falsidical

简明释义

[/fɔːlˈsɪdɪkəl/][/fɔːlˈsɪdɪkəl/]

adj. 说谎的;虚伪的

英英释义

Characterized by falsehood or deception; misleading.

以虚假或欺骗为特征;具有误导性。

单词用法

同义词

deceptive

欺骗性的

The advertisement was found to be deceptive, leading many consumers to make uninformed decisions.

这则广告被发现是欺骗性的,导致许多消费者做出了不明智的决定。

fallacious

谬误的

His fallacious arguments failed to convince the jury of his innocence.

他谬误的论点未能说服陪审团相信他的清白。

misleading

误导性的

The article contained misleading information that could skew public perception.

这篇文章包含了可能扭曲公众认知的误导性信息。

false

错误的

The claim was proven to be false after further investigation.

经过进一步调查,该声明被证明是错误的。

反义词

truthful

真实的

She is known for her truthful statements.

她以真实的陈述而闻名。

veritable

确实的

The veritable facts of the case were presented in court.

案件的确实事实在法庭上被提出。

genuine

真正的

He gave a genuine apology for his actions.

他为自己的行为真诚道歉。

例句

1.It is fantastical, falsidical and deceitful.

它是虚幻的,虚假的,欺骗的。

2.It is very difficulty to realize against justice, is fantastical, falsidical, deceitful, false, times work and half succcess.

违背公正原则的都很难实现,是假想,是谎言,是欺骗,是谬误,而且事倍功半。

3.It is very difficulty to realize against justice, is fantastical, falsidical, deceitful, false, times work and half succcess.

违背公正原则的都很难实现,是假想,是谎言,是欺骗,是谬误,而且事倍功半。

4.In his essay, he argued against falsidical 虚假的 claims made by popular media.

在他的论文中,他反对流行媒体所做的falsidical 虚假的声明。

5.The lawyer pointed out that the evidence presented was falsidical 虚假的 and should not be considered in court.

律师指出,提交的证据是falsidical 虚假的,不应在法庭上考虑。

6.The detective realized that the witness's statement was falsidical 虚假的, leading them to the wrong suspect.

侦探意识到证人的陈述是falsidical 虚假的,使他们误认为嫌疑人错误。

7.His falsidical 虚假的 arguments failed to convince the jury of his innocence.

falsidical 虚假的论点未能说服陪审团相信他的清白。

8.The philosopher discussed how falsidical 虚假的 reasoning can lead to false conclusions.

哲学家讨论了如何falsidical 虚假的推理可能导致错误结论。

作文

In the realm of philosophy and logic, the concept of truth is paramount. However, there are instances where the perception of truth can be misleading or distorted. This brings us to the term falsidical, which refers to something that is false or deceptive in nature. Understanding this term is essential for anyone who seeks to engage with complex arguments or philosophical discussions. Falsidical reasoning can lead individuals to draw incorrect conclusions based on faulty premises, ultimately undermining the integrity of their arguments.Consider a situation in which a politician makes a claim about the economy. If they present data that has been manipulated or taken out of context, their argument becomes falsidical. The deceptive nature of their claim can sway public opinion, even though the underlying facts are not accurate. This highlights the importance of critical thinking and skepticism when evaluating information presented to us.Moreover, falsidical statements can often spread misinformation, especially in the age of social media. A viral post may contain a falsidical assertion that captures attention but lacks factual basis. When individuals share such posts without verifying the information, they contribute to the propagation of falsehoods. This phenomenon emphasizes the need for media literacy in our society, as it empowers people to discern between truth and deception.In literature, authors sometimes employ falsidical narratives to challenge readers' perceptions. By crafting stories that twist reality, writers can provoke thought and encourage deeper analysis of the themes presented. For example, George Orwell's '1984' explores a world where truth is manipulated by those in power. The falsidical nature of the government's propaganda serves as a cautionary tale about the fragility of truth in the face of authoritarianism.Philosophically, the study of falsidical arguments raises questions about the nature of belief and knowledge. If one can be led to believe something that is fundamentally false, what does that say about our ability to know the truth? This inquiry leads to discussions about epistemology and the criteria we use to determine what we accept as true. A falsidical premise may seem plausible at first glance, yet a thorough examination can reveal its flaws.In conclusion, the term falsidical encapsulates the idea of deception and falsehood. Its relevance extends beyond academic discourse into everyday life, where the ability to recognize falsidical claims is crucial for informed decision-making. Whether in politics, media, literature, or philosophy, understanding the implications of falsidical reasoning allows us to navigate a world rife with misinformation. As we strive for clarity and truth, let us remain vigilant against the allure of the falsidical and seek to uphold the principles of honesty and integrity in our pursuits.

在哲学和逻辑的领域中,真理的概念是至关重要的。然而,有些情况下,真理的感知可能会产生误导或扭曲。这就引出了术语falsidical,它指的是本质上是虚假或具有欺骗性的事物。理解这个术语对于任何希望参与复杂论证或哲学讨论的人来说都是必要的。Falsidical推理可能导致个人根据错误的前提得出不正确的结论,最终破坏他们论点的完整性。考虑这样一种情况:一位政治家对经济做出声明。如果他们呈现的数据经过操纵或断章取义,他们的论点就变得falsidical。他们主张的欺骗性本质可能会影响公众舆论,即使其基础事实并不准确。这凸显了在评估我们所接收的信息时,批判性思维和怀疑态度的重要性。此外,falsidical陈述往往会传播错误信息,尤其是在社交媒体时代。一条病毒式传播的帖子可能包含一个falsidical的断言,虽然吸引注意力,但缺乏事实依据。当个人在未验证信息的情况下分享此类帖子时,他们助长了虚假信息的传播。这一现象强调了在我们的社会中提升媒体素养的必要性,因为这使人们能够辨别真相与欺骗之间的区别。在文学中,作者有时会使用falsidical叙述来挑战读者的感知。通过编写扭曲现实的故事,作家可以激发思考,并鼓励对所呈现主题的更深入分析。例如,乔治·奥威尔的《1984》探讨了一个真理被权力操控的世界。政府宣传的falsidical性质作为对真理脆弱性的警示,提醒我们在面对专制主义时应保持警惕。在哲学上,对falsidical论证的研究提出了关于信仰和知识本质的问题。如果一个人可以被引导相信某些根本虚假的东西,这对我们了解真理的能力意味着什么?这一探讨引发了关于认识论的讨论,以及我们用来判断什么是我们接受为真的标准。一个falsidical的前提在初看似乎合理,但经过彻底审查后可能会揭示其缺陷。总之,术语falsidical概括了欺骗和虚假的概念。它的相关性超越了学术话语,延伸到日常生活中,在那里识别falsidical主张的能力对明智的决策至关重要。无论是在政治、媒体、文学还是哲学中,理解falsidical推理的含义使我们能够在充满错误信息的世界中航行。当我们追求清晰和真理时,让我们保持警惕,抵御falsidical的诱惑,并努力在我们的追求中维护诚实和完整的原则。