doctrinarian

简明释义

英[/ˌdɒk.trɪˈnɛr.i.ən/]美[/ˌdɒk.trɪˈnɛr.i.ən/]

教条主义者

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In all that is said by the doctrinarian objection above presented, there is no question of anything but effect, we seek the cause.

在上面提到的那种教条主义的反对言论里，谈到的只是效果，而我们要找的是起因。

2.In all that is said by the doctrinarian objection above presented, there is no question of anything but effect, we seek the cause.

在上面提到的那种教条主义的反对言论里，谈到的只是效果，而我们要找的是起因。

3.The debate was stifled by a doctrinarian adherence to outdated theories.

辩论被对过时理论的教条主义坚持所压制。

4.In a world that values innovation, being doctrinarian can be a significant disadvantage.

在一个重视创新的世界里，持有教条主义的态度可能会是一个重大劣势。

5.The teacher's approach was too doctrinarian, leaving little room for creative thinking in the classroom.

老师的教学方法过于教条主义，几乎没有给课堂上的创造性思维留下空间。

6.His doctrinarian views on politics made it difficult for him to accept differing opinions.

他在政治上的教条主义观点使他很难接受不同的意见。

7.The committee's doctrinarian stance hindered progress on the project.

委员会的教条主义立场阻碍了项目的进展。

作文

In the realm of politics and philosophy, the term doctrinarian refers to an individual who is rigidly committed to a specific doctrine or set of beliefs, often to the detriment of practical considerations. This unwavering adherence can lead to a narrow-minded approach, where the complexities of real-world situations are ignored in favor of strict ideological conformity. The doctrinarian mindset can be particularly problematic in leadership roles, where flexibility and adaptability are crucial for effective governance.For instance, consider a political leader who identifies as a staunch advocate of free-market capitalism. If this leader is a doctrinarian, they may refuse to acknowledge any potential benefits of government intervention in the economy, even in times of crisis. Such inflexibility can result in policies that exacerbate economic downturns or fail to address the needs of vulnerable populations. Instead of evaluating each situation on its own merits, the doctrinarian clings to their beliefs, often leading to misguided decisions.Moreover, the influence of doctrinarian thinking extends beyond politics into various fields, including education and science. In educational settings, a doctrinarian teacher may insist on teaching a particular theory without allowing for alternative perspectives or critical thinking. This can stifle students' creativity and discourage them from exploring diverse viewpoints. Similarly, in scientific research, a doctrinarian scientist may become so attached to a specific hypothesis that they disregard evidence that contradicts their beliefs, thereby hindering scientific progress.The dangers of doctrinarian thinking are evident in history as well. Many societies have suffered under regimes led by doctrinarian leaders who imposed their ideologies without regard for the consequences. These leaders often prioritize their beliefs over the welfare of their citizens, leading to oppression and suffering. The rigidity of doctrinarian thought can create an environment where dissent is not tolerated, resulting in a culture of fear and conformity.However, it is essential to recognize that not all commitment to a belief system is inherently negative. A healthy level of conviction can inspire individuals to advocate for change and stand up against injustice. The key distinction lies in the ability to engage in critical thinking and remain open to new information. A doctrinarian lacks this flexibility, while a principled individual can adapt their views based on evidence and reasoning.In conclusion, the term doctrinarian encapsulates a mindset characterized by rigid adherence to a specific doctrine, often at the expense of practical considerations and critical analysis. Whether in politics, education, or science, the implications of doctrinarian thinking can be detrimental, leading to poor decision-making and a lack of innovation. It is crucial for individuals, especially those in positions of power, to cultivate an open-minded approach that values evidence and diverse perspectives. By doing so, we can move towards a more nuanced understanding of complex issues and foster a society that encourages growth and progress.

在政治和哲学领域，术语doctrinarian指的是一个人对特定教义或信念体系的坚定承诺，往往以牺牲实际考虑为代价。这种不动摇的坚持可能导致一种狭隘的思维方式，在这种思维方式中，现实世界情况的复杂性被忽视，而偏向于严格的意识形态一致性。doctrinarian心态在领导角色中尤其成问题，因为灵活性和适应能力对于有效治理至关重要。例如，考虑一个自称为自由市场资本主义坚定倡导者的政治领导人。如果这个领导人是一个doctrinarian，他们可能会拒绝承认政府在经济中干预的任何潜在好处，即使在危机时期也是如此。这种不灵活性可能导致加剧经济衰退的政策，或未能满足脆弱群体的需求。doctrinarian不愿意根据每个情况的自身优缺点进行评估，常常导致误导性的决策。此外，doctrinarian思维的影响超越了政治，延伸到各个领域，包括教育和科学。在教育环境中，一个doctrinarian教师可能坚持教授特定理论，而不允许替代观点或批判性思维。这可能会扼杀学生的创造力，并阻止他们探索多样化的观点。同样，在科学研究中，一个doctrinarian科学家可能对特定假设过于执着，以至于忽视与其信念相矛盾的证据，从而阻碍科学进步。doctrinarian思维的危险在历史上也是显而易见的。许多社会在由doctrinarian领导者主导的政权下遭受苦难，这些领导者在没有考虑后果的情况下强加自己的意识形态。这些领导者往往将自己的信念置于公民的福祉之上，导致压迫和痛苦。doctrinarian思想的僵化可能会创造出一种不容忍异议的环境，导致恐惧和一致性的文化。然而，必须认识到，并非所有对信仰体系的承诺都是固有的负面。适度的信念可以激励个人倡导变革并反对不公。关键的区别在于是否能够进行批判性思维并保持开放的态度。doctrinarian缺乏这种灵活性，而一个有原则的人则可以根据证据和推理调整自己的观点。总之，术语doctrinarian概括了一种特征，即对特定教义的僵硬遵循，往往以牺牲实际考虑和批判性分析为代价。无论是在政治、教育还是科学领域，doctrinarian思维的影响可能是有害的，导致糟糕的决策和缺乏创新。对于个人，尤其是那些处于权力地位的人来说，培养一种重视证据和多样化观点的开放心态至关重要。通过这样做，我们可以朝着更细致的复杂问题理解迈进，并促进一个鼓励成长和进步的社会。