doubtable

简明释义

英[/ˈdaʊtəbl/]美[/ˈdaʊtəbl/]

adj. 令人怀疑的；可疑的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.This proposal whether to be accepted doubtable generally by the people.

这项提议能否被人们普遍地接受令人怀疑。

2.During this trial, there are many doubtable pieces of evidence which must be re-verified.

这次审判中，有许多证据有质证，需要重新核实。

3.During this trial, there are many doubtable pieces of evidence which must be re-verified.

这次审判中，有许多证据有质证，需要重新核实。

4.In reality, however, the authenticity of accounting information is often doubtable.

然而在现实中，会计信息的真实性却时常令人质疑。

5.The authenticity of the painting is doubtable without proper documentation.

没有适当的文件，这幅画的真实性是可疑的。

6.The results of the experiment were doubtable, leading to further investigation.

实验结果是可疑的，导致需要进一步调查。

7.His claims about the product's effectiveness are highly doubtable.

他关于产品有效性的说法是高度可疑的。

8.The reliability of the source was doubtable, prompting us to seek other references.

该来源的可靠性是可疑的，促使我们寻求其他参考资料。

9.In light of recent events, her motives seem doubtable.

考虑到最近的事件，她的动机似乎是可疑的。

作文

In today's world, where information is abundant and easily accessible, the ability to discern truth from falsehood has become increasingly important. With the rise of social media and the internet, we are constantly bombarded with news, opinions, and claims that often lack credible sources. As a result, many of these assertions are doubtable (可怀疑的) and can lead to misinformation. It is essential for individuals to develop critical thinking skills to evaluate the reliability of the information they encounter. One of the primary reasons why certain information is doubtable (可怀疑的) is the presence of bias. Many articles or reports may be written with a specific agenda in mind, aiming to persuade readers rather than inform them. For instance, political news is often colored by the biases of the journalists or the outlets producing it. When consuming such content, it is crucial to consider the source and its potential motivations. Are they presenting facts or merely opinion? This question helps to determine whether the information is trustworthy or doubtable (可怀疑的). Furthermore, the speed at which news travels today contributes to the spread of doubtable (可怀疑的) information. In an effort to be the first to report breaking news, many outlets may publish stories without fully verifying their accuracy. This rush can lead to the dissemination of false information, which can have real-world consequences. For example, during crises such as natural disasters or public health emergencies, inaccurate reporting can cause panic or lead to harmful behaviors among the public. Therefore, it is vital for consumers of news to approach such reports with skepticism and to seek confirmation from multiple, reliable sources before accepting them as truth. Moreover, the phenomenon of 'fake news' has further complicated our understanding of what is factual. Some individuals and organizations intentionally create misleading headlines or entirely false stories to attract clicks and generate revenue. These sensationalized pieces are often designed to provoke strong emotional reactions, making them more shareable on social media. Unfortunately, many people do not take the time to verify these claims, leading to the widespread acceptance of doubtable (可怀疑的) narratives. To combat the prevalence of doubtable (可怀疑的) information, education plays a pivotal role. Schools should prioritize teaching students how to critically analyze sources and differentiate between credible journalism and biased or fabricated content. By instilling these skills early on, we can cultivate a generation of informed citizens who are less susceptible to manipulation by doubtable (可怀疑的) information. In conclusion, as we navigate through a sea of information, it is imperative to remain vigilant and discerning. The ability to question the validity of what we read and hear is essential in an age where doubtable (可怀疑的) information is rampant. By developing critical thinking skills and promoting media literacy, we can better equip ourselves to identify and reject misinformation, ultimately fostering a more informed society.

在当今这个信息丰富且易于获取的世界里，辨别真相与谎言的能力变得愈发重要。随着社交媒体和互联网的兴起，我们不断被新闻、观点和缺乏可信来源的主张轰炸。因此，许多这些主张都是doubtable（可怀疑的），可能导致错误信息的传播。个人必须培养批判性思维技能，以评估他们所遇到的信息的可靠性。某些信息之所以doubtable（可怀疑的）的主要原因之一是存在偏见。许多文章或报道可能是出于特定议程而撰写，目的是说服读者而非告知他们。例如，政治新闻常常受到记者或制作该内容的媒体的偏见影响。在消费此类内容时，考虑来源及其潜在动机至关重要。他们是在陈述事实还是仅仅表达观点？这个问题有助于判断信息是否可信或doubtable（可怀疑的）。此外，今天新闻传播的速度也加剧了doubtable（可怀疑的）信息的传播。为了第一时间报道突发新闻，许多媒体可能在完全验证准确性之前就发布故事。这种匆忙可能导致虚假信息的传播，而这些虚假信息可能会产生现实世界的后果。例如，在自然灾害或公共卫生紧急情况等危机期间，不准确的报道可能导致公众恐慌或引发有害行为。因此，新闻消费者在面对此类报道时，必须保持怀疑态度，并在接受它们为真之前，从多个可靠来源寻求确认。此外，“假新闻”现象进一步复杂化了我们对事实的理解。一些个人和组织故意创建误导性的标题或完全虚假的故事，以吸引点击并产生收入。这些耸人听闻的文章通常旨在引发强烈的情感反应，使其在社交媒体上更具分享性。不幸的是，许多人没有花时间验证这些主张，导致对doubtable（可怀疑的）叙事的广泛接受。为了对抗doubtable（可怀疑的）信息的普遍存在，教育发挥着关键作用。学校应该优先教授学生如何批判性地分析来源，区分可信的新闻报道和偏见或伪造的内容。通过早期灌输这些技能，我们可以培养出一代不易受到doubtable（可怀疑的）信息操控的知情公民。总之，在我们穿越信息海洋的过程中，保持警惕和洞察力至关重要。在一个doubtable（可怀疑的）信息泛滥的时代，质疑我们所阅读和听到的内容的有效性是必不可少的。通过发展批判性思维技能和促进媒体素养，我们可以更好地装备自己，以识别和拒绝错误信息，最终促进一个更加知情的社会。