归还给所有者。然而，这种制度并不像看起来那么公平。许多分成耕作协议都是剥削性的，土地所有者设定不公平的条款，使租户陷入永久债务。这造成了一种难以逃脱的贫困循环。此外，分成耕作制度在南方延续了种族不平等。白人土地所有者通常在这些安排中拥有权力，使非洲裔美国分成耕作者几乎没有对抗不公平做法的手段。缺乏法律保护和当时的系统性种族主义意味着许多分成耕作者被困在有利于富裕精英的制度中。因此，尽管分成耕作为许多人提供了生存的手段，但它也强化了现有的社会等级。分成耕作的经济影响也很显著。虽然它允许一些农业生产，但并没有为大多数分成耕作者带来财富积累。相反，许多人陷入债务循环，因为他们不得不向土地所有者或当地商人借钱购买种子、工具和其他必需品。这些贷款的高利率使他们几乎不可能摆脱这一循环。尽管存在缺陷，分成耕作制度确实为南方的农业经济做出了贡献。它允许棉花和其他作物的种植，这对该地区的经济至关重要。然而，随着农业实践的变化和机械化的兴起，分成耕作逐渐衰退。许多分成耕作者为了寻找更好的机会而搬离农村地区，导致城市迁移和显著的人口变化。总之，分成耕作的做法对美国农业和社会留下了持久的遗产。虽然它为一些人提供了机会，但它也突显了不平等和剥削的根深蒂固问题。理解分成耕作的复杂性有助于我们欣赏许多农村社区面临的历史斗争以及与土地所有权和经济正义相关的持续挑战。我们从过去学到的教训可以为当前关于农业政策和农场工人权利的讨论提供参考。