sophister

简明释义

英[ˈsɒfɪstə(r)]美[ˈsɑːfɪstər]

n. 诡辨家；大学的二（三）年级学生

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Is he a freshman or a sophister?

他是大一的还是大二的？

2.Is he a freshman or a sophister?

他是大一的还是大二的？

3.A good lawyer should avoid becoming a sophister 狡辩者 and instead focus on the facts of the case.

一位优秀的律师应该避免成为sophister 狡辩者，而应专注于案件的事实。

4.She realized that her friend was acting like a sophister 狡辩者, trying to manipulate the situation to his advantage.

她意识到她的朋友像个sophister 狡辩者，试图操控局势以获得优势。

5.The politician's speech was filled with sophister 狡辩者 tactics, making it hard to discern the truth.

这位政治家的演讲充满了sophister 狡辩者的策略，使人难以分辨真相。

6.In his lecture, the professor warned against the tactics of a sophister 狡辩者 who twists facts for personal gain.

在他的讲座中，教授警告要提防那些为了个人利益而扭曲事实的sophister 狡辩者。

7.The debate team accused their opponent of being a sophister 狡辩者, using misleading arguments to win.

辩论队指责对手是一个sophister 狡辩者，使用误导性的论点来获胜。

作文

In the realm of rhetoric and debate, the term sophister refers to a person who uses clever but fallacious reasoning. This word is derived from the ancient Greek term 'sophist', which originally denoted a wise person or teacher. However, over time, the connotation shifted to imply someone who employs deceptive arguments to persuade others. The art of persuasion is essential in many aspects of life, from politics to personal relationships, but the use of sophister tactics can lead to manipulation rather than genuine understanding.In modern society, we often encounter sophisters in various forms, especially in media and politics. They may present themselves as experts, using complex language and intricate arguments to sway public opinion. For instance, during election campaigns, politicians often employ sophister strategies to make their opponents appear less credible. By twisting facts or presenting information out of context, they create a narrative that serves their interests, regardless of its truthfulness.The danger of sophister reasoning lies in its ability to obscure the truth. When individuals rely on such tactics, it becomes challenging for the audience to discern what is factual and what is merely a clever manipulation of words. This is particularly concerning in an age where misinformation spreads rapidly through social media platforms. People may unknowingly become victims of sophister arguments, leading to misguided beliefs and decisions.To combat the influence of sophisters, critical thinking skills are paramount. Educating ourselves on logical fallacies and the principles of sound reasoning can empower us to identify when someone is employing sophister tactics. For example, recognizing ad hominem attacks—where one attacks the character of the opponent instead of addressing the argument—can help us stay focused on the issues at hand rather than being distracted by personal insults.Moreover, fostering open dialogues and encouraging diverse perspectives can mitigate the impact of sophister reasoning. When people engage in discussions with the intent to understand rather than to win an argument, the potential for sophister tactics diminishes. It is vital to create environments where individuals feel safe to express their thoughts without fear of manipulation or ridicule.In conclusion, while the art of persuasion is a valuable skill, it is crucial to be aware of the methods employed by sophisters. Recognizing and challenging their arguments can lead to more informed and honest discussions. As we navigate through the complexities of communication in our daily lives, let us strive to uphold integrity and clarity, ensuring that our interactions are rooted in truth rather than deception. By doing so, we can foster a society where genuine understanding prevails over the cunning tactics of sophisters.

在修辞和辩论的领域，术语sophister指的是一个使用巧妙但谬误推理的人。这个词源于古希腊词汇'sophist'，最初指代智慧的人或教师。然而，随着时间的推移，这个词的含义转变为暗示某人利用欺骗性的论证来说服他人。说服的艺术在生活的许多方面都是至关重要的，从政治到个人关系，但使用sophister策略可能导致操控而非真正的理解。在现代社会，我们经常以各种形式遇到sophisters，尤其是在媒体和政治中。他们可能表现得像专家，使用复杂的语言和错综复杂的论点来影响公众舆论。例如，在选举活动中，政治家们往往采用sophister策略使对手看起来不那么可信。通过扭曲事实或将信息断章取义，他们创造出一个服务于自己利益的叙述，而不管其真实性如何。sophister推理的危险在于它能够掩盖真相。当个人依赖这种策略时，听众很难辨别什么是事实，什么仅仅是巧妙的词语操控。这在信息通过社交媒体平台迅速传播的时代尤其令人担忧。人们可能在不知情的情况下成为sophister论证的受害者，导致误导性的信念和决策。为了抵制sophisters的影响，批判性思维技能至关重要。教育自己关于逻辑谬误和健全推理原则可以使我们有能力识别何时有人使用sophister策略。例如，识别人身攻击——即攻击对手的品格而不是处理论点——可以帮助我们专注于问题本身，而不是被个人侮辱所分散注意力。此外，促进开放的对话和鼓励多元化的观点可以减轻sophister推理的影响。当人们以理解的意图参与讨论，而不是以赢得争论的意图时，sophister策略的潜力就会减小。创建一个让个人感到安全表达思想而不必担心被操控或嘲笑的环境至关重要。总之，虽然说服艺术是一项宝贵的技能，但意识到sophisters所使用的方法至关重要。识别和挑战他们的论点可以导致更明智和诚实的讨论。在日常生活中，我们在沟通的复杂性中航行时，让我们努力维护诚信和清晰，确保我们的互动根植于真相而非欺骗。通过这样做，我们可以培养一个真实理解胜过sophisters狡诈策略的社会。