decontrol

简明释义

英[ˌdiːkənˈtrəʊl]美[ˌdiːkənˈtroʊl]

v. 解除对……的控制

n. 解除管制

复 数 d e c o n t r o l s

第 三 人 称 单 数 d e c o n t r o l s

现 在 分 词 d e c o n t r o l l i n g

过 去 式 d e c o n t r o l l e d

过 去 分 词 d e c o n t r o l l e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.He established a national energy policy that included conservation, price decontrol, and new technology.

他成立了一个包括保护，价格放开，和新技术的国家能源政策。

2.And, of course, there was the decontrol of oil markets.

当然解除对市场的管制必不可少。

3.The Russian government chose not to decontrol oil and gas prices last January.

俄国政府去年一月份已经选择了不解除对油价和天然气价格的控制。

4.He established a national energy policy that included conservation, price decontrol, and new technology.

他成立了一个包括保护，价格放开，和新技术的国家能源政策。

5.Let me explain three key ways the decontrol process can improve your life.

让我来解释三个可以解除控制的方法来改进我们的生活。

6.After years of regulation, the market was ready to decontrol its energy sector.

经过多年的监管，市场准备好放松对能源部门的控制。

7.The decision to decontrol interest rates was met with mixed reactions from economists.

决定放松对利率的控制引起了经济学家的不同反应。

8.The government decided to decontrol the prices of essential goods to promote competition.

政府决定放松对基本商品价格的控制，以促进竞争。

9.The company aims to decontrol its production processes to increase efficiency.

该公司旨在放松对生产流程的控制以提高效率。

10.In an effort to stimulate growth, the city council voted to decontrol housing development regulations.

为了刺激增长，市议会投票决定放松对住房开发的规定。

作文

In recent years, the concept of decontrol has gained significant attention in various fields, particularly in economics and governance. The term decontrol refers to the process of removing restrictions or regulations that have previously been imposed on a particular sector or industry. This can lead to increased competition, innovation, and efficiency. However, it also raises concerns about potential negative consequences, such as market monopolization and reduced consumer protection.One of the most prominent examples of decontrol can be seen in the energy sector. Many countries have moved towards decontrol of their energy markets, allowing private companies to operate without stringent government oversight. Proponents argue that this shift encourages competition, which can result in lower prices for consumers and more choices in energy sources. For instance, in the United States, the deregulation of the electricity market in the 1990s aimed to foster competition among energy providers, leading to innovations in renewable energy technologies.However, the decontrol of the energy market has not been without its challenges. Critics point to instances where decontrol has led to price volatility and inadequate service provision. The California energy crisis of 2000-2001 serves as a cautionary tale, where the rapid decontrol of the electricity market resulted in blackouts and skyrocketing prices. This incident underscores the importance of finding a balance between fostering competition and ensuring adequate regulatory oversight to protect consumers.Another area where decontrol has been debated is in the realm of telecommunications. Many countries have opted to decontrol their telecom sectors by privatizing state-owned enterprises and allowing new entrants into the market. This has often led to improved services and lower prices for consumers. In India, for example, the decontrol of the telecom industry in the early 2000s resulted in a dramatic increase in mobile phone usage and internet access. It transformed the country into one of the fastest-growing telecom markets in the world.Nevertheless, the decontrol of telecommunications has also raised concerns about data privacy and security. As new players enter the market, there are fears that consumer data may not be adequately protected, leading to potential abuse. Regulatory bodies must therefore strike a delicate balance between encouraging competition through decontrol and ensuring that consumers' rights are safeguarded.In conclusion, while decontrol can lead to numerous benefits, such as increased competition and innovation, it is essential to approach it with caution. The challenges faced in various sectors highlight the need for a thoughtful and measured approach to decontrol. Policymakers must ensure that regulations are adjusted appropriately to foster a competitive environment while protecting consumers from potential pitfalls. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a system that encourages growth and innovation without compromising the well-being of society as a whole. Therefore, understanding the implications of decontrol is crucial for anyone involved in policy-making or business strategy today.

近年来，‘decontrol’这一概念在各个领域，尤其是在经济和治理方面，引起了广泛关注。‘decontrol’一词指的是解除对特定行业或领域之前施加的限制或监管的过程。这可能导致竞争、创新和效率的增加。然而，这也引发了对潜在负面后果的担忧，例如市场垄断和消费者保护的减少。‘decontrol’的一个显著例子可以在能源部门看到。许多国家已开始朝着能源市场的‘decontrol’方向发展，允许私营企业在没有严格政府监管的情况下运营。支持者认为，这种转变鼓励了竞争，从而可能导致消费者价格的降低和能源来源的更多选择。例如，在美国，1990年代电力市场的放松管制旨在促进能源供应商之间的竞争，从而推动可再生能源技术的创新。然而，能源市场的‘decontrol’并非没有挑战。批评者指出，‘decontrol’曾导致价格波动和服务不足。2000-2001年加州能源危机就是一个警示案例，迅速的‘decontrol’电力市场导致了停电和价格飙升。这一事件强调了在促进竞争与确保适当的监管监督以保护消费者之间找到平衡的重要性。另一个关于‘decontrol’被讨论的领域是电信领域。许多国家选择通过私有化国有企业和允许新进入者进入市场来‘decontrol’其电信部门。这通常导致了服务的改善和消费者价格的降低。在印度，例如，2000年代初电信行业的‘decontrol’导致移动电话使用率和互联网接入的急剧增加。它使该国转变为世界上增长最快的电信市场之一。然而，电信的‘decontrol’也引发了对数据隐私和安全的担忧。随着新参与者进入市场，人们担心消费者数据可能得不到充分保护，从而导致潜在的滥用。因此，监管机构必须在通过‘decontrol’促进竞争与确保消费者权利得到保障之间取得微妙的平衡。总之，虽然‘decontrol’可以带来许多好处，例如竞争和创新的增加，但必须谨慎对待。各个领域面临的挑战突显了对‘decontrol’采取深思熟虑和适度的方法的必要性。政策制定者必须确保适当地调整法规，以促进竞争环境，同时保护消费者免受潜在的陷阱。因此，理解‘decontrol’的影响对于今天任何参与政策制定或商业战略的人来说都是至关重要的。