embargoes
简明释义
禁运
英英释义
单词用法
武器禁运，军火禁运 | |
对…的禁运 |
同义词
反义词
例句
1.Past experience shows that quarantine measures and embargoes on the movement of people and goods are unnecessary.
以往的经验表明，不必要采取检疫措施并对人员和货物流动加以禁止。
2.There is an integrated world oil market, and embargoes do not work.
世界原油市场是整合一体的，因此石油禁令并不起作用。
3.The company has consistently denied it had knowingly broken arms embargoes.
该公司始终否认故意违反了武器禁运规定。
4.Call them embargoes, call it suffering, call it pressure.
叫他们禁运，称之为痛苦，把它的压力。
5.We need higher quality in our high-tech industry to combat monopolies and embargoes.
我们需要在高科技产业中突出高品质，这样我们才能抵御形形色色的垄断和禁运。
6.Past experience shows that quarantine measures and embargoes on the movement of people and goods are unnecessary.
以往的经验表明，不必要采取检疫措施并对人员和货物流动加以禁止。
7.The United Nations often debates whether to impose embargoes as a form of punishment.
联合国经常讨论是否施加禁运作为惩罚的一种形式。
8.The embargoes on oil exports significantly affected the global market.
对石油出口的禁运显著影响了全球市场。
9.The government imposed strict embargoes on trade with the neighboring country.
政府对与邻国的贸易施加了严格的禁运。
10.Some businesses are struggling due to the embargoes placed on their products.
由于对其产品施加的禁运，一些企业正面临困境。
11.Many countries have lifted embargoes on humanitarian aid to help those in need.
许多国家已解除对人道主义援助的禁运以帮助有需要的人。
作文
In the realm of international relations, the term embargoes refers to official bans or restrictions imposed by countries on the trade of specific goods with other nations. These measures are often implemented for political reasons, aiming to exert pressure on a government or to signal disapproval of certain actions. The history of embargoes is long and complex, reflecting the intricate web of global politics and economics. For instance, one of the most notable examples is the United States' embargo against Cuba, which has been in place since the early 1960s. This embargo was enacted in response to the Cuban Revolution and the subsequent alignment of Cuba with the Soviet Union during the Cold War. The aim was to isolate Cuba economically and politically, hoping to bring about change in its governance.The effectiveness of embargoes can be a subject of debate. Proponents argue that they can lead to significant economic hardship for the targeted nation, thereby forcing it to reconsider its policies. However, critics contend that embargoes often hurt ordinary citizens more than the government, leading to humanitarian crises without achieving the intended political outcomes. For example, the sanctions imposed on Iraq in the 1990s are frequently cited as having devastating effects on the civilian population while failing to remove Saddam Hussein from power.Moreover, embargoes can also have unintended consequences that affect global markets. When a country is cut off from trade, it can lead to shortages of goods not only in the targeted nation but also in others that rely on those goods. This can create ripple effects that disrupt supply chains and drive up prices worldwide. In recent years, the embargoes placed on Iran due to its nuclear program have impacted oil prices globally, demonstrating how interconnected the world economy has become.In addition to their economic implications, embargoes also raise ethical questions. Many argue that punishing an entire population for the actions of their government is unjust. Humanitarian exemptions are sometimes included in embargoes, allowing for the provision of essential goods such as food and medicine. However, the enforcement of these exemptions can be complicated, and often, aid does not reach those who need it most.As we navigate an increasingly polarized world, the use of embargoes continues to evolve. New technologies and communication methods allow for more nuanced approaches, such as targeted sanctions that focus on specific individuals or entities rather than entire nations. This shift aims to minimize collateral damage to civilians while still applying pressure on those in power.In conclusion, embargoes are a powerful tool in international diplomacy, wielded to influence the behavior of nations. Their impact can be profound, affecting economies, politics, and the lives of ordinary people. Understanding the complexities surrounding embargoes is crucial for anyone interested in global affairs, as they represent both the challenges and the responsibilities that come with wielding such power on the world stage.
在国际关系领域，术语embargoes指的是国家对与其他国家贸易特定商品的官方禁令或限制。这些措施通常出于政治原因实施，旨在对一个政府施加压力或表达对某些行为的不满。embargoes的历史悠久而复杂，反映了全球政治和经济的错综复杂。例如，美国对古巴实施的embargo就是一个显著的例子，该禁令自20世纪60年代初以来一直存在。此embargo是针对古巴革命及其在冷战期间与苏联结盟的回应。其目的是在经济和政治上孤立古巴，希望促使其治理发生变化。embargoes的有效性常常是一个争论的话题。支持者认为，它们可以给目标国家带来重大的经济困难，从而迫使其重新考虑政策。然而，批评者则认为，embargoes往往对普通公民造成伤害，而非政府，导致人道主义危机而未能实现预期的政治结果。例如，1990年代对伊拉克实施的制裁常被引用为对平民造成毁灭性影响的案例，但未能将萨达姆·侯赛因赶下台。此外，embargoes还可能产生意想不到的后果，影响全球市场。当一个国家被切断贸易时，不仅目标国会出现商品短缺，依赖这些商品的其他国家也可能受到影响。这可能会造成涟漪效应，扰乱供应链并推动全球价格上涨。近年来，由于核问题对伊朗实施的embargoes已对全球油价产生了影响，显示出全球经济的相互联系程度。除了经济影响外，embargoes还引发了伦理问题。许多人认为，因政府的行为惩罚整个民族是不公正的。有时在embargoes中包括人道主义豁免，允许提供基本商品如食品和药品。然而，这些豁免的执行可能复杂，且援助往往无法到达最需要的人。随着我们在日益两极化的世界中前行，embargoes的使用仍在不断演变。新技术和沟通方式使得更细致的方法成为可能，例如针对特定个人或实体的制裁，而不是整个国家。这种转变旨在尽量减少对平民的附带损害，同时仍对掌权者施加压力。总之，embargoes是国际外交中的一种强大工具，用于影响国家的行为。它们的影响可能深远，影响经济、政治和普通人的生活。理解围绕embargoes的复杂性对于任何对全球事务感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的，因为它们代表了施加如此权力于世界舞台所带来的挑战和责任。
