obstructionist

简明释义

英[əbˈstrʌkʃənɪst]美[əbˈstrʌkʃənɪst]

n. 妨碍者；蓄意阻挠者

adj. 阻挠议事的；蓄意阻挠的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Presenters wear Oscar-style fancy dress, sing a little ditty, and give third-, second- and first-prize awards for the most obstructionist, climate-unfriendly negotiating position.

主持人身着奥斯卡奇异的服装，吟唱的小曲，为最阻扰，最不友好的谈判方颁发一二三等奖。

2.The Fossil-of-the-Day Award has proven to be an effective media tool for highlighting the obstructionist tactics used by many countries.

化石日奖以及在许多国家被证明是一种有效的强调阻碍政策的媒体工具。

3.It has been weakened by the turmoil in Syria, hitherto its chief obstructionist sponsor.

迄今为止它最主要的支持者叙利亚的国内动荡大大削弱了它的力量。

4.Speaking on the CBS program Face the Nation, Corker rejected suggestion that Republicans are being obstructionist.

考克在哥伦比亚广播公司的“面向全国”的电视节目上驳斥了所谓共和党人在蓄意阻挠的说法。

5.Presenters wear Oscar-style fancy dress, sing a little ditty, and give third-, second- and first-prize awards for the most obstructionist, climate-unfriendly negotiating position.

主持人身着奥斯卡奇异的服装，吟唱的小曲，为最阻扰，最不友好的谈判方颁发一二三等奖。

6.Speaking on the CBS program Face the Nation, Corker rejected any suggestion that Republicans are being obstructionist.

考克在哥伦比亚广播公司的“面向全国”的电视节目上驳斥了所谓共和党人在蓄意阻挠的说法。

7.Critics argue that the obstructionist 阻碍者 tactics are harming the legislative process.

批评者认为，obstructionist 阻碍者的策略正在损害立法进程。

8.Many believe that being an obstructionist 阻碍者 is detrimental to democracy.

许多人认为，成为一个obstructionist 阻碍者对民主是有害的。

9.The obstructionist 阻碍者 minority in Congress blocked the passage of key reforms.

国会中的obstructionist 阻碍者少数派阻止了关键改革的通过。

10.The senator was labeled as an obstructionist 阻碍者 for refusing to support the new healthcare bill.

这位参议员因拒绝支持新的医疗法案而被称为obstructionist 阻碍者。

11.His obstructionist 阻碍者 behavior during the negotiations frustrated many of his colleagues.

他在谈判中的obstructionist 阻碍者行为让许多同事感到沮丧。

作文

In the realm of politics, the term obstructionist refers to individuals or groups that deliberately hinder or impede progress in legislative processes. These obstructionists often utilize various tactics to stall discussions, block votes, and prevent the passage of laws that they oppose. Understanding the role of obstructionists is crucial for anyone interested in the dynamics of political systems and governance.Throughout history, we have seen numerous examples of obstructionists in action. For instance, during the civil rights movement in the United States, many legislators adopted obstructionist strategies to delay or defeat legislation aimed at promoting equality and justice for all citizens. Their actions not only reflected a resistance to change but also highlighted the deep-seated divisions within society regarding race and equality.The tactics employed by obstructionists can vary widely. Some may resort to filibustering, where they prolong debate to prevent a vote on a bill. Others might engage in procedural maneuvers to force a delay or invoke rules that require supermajorities for certain decisions. These strategies can lead to frustration among those who seek to advance important policies, as the actions of obstructionists can result in significant gridlock and inefficiency in government.Moreover, the impact of obstructionists extends beyond the immediate legislative battles. When progress is consistently stalled, it can erode public trust in governmental institutions. Citizens may become disillusioned with the political process if they perceive that elected officials are more focused on obstructing each other rather than addressing pressing issues such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. This disillusionment can lead to lower voter turnout and increased apathy towards civic engagement.In contemporary politics, the presence of obstructionists has become increasingly pronounced. With heightened partisanship, members of opposing parties often find themselves in a constant state of conflict, leading to an environment where obstructionist tactics are more readily employed. This situation raises questions about the effectiveness of democratic processes and whether the system can function optimally when one party consistently works to undermine the efforts of another.However, it is essential to recognize that not all opposition is inherently obstructionist. Healthy debate and dissent are vital components of a functioning democracy. Constructive criticism and alternative viewpoints can lead to better policymaking and ensure that diverse perspectives are considered. The challenge lies in distinguishing between genuine opposition that fosters dialogue and obstructionist behavior that seeks to stifle progress.To combat the negative effects of obstructionism, voters must hold their representatives accountable. Engaging in the political process, advocating for transparency, and supporting candidates who prioritize collaboration over division can help mitigate the influence of obstructionists. Furthermore, fostering a culture of compromise and understanding within political discourse can pave the way for more effective governance.In conclusion, the term obstructionist encapsulates a significant challenge within political systems. While opposition is a natural aspect of democracy, when it devolves into obstruction, it can hinder progress and diminish public trust. By recognizing the tactics of obstructionists and advocating for constructive dialogue, citizens can work towards a more effective and responsive government that serves the needs of all its constituents.

在政治领域中，术语obstructionist指的是故意阻碍或妨碍立法进程的个人或团体。这些obstructionists通常利用各种策略来拖延讨论、阻止投票以及阻止他们反对的法律的通过。理解obstructionists的角色对于任何对政治系统和治理动态感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的。在历史上，我们看到许多obstructionists的例子。例如，在美国的民权运动期间，许多立法者采用了obstructionist策略，以延迟或击败旨在促进所有公民平等与正义的立法。他们的行为不仅反映了对变革的抵制，也突显了社会在种族和平等问题上的根深蒂固的分歧。Obstructionists使用的策略可以有很大的不同。有些人可能会采取冗长辩论的方式，延长讨论时间以阻止对某项法案的投票。其他人可能会进行程序性操作，迫使延迟或引用需要超多数票才能做出某些决定的规则。这些策略可能导致那些寻求推进重要政策的人的挫败感，因为obstructionists的行为可能导致政府的重大僵局和低效。此外，obstructionists的影响超出了直接的立法斗争。当进展持续停滞时，这可能会侵蚀公众对政府机构的信任。如果公民认为当选官员更专注于相互阻碍而不是解决医疗保健、教育和基础设施等紧迫问题，这种情况可能导致公众失望，从而导致投票率下降和对公民参与的增加冷漠。在当代政治中，obstructionists的存在变得愈发明显。随着党派之间的对立加剧，反对党成员往往处于持续冲突的状态，这导致了一个环境，其中obstructionist策略被更频繁地使用。这种情况引发了关于民主过程有效性的质疑，以及当一个政党不断努力破坏另一个政党的努力时，系统是否能够最佳运作。然而，必须认识到，并非所有的反对意见都是固有的obstructionist。健康的辩论和异议是正常民主的重要组成部分。建设性的批评和替代观点可以导致更好的政策制定，并确保考虑到多样化的视角。挑战在于区分真正促进对话的反对意见和试图抑制进展的obstructionist行为。为了应对obstructionism的负面影响，选民必须对其代表负责。参与政治过程、倡导透明度以及支持优先考虑合作而非分裂的候选人，可以帮助减轻obstructionists的影响。此外，在政治话语中培养妥协和理解的文化，可以为更有效的治理铺平道路。总之，术语obstructionist概括了政治系统中的一个重大挑战。尽管反对是民主的自然方面，但当这种反对退化为阻碍时，它可能会妨碍进展并削弱公众信任。通过认识到obstructionists的策略并倡导建设性对话，公民可以朝着一个更有效和响应政府的方向努力，服务于所有选民的需求。