arguer

简明释义

英[ˈɑːɡjuːə(r)]美[ˈɑrɡjʊər]

n. 争辩者；辩论者

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.But critics of online relationships arguer that no one can truly know another person in cyberspace.

但是网络恋情的批评者认为没有人能够真正在网络空间认识一个人。

2.This argument is unconvincing because the arguer reaches the conclusion based on faulty logic.

这一论证缺乏说服力，因为论证者所得出的结论是基于错误的逻辑。

3.By failing to address these possibilities, the arguer has presented an unconvincing argument.

由于没有探究这些可能性，论述者所摆出的这段论述便失去了说服力。

4.Definition: in false dichotomy, the arguer sets up the situation so it looks like there are only two choices.

定义：在这类谬误里，论者叙述的情形，似乎只有唯一一种二选一的情况。

5.Additionally, the arguer states that soy contains phytochemicals called isoflavones, which supposedly have disease-preventing properties.

此外，论述者陈述道，大豆含有一种可被称为异黄酮的植物化学物，据称具有防病功效。

6.What a shifty arguer he is, refusing ever to give a straight answer.

他真是个狡诈的辩论家，总是拒绝给出直截了当的回答。

7.When an arguer argues dispassionately he thinks only of the argument.

当一个辩论者不动感情于争辩，他只是为争辩而辩。

8.The lawyer had to arguer 争论 his case convincingly in front of the jury.

律师必须在陪审团面前有说服力地争论他的案件。

9.During the debate, she tended to arguer 争论 every point with great passion.

在辩论中，她倾向于争论每一个观点，充满热情。

10.They often arguer 争论 about which movie to watch on Friday nights.

他们经常在周五晚上争论看哪部电影。

11.He was known to arguer 争论 about politics at every family gathering.

他在每次家庭聚会上都以争论政治而闻名。

12.It's not productive to arguer 争论 over trivial matters.

在琐事上争论没有建设性。

作文

In today's world, the ability to communicate effectively is more important than ever. One of the key aspects of communication is the art of argumentation. An effective arguer争论者 can present their ideas clearly and persuasively, which is essential in both personal and professional settings. This essay will explore the characteristics of a good arguer争论者, the importance of understanding different perspectives, and how to engage in constructive debates.First and foremost, a successful arguer争论者 possesses strong critical thinking skills. They can analyze information, identify logical fallacies, and construct well-reasoned arguments. For instance, when discussing controversial topics such as climate change or political policies, a good arguer争论者 will rely on credible sources and data to support their claims. They understand that emotional appeals alone are not sufficient; rather, they must provide solid evidence to convince their audience.Moreover, a proficient arguer争论者 is also an active listener. They recognize that effective communication is a two-way street. By listening attentively to opposing viewpoints, they can better understand the concerns and motivations of others. This practice not only helps in addressing counterarguments but also fosters mutual respect among participants in a discussion. For example, during a debate about education reform, a skilled arguer争论者 might acknowledge the merits of the opposing side's position before presenting their own arguments. This approach demonstrates open-mindedness and enhances the overall quality of the discourse.Additionally, a good arguer争论者 knows how to remain calm and composed, even in heated discussions. Emotions can run high during debates, especially when discussing sensitive issues. However, maintaining a level-headed demeanor allows the arguer争论者 to articulate their points more effectively and avoid unnecessary conflicts. For example, if a disagreement arises about healthcare policies, a composed arguer争论者 can steer the conversation back to the facts and figures, rather than letting it devolve into personal attacks or emotional outbursts.Furthermore, being a successful arguer争论者 involves recognizing the importance of empathy in discussions. Understanding the emotional context behind someone's argument can lead to more productive conversations. A good arguer争论者 will strive to connect with their audience on a personal level, acknowledging their feelings and experiences. This empathetic approach can help bridge gaps between differing opinions and create a more inclusive environment for dialogue.Lastly, it is crucial for an arguer争论者 to be adaptable. Different situations call for different styles of argumentation. In some cases, a more formal approach may be necessary, while in others, a casual tone might be more effective. Being able to adjust one's style depending on the audience and context is a valuable skill for any arguer争论者. For instance, when presenting in a classroom setting, a structured and detailed argument may be expected, whereas in a casual discussion among friends, a more relaxed and conversational style may be appropriate.In conclusion, the role of an arguer争论者 is multifaceted and requires a combination of critical thinking, active listening, emotional regulation, empathy, and adaptability. By honing these skills, individuals can become more effective communicators and contribute positively to discussions in various contexts. Ultimately, the goal of any arguer争论者 should be to foster understanding and collaboration, rather than simply winning an argument. Through respectful and constructive dialogue, we can navigate complex issues and work towards solutions that benefit everyone.