vitriolize

简明释义

英[ˈvɪtrɪəˌlaɪz]美[ˈvɪtrɪəlˌaɪz]

vt. 使……硫酸化；用硫酸处理

第 三 人 称 单 数 v i t r i o l i z e s

现 在 分 词 v i t r i o l i z i n g

过 去 式 v i t r i o l i z e d

过 去 分 词 v i t r i o l i z e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The article was filled with instances where the author would vitriolize opposing viewpoints.

这篇文章充满了作者对反对观点的恶意攻击的例子。

2.In heated debates, some participants vitriolize their opponents instead of discussing the issues at hand.

在激烈的辩论中，一些参与者会恶毒攻击对手，而不是讨论当前的问题。

3.It's disheartening to see how easily people vitriolize those who disagree with them online.

看到人们在网上如此轻易地抨击不同意见的人，令人感到沮丧。

4.The critics tend to vitriolize the director's work, often focusing on his personal life rather than the film itself.

评论家们往往会抨击导演的作品，常常关注他的个人生活而不是电影本身。

5.Social media platforms can amplify voices that vitriolize public figures without any accountability.

社交媒体平台可以放大那些对公众人物恶语相向的声音，而不需要承担任何责任。

作文

In today's world, where social media dominates our communication, the tendency to vitriolize others has become alarmingly common. People often resort to harsh criticism and personal attacks, cloaked in the anonymity of online platforms. This behavior not only reflects a lack of empathy but also contributes to a toxic environment that can affect mental health and societal cohesion. The term vitriolize means to criticize someone in a very harsh and bitter manner, often with the intent to belittle or demean them. It is derived from 'vitriol,' which refers to something caustic or corrosive, much like the words used in vitriolic commentary.To illustrate this point, consider a recent incident involving a public figure who made a controversial statement. Instead of engaging in constructive dialogue, many individuals took to social media to vitriolize the person, attacking their character rather than discussing the merits of their argument. Comments ranged from derogatory insults to threats, reflecting a complete disregard for respectful discourse.This phenomenon is not limited to public figures; it permeates everyday interactions. Friends, family members, and even colleagues can find themselves on the receiving end of vitriolized remarks during disagreements. Such exchanges can escalate quickly, leading to long-lasting rifts in relationships. It raises the question: why do we feel compelled to engage in such destructive behavior?One reason is that the digital age has fostered a culture of immediacy and impulsiveness. With the click of a button, people can share their thoughts without considering the consequences. The lack of face-to-face interaction diminishes the emotional weight of our words, making it easier to vitriolize someone without feeling the impact of our statements.Moreover, societal norms often reward sensationalism over substance. In an effort to garner attention, individuals may choose to vitriolize others, believing that outrage will lead to increased engagement or followers. This creates a vicious cycle, where negativity breeds more negativity, and constructive conversations are drowned out by the noise of insults and hostility.To combat this trend, it is essential to promote empathy and understanding in our communications. By recognizing the power of our words, we can choose to uplift rather than tear down. Engaging in thoughtful discussions, even when we disagree, allows us to challenge ideas without resorting to vitriolized language. It is crucial to remember that behind every screen is a human being deserving of respect.In conclusion, the act of vitriolizeing others is a harmful practice that undermines the foundations of healthy communication. As we navigate the complexities of modern interactions, let us strive to foster a culture that values kindness and constructive criticism over bitterness and hostility. By doing so, we can create a more compassionate society, where differences are celebrated rather than attacked. Only then can we hope to move beyond the corrosive nature of vitriolized discourse and build bridges instead of walls.

在当今世界，社交媒体主导着我们的沟通，vitriolize他人的倾向变得令人担忧。人们常常在在线平台的匿名保护下诉诸于严厉的批评和人身攻击。这种行为不仅反映了缺乏同情心，还导致了一种有毒的环境，可能影响心理健康和社会凝聚力。vitriolize这个词的意思是以非常严厉和尖刻的方式批评某人，通常带有贬低或羞辱他们的意图。它源自“vitriol”，指的是某种腐蚀性或腐蚀性的东西，就像用尖刻评论表达的言辞一样。为了说明这一点，考虑最近涉及一位公共人物的事件，他发表了一项有争议的声明。许多人没有参与建设性的对话，而是选择在社交媒体上对这位人士进行vitriolize，攻击他们的品格，而不是讨论他们论点的优劣。评论从贬损性的侮辱到威胁不等，反映出对尊重对话的完全漠视。这种现象并不仅限于公众人物；它渗透到日常互动中。朋友、家人甚至同事在争论中也可能成为vitriolize言辞的受害者。这种交流很快就会升级，导致关系的长期裂痕。这引发了一个问题：为什么我们感到有必要参与这种破坏性的行为？一个原因是数字时代培养了一种即时性和冲动的文化。只需点击一个按钮，人们就可以分享自己的想法，而无需考虑后果。面对面的互动缺乏，使我们的话语情感重量减轻，使得对某人进行vitriolize变得更容易，而不会感受到我们陈述的影响。此外，社会规范往往奖励耸人听闻而非实质内容。为了吸引注意力，个人可能选择对他人进行vitriolize，认为愤怒会导致更多的参与或关注者。这创造了一个恶性循环，消极情绪滋生更多的消极情绪，建设性的对话被侮辱和敌意的噪音淹没。为了对抗这一趋势，促进同理心和理解至关重要。通过认识到我们言辞的力量，我们可以选择提升而不是贬低。即使在意见不合时，参与深思熟虑的讨论也能让我们挑战观点，而不诉诸于vitriolize的语言。必须记住，每个屏幕后面都是一个值得尊重的人。总之，vitriolize他人是一种有害的行为，破坏了健康沟通的基础。当我们在现代互动的复杂性中航行时，让我们努力培养一种重视善良和建设性批评而非苦涩和敌意的文化。通过这样做，我们可以创造一个更加富有同情心的社会，在这里差异被庆祝而不是攻击。只有这样，我们才能希望超越vitriolize言辞的腐蚀性本质，建立桥梁而不是墙壁。