caudillo

简明释义

英[kɔːˈdiːljəʊ]美[kaʊˈðiːljɔ]

n. 元首，领袖

复 数 c a u d i l l o s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Salamanca: the university town that Franco made his base early in the Spanish civil war has an image of the caudillo chiselled above the archways of its central Plaza mayor.

萨拉曼卡：这座如今的大学城在西班牙内战的早期被弗朗哥作为自己的基地。萨拉曼卡市中心的马约尔广场的拱门上雕刻着弗朗哥像。

2.Salamanca: the university town that Franco made his base early in the Spanish civil war has an image of the caudillo chiselled above the archways of its central Plaza mayor.

萨拉曼卡：这座如今的大学城在西班牙内战的早期被弗朗哥作为自己的基地。萨拉曼卡市中心的马约尔广场的拱门上雕刻着弗朗哥像。

3.During the Spanish Civil War, many regions were controlled by a caudillo who enforced strict rules.

在西班牙内战期间，许多地区由一位caudillo控制，他实施了严格的规则。

4.The military leader was often referred to as a caudillo due to his authoritarian style.

这位军事领袖由于其专制风格常被称为caudillo。

5.The term caudillo is often associated with charismatic leaders in Latin America.

术语caudillo通常与拉丁美洲的魅力领袖相关联。

6.In some countries, a caudillo may be seen as a protector of national interests.

在一些国家，caudillo可能被视为国家利益的保护者。

7.The rise of a caudillo can lead to significant political changes.

一个caudillo的崛起可能会导致重大的政治变革。

作文

The term caudillo refers to a military or political leader, often with authoritarian tendencies, particularly in Spain and Latin America. Historically, the role of a caudillo has been significant in shaping the political landscape of various countries, especially during times of turmoil or civil unrest. The emergence of caudillos can often be traced back to periods of instability where traditional governance structures fail to provide order and security. For instance, during the Spanish Civil War, figures like Francisco Franco rose to power as caudillos, leveraging their military influence to control the state and suppress opposition.In many cases, the leadership style of a caudillo is characterized by a strong central authority, often bypassing democratic processes. This concentration of power can lead to both stability and oppression, depending on the actions and policies of the caudillo. While some may argue that caudillos can bring about necessary reforms and unity, others highlight the dangers of such concentrated power, which can result in human rights abuses and the erosion of civil liberties.The legacy of caudillos in Latin America is complex. Figures like Juan Domingo Perón in Argentina and Hugo Chávez in Venezuela are often labeled as caudillos, embodying a mix of populism and authoritarianism. Their leadership styles were marked by charismatic appeals to the masses, often positioning themselves as champions of the common people against perceived elites. However, this populist approach can also lead to divisive politics and polarization within society.In contemporary discussions about leadership, the concept of the caudillo continues to resonate. The rise of populist leaders around the world has drawn parallels to historical caudillos, prompting debates about the implications for democracy and governance. In many cases, these modern leaders exhibit similar traits: a strong personal following, a disdain for traditional political norms, and a tendency to centralize power.Understanding the role of the caudillo is crucial for comprehending the historical and political dynamics of regions affected by such leadership. It raises important questions about the balance between authority and freedom, the nature of leadership, and the responsibilities that come with power. As societies grapple with the legacies of past caudillos, it becomes essential to reflect on the lessons learned and the paths forward for more inclusive and democratic governance.In conclusion, the term caudillo encapsulates a significant aspect of leadership in certain historical contexts, particularly in Spain and Latin America. It serves as a reminder of the complexities of power and authority, illustrating how leaders can emerge in times of crisis and the potential consequences of their rule. The study of caudillos not only enriches our understanding of history but also informs current discussions about political leadership and its impact on society.

“caudillo”这个词指的是军事或政治领袖，通常具有专制倾向，特别是在西班牙和拉丁美洲。历史上，“caudillo”的角色在塑造各国的政治格局方面具有重要意义，尤其是在动荡或内乱时期。“caudillo”的出现往往可以追溯到传统治理结构未能提供秩序和安全的动荡时期。例如，在西班牙内战期间，弗朗西斯科·弗朗哥等人物作为“caudillo”崛起，利用其军事影响力控制国家并压制反对派。在许多情况下，“caudillo”的领导风格特点是强大的中央权威，常常绕过民主程序。这种权力的集中可能导致稳定，也可能导致压迫，具体取决于“caudillo”的行为和政策。虽然有人可能会辩称，caudillo能够带来必要的改革和团结，但其他人则强调这种集中权力的危险，可能导致人权侵犯和公民自由的侵蚀。在拉丁美洲，“caudillo”的遗产是复杂的。胡安·多明戈·佩隆在阿根廷和乌戈·查韦斯在委内瑞拉等人物通常被贴上“caudillo”的标签，体现了民粹主义与专制主义的混合。他们的领导风格以对大众的魅力诉求为特征，常常将自己定位为普通人民反对所谓精英的斗士。然而，这种民粹主义的方法也可能导致政治分裂和社会极化。在当代关于领导力的讨论中，“caudillo”的概念仍然引起共鸣。世界各地民粹主义领导人的崛起与历史上的“caudillo”形成了对比，引发了关于民主和治理影响的辩论。在许多情况下，这些现代领导者展现出类似的特征：强大的个人追随者、对传统政治规范的不屑一顾以及集权的倾向。理解“caudillo”的角色对于理解受此类领导影响的地区的历史和政治动态至关重要。这引发了关于权威与自由之间平衡、领导本质以及权力所带来的责任的重要问题。当社会努力应对过去“caudillo”的遗产时，反思所学的教训和未来更具包容性和民主治理的道路变得至关重要。总之，“caudillo”这一术语概括了某些历史背景下领导力的重要方面，特别是在西班牙和拉丁美洲。它提醒我们权力和权威的复杂性，说明领导者如何在危机时期出现及其统治的潜在后果。对“caudillo”的研究不仅丰富了我们对历史的理解，也为当前关于政治领导及其对社会影响的讨论提供了信息。