imperatorial

简明释义

英[ɪmˌperəˈtɔːrɪəl]美[ɪmpərəˈtɔːrɪəl]

adj. 皇帝的；至尊的；大将军的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In addition, the club sets up 49 luxury and conformable private rooms - Imperatorial room, Earl room, Noble room, VIP room (small, medium and large), and Mini room.

俱乐部为尊贵会员增设49间豪华舒适的包房——至尊房、伯爵房、贵族房、VIP贵宾房(大中小)、迷你房。

2.In addition, the club sets up 49 luxury and conformable private rooms - Imperatorial room, Earl room, Noble room, VIP room (small, medium and large), and Mini room.

俱乐部为尊贵会员增设49间豪华舒适的包房——至尊房、伯爵房、贵族房、VIP贵宾房(大中小)、迷你房。

3.His imperatorial 专制的 approach to management alienated many employees.

他imperatorial 专制的管理方式使许多员工感到疏远。

4.The general's imperatorial 军事的 decisions were often met with both admiration and fear.

将军的imperatorial 军事的决定常常引起钦佩和恐惧。

5.The leader's imperatorial 统治的 style left a lasting impact on the organization.

这位领导者的imperatorial 统治的风格对组织产生了深远的影响。

6.Her imperatorial 皇帝般的 demeanor commanded respect from her peers.

她的imperatorial 皇帝般的举止赢得了同龄人的尊重。

7.In ancient Rome, an imperatorial 帝王的 decree could change the course of history.

在古罗马，一项imperatorial 帝王的法令可以改变历史的进程。

作文

In the realm of leadership and governance, the term imperatorial often evokes images of absolute power and authority. An imperatorial figure is one who possesses the ability to command and influence with a strong hand, reminiscent of ancient emperors who ruled vast empires with unwavering control. The essence of being imperatorial is not merely about holding power; it encompasses the responsibility that comes with such authority. Leaders who embody imperatorial qualities must navigate the complex dynamics of their positions, balancing the expectations of their followers with the demands of their roles.Throughout history, we have witnessed numerous leaders who exhibited imperatorial traits. For instance, figures like Julius Caesar and Genghis Khan are often cited as archetypes of imperatorial leadership. Their ability to inspire loyalty, enforce discipline, and expand their territories illustrates the profound impact of imperatorial authority. However, this type of leadership is a double-edged sword; while it can lead to remarkable achievements and stability, it can also foster tyranny and oppression if wielded irresponsibly.In modern contexts, the concept of imperatorial leadership can still be observed in various sectors, including politics, business, and even social movements. A CEO who makes unilateral decisions without consulting their team may be seen as exhibiting imperatorial tendencies. While such decisiveness can lead to swift action and clear direction, it can also alienate team members and stifle creativity. Therefore, the challenge for contemporary leaders is to harness the strengths of imperatorial leadership while mitigating its potential pitfalls.Moreover, the rise of collaborative leadership styles has prompted a reevaluation of what it means to be imperatorial. In an era where teamwork and inclusivity are highly valued, leaders are increasingly expected to engage with their teams rather than dictate from above. This shift does not negate the need for strong leadership; instead, it redefines it. An imperatorial leader today might be one who leads with vision and decisiveness but also listens to the voices of others, creating an environment where everyone feels empowered to contribute.The implications of imperatorial leadership extend beyond individual organizations. On a societal level, the traits associated with imperatorial figures can influence political landscapes and cultural norms. In democracies, for instance, the tension between imperatorial ambition and the principles of shared governance can shape public discourse and policy-making. Leaders who embrace imperatorial qualities must remain vigilant against the allure of authoritarianism, ensuring that they uphold democratic values and respect the rights of all citizens.In conclusion, understanding the concept of imperatorial leadership allows us to appreciate the complexities of power dynamics in various contexts. While the allure of imperatorial authority can be strong, it is crucial for leaders to remember that true strength lies in their ability to inspire and unite rather than dominate. As we reflect on the qualities of imperatorial figures throughout history and in our contemporary world, we must strive to cultivate leadership that is not only effective but also ethical and inclusive.

在领导和治理的领域，术语imperatorial常常唤起绝对权力和权威的形象。一个imperatorial的人物是指那些能够以强有力的方式指挥和影响他人的人，这让人联想到古代皇帝以坚定的控制统治着广阔的帝国。成为imperatorial的本质不仅仅在于拥有权力；它还包括伴随这种权威而来的责任。具备imperatorial特质的领导者必须驾驭其职位的复杂动态，平衡追随者的期望与角色的要求。历史上，我们见证了许多展现出imperatorial特征的领导者。例如，尤利乌斯·凯撒和成吉思汗等人物常被视为imperatorial领导的典型。他们激发忠诚、执行纪律和扩展领土的能力展示了imperatorial权威的深远影响。然而，这种类型的领导是一把双刃剑；虽然它可以带来显著的成就和稳定，但如果使用不当，也可能滋生暴政和压迫。在现代背景下，imperatorial领导的概念仍然可以在政治、商业甚至社会运动等各个领域观察到。一位在未咨询团队的情况下做出单方面决策的首席执行官可能被视为展现了imperatorial倾向。虽然这种果断能迅速采取行动并提供明确方向，但也可能使团队成员感到疏离并抑制创造力。因此，当代领导者的挑战在于利用imperatorial领导的优势，同时减轻其潜在的缺陷。此外，合作式领导风格的兴起促使我们重新评估成为imperatorial的意义。在一个高度重视团队合作和包容性的时代，领导者越来越被期望与团队互动，而不是从高处发号施令。这一转变并不否定强有力领导的必要性；相反，它重新定义了这一概念。今天的imperatorial领导者可能是一个具有愿景和果敢的人，同时也倾听他人的声音，创造一个每个人都感到被赋权参与的环境。imperatorial领导的影响超越了个体组织。在社会层面，与imperatorial人物相关的特质可以影响政治格局和文化规范。例如，在民主国家，imperatorial野心与共享治理原则之间的紧张关系可以塑造公共话语和政策制定。拥抱imperatorial特质的领导者必须保持警惕，抵御专制主义的诱惑，确保他们维护民主价值观并尊重所有公民的权利。总之，理解imperatorial领导的概念使我们能够欣赏各种背景中权力动态的复杂性。虽然imperatorial权威的诱惑可能很强，但领导者必须记住，真正的力量在于他们激励和团结而非支配的能力。当我们反思历史上和当今世界中的imperatorial人物的特质时，我们必须努力培养不仅有效而且道德和包容的领导力。