polemicize
简明释义
vi. 参加辩论;发表辩论文
第 三 人 称 单 数 p o l e m i c i z e s
现 在 分 词 p o l e m i c i z i n g
过 去 式 p o l e m i c i z e d
过 去 分 词 p o l e m i c i z e d
英英释义
To engage in or initiate a controversial argument or dispute. | 参与或发起有争议的论证或争论。 |
单词用法
参与争论 | |
争论的语气 | |
就问题进行争论 | |
与对手进行争论 |
同义词
辩论 | 他们经常在课堂上辩论有争议的话题。 | ||
争论 | 双方对各自的信仰激烈争论。 | ||
争执 | 科学家们对实验结果提出了争议。 | ||
反驳 | 他试图用证据反驳她的说法。 | ||
讨论 | They will discuss the implications of the new policy tomorrow. | 他们明天将讨论新政策的影响。 |
反义词
调和 | They managed to reconcile their differences after a long discussion. | 经过长时间的讨论,他们设法调和了彼此的分歧。 | |
同意 | 双方最终就一个共同的解决方案达成了协议。 | ||
一致 | 委员会成员一致同意所提议的变更。 |
例句
1.Now, worship at these local altars and high places would come to be banned: Deuteronomy is going to polemicize against this.
那么,在当祭坛的崇拜,以及高地都被禁止:,《申命记》中对此提出了反对。
2.Now, worship at these local altars and high places would come to be banned: Deuteronomy is going to polemicize against this.
那么,在当祭坛的崇拜,以及高地都被禁止:,《申命记》中对此提出了反对。
3.The author does not shy away from polemicizing 激烈争论 about controversial topics.
作者毫不避讳地对有争议的话题进行polemicizing 激烈争论。
4.His articles often polemicize 激烈争论 against popular opinions in the media.
他的文章经常针对媒体中的流行观点进行polemicize 激烈争论。
5.In her speech, she began to polemicize 激烈争论 about the effects of climate change.
在她的演讲中,她开始polemicize 激烈争论气候变化的影响。
6.Many politicians polemicize 激烈争论 to rally support from their base.
许多政治家通过polemicize 激烈争论来争取他们支持者的支持。
7.During the debate, she tended to polemicize 激烈争论 rather than listen to opposing views.
在辩论中,她倾向于polemicize 激烈争论而不是倾听对立的观点。
作文
In today's world, where opinions often clash and debates can become heated, the ability to polemicize is both a gift and a curse. To polemicize means to engage in controversial debate or dispute, often with a strong emphasis on one’s own point of view. This skill can be seen in various arenas, including politics, academia, and social media, where individuals and groups passionately defend their beliefs while simultaneously challenging opposing views.The art of polemicizing has been a part of human discourse for centuries. Historical figures such as Socrates and Voltaire are known for their ability to provoke thought and discussion through their polemical writings. They understood that to polemicize effectively, one must not only present arguments but also anticipate counterarguments and address them head-on. This approach not only strengthens one’s position but also encourages critical thinking among audiences.However, the modern landscape of communication presents unique challenges for those who wish to polemicize. With the rise of social media, the speed at which information spreads has increased dramatically. A single tweet or post can ignite a firestorm of debate, leading to polarized opinions and sometimes even hostility. In this environment, it is crucial to remember that while polemicizing can be a powerful tool for advocacy, it can also lead to division and conflict if not handled with care.Moreover, the effectiveness of polemicizing lies in the ability to balance passion with reason. When individuals become too emotionally invested in their arguments, they may resort to ad hominem attacks or logical fallacies, undermining their credibility. To engage in productive polemicizing, one must strive to remain respectful and open-minded, recognizing that differing perspectives can enrich the conversation rather than detract from it.In academic settings, polemicizing can serve as a catalyst for innovation and progress. Scholars often polemicize over theories and methodologies, pushing each other to refine their ideas and consider new possibilities. This intellectual sparring can lead to breakthroughs that benefit society as a whole. However, it is essential for academics to maintain a level of professionalism and respect, ensuring that debates do not devolve into personal attacks.In conclusion, the ability to polemicize is a double-edged sword. While it can foster dialogue and challenge the status quo, it can also lead to discord and misunderstanding. As we navigate an increasingly complex world, it is vital to approach polemicizing with a sense of responsibility and a commitment to constructive discourse. By doing so, we can harness the power of debate to promote understanding and collaboration, rather than division.Ultimately, whether in politics, academia, or everyday conversations, the skill to polemicize thoughtfully and respectfully can contribute to a more informed and engaged society. We must embrace the challenge of engaging with differing viewpoints while striving to communicate our own perspectives clearly and effectively.
在当今这个意见常常冲突、辩论可能变得激烈的世界里,polemicize 的能力既是一种天赋,也是一种诅咒。polemicize 的意思是参与有争议的辩论或争论,通常强调自己观点的重要性。这种技能可以在政治、学术和社交媒体等各种领域中看到,在这些领域中,个人和团体热情地捍卫自己的信仰,同时挑战对立的观点。polemicizing 的艺术已经成为人类话语的一部分几个世纪。历史人物如苏格拉底和伏尔泰以其挑衅性写作而闻名,他们能够引发思考和讨论。他们明白,要有效地 polemicize,不仅要提出论点,还必须预见反论点并直面它们。这种方法不仅加强了一个人的立场,而且鼓励听众进行批判性思考。然而,现代传播环境为那些希望 polemicize 的人带来了独特的挑战。随着社交媒体的兴起,信息传播的速度大幅增加。一条推文或帖子可以引发一场辩论的风暴,导致意见两极化,有时甚至是敌意。在这种环境中,重要的是要记住,虽然 polemicizing 可以是倡导的强大工具,但如果处理不当,也可能导致分裂和冲突。此外,polemicizing 的有效性在于平衡激情与理性。当个人对自己的论点过于情绪投资时,他们可能会诉诸人身攻击或逻辑谬误,从而削弱自己的可信度。为了进行富有成效的 polemicizing,人们必须努力保持尊重和开放的心态,认识到不同的观点可以丰富对话,而不是削弱对话。在学术环境中,polemicizing 可以作为创新和进步的催化剂。学者们经常 polemicize 理论和方法,推动彼此完善思想并考虑新的可能性。这种智力上的争论可以导致惠及整个社会的突破。然而,学者们必须保持专业和尊重,以确保辩论不会沦为人身攻击。总之,polemicize 的能力是一把双刃剑。虽然它可以促进对话并挑战现状,但也可能导致分歧和误解。随着我们在一个日益复杂的世界中导航,重要的是以一种责任感和对建设性话语的承诺来对待 polemicizing。通过这样做,我们可以利用辩论的力量促进理解和合作,而不是分裂。最终,无论是在政治、学术还是日常对话中,能够以深思熟虑和尊重的方式 polemicize 的技能都可以为一个更有知识和参与感的社会做出贡献。我们必须接受与不同观点接触的挑战,同时努力清晰有效地传达自己的观点。