pontific

简明释义

英[/pɒnˈtɪfɪk/]美[/pɒnˈtɪfɪk/]

adj. 自以为是的；武断的（等于 pontifical）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The professor's pontific style made it hard for students to engage in a dialogue.

教授的教皇式的风格使学生很难参与对话。

2.He often adopts a pontific tone when discussing politics, which can alienate his listeners.

他在讨论政治时常常采取教皇式的语气，这可能会使听众感到疏远。

3.During the meeting, he tended to be quite pontific, often speaking as if he were the ultimate authority on the subject.

在会议期间，他往往显得相当教皇式的，常常像是这个话题的终极权威。

4.The article was filled with pontific statements that lacked supporting evidence.

这篇文章充满了缺乏证据支持的教皇式的陈述。

5.Her pontific remarks about the project left little room for discussion among the team members.

她关于项目的教皇式的评论几乎没有给团队成员留下讨论的空间。

作文

In today's world, where opinions are abundant and discussions often turn heated, the term pontific can describe a certain type of communication that is both authoritative and sometimes condescending. To pontific means to speak or express one's opinions in a way that suggests one is infallible or has superior knowledge on the subject at hand. This behavior can be seen in various contexts, from casual conversations among friends to formal debates in academic settings.Consider the scenario of a group discussion about climate change. Some participants might share their views based on personal experiences or scientific studies, while others may pontific about the topic, asserting their opinions as the ultimate truth without acknowledging differing perspectives. This attitude can stifle open dialogue and discourage others from contributing, as they may feel intimidated by the self-proclaimed authority of the pontificator.The tendency to pontific can also be observed in social media platforms, where individuals often present their thoughts as facts, leading to misinformation and polarized opinions. For instance, during a heated political debate, one might find users who pontific about their preferred candidates or policies, disregarding any evidence that contradicts their beliefs. This not only creates echo chambers but also diminishes the quality of discourse.In academia, professors and experts sometimes fall into the trap of pontific when discussing their fields of expertise. While it is important for educators to convey their knowledge confidently, there is a fine line between sharing insights and asserting dominance over the conversation. When a scholar pontific about a particular theory without inviting questions or alternative viewpoints, they risk alienating students and colleagues alike.Moreover, pontific behavior can manifest in everyday life, such as during family gatherings or friendly debates. Imagine a dinner party where one guest begins to pontific about the best way to raise children, citing their personal experience as the only valid approach. Such statements can create discomfort and tension among other guests who may have different parenting philosophies.To combat the negative effects of pontific communication, it is essential to foster an environment that values humility and open-mindedness. Encouraging individuals to listen actively and engage in respectful dialogue can help mitigate the urge to pontific. By acknowledging that no one has all the answers, we create a space where diverse perspectives can coexist and enrich the conversation.In conclusion, while expressing opinions confidently is important, we must be wary of the tendency to pontific. Whether in casual discussions or formal debates, embracing a more inclusive approach fosters better understanding and collaboration. By recognizing the value of different viewpoints and engaging in thoughtful dialogue, we can move away from the pitfalls of pontific communication and towards a more constructive exchange of ideas.

在当今这个意见丰富、讨论常常变得激烈的世界里，术语pontific可以描述一种既权威又有时显得居高临下的交流方式。pontific意味着以一种暗示自己无误或在讨论主题上拥有超越他人知识的方式来表达自己的观点。这种行为可以在各种场合中看到，从朋友之间的随意对话到学术环境中的正式辩论。考虑一下关于气候变化的小组讨论场景。一些参与者可能会根据个人经验或科学研究分享他们的看法，而其他人可能会pontific这个主题，断言自己的观点是最终真理，而不承认不同的视角。这种态度可能会抑制开放的对话，阻止其他人发表意见，因为他们可能会觉得被自称权威的pontificator所压制。pontific的倾向在社交媒体平台上也很明显，个人经常将自己的想法呈现为事实，从而导致错误信息和极化的观点。例如，在一场激烈的政治辩论中，人们可能会发现用户在pontific他们所支持的候选人或政策，忽略任何与其信念相悖的证据。这不仅创造了回声室，还降低了话语的质量。在学术界，教授和专家有时在讨论自己的专业领域时也会陷入pontific的陷阱。虽然教育工作者自信地传达他们的知识是重要的，但分享见解与在对话中宣称主导地位之间有一个微妙的界限。当学者在没有邀请问题或替代观点的情况下pontific某个特定理论时，他们就冒着疏远学生和同事的风险。此外，pontific行为还可以在日常生活中表现出来，例如在家庭聚会或友好的辩论中。想象一下一个晚宴派对，其中一位客人开始pontific关于养育孩子的最佳方法，引用他们的个人经验作为唯一有效的方法。这种说法可能会在其他客人中造成不适和紧张，因为他们可能有不同的育儿哲学。为了抵消pontific沟通的负面影响，培养一种重视谦逊和开放心态的环境至关重要。鼓励个人积极倾听并参与尊重的对话可以帮助减轻pontific的冲动。通过承认没有人拥有所有答案，我们创造了一个不同观点可以共存并丰富对话的空间。总之，虽然自信地表达观点很重要，但我们必须警惕pontific的倾向。无论是在随意讨论还是正式辩论中，拥抱更具包容性的方法促进更好的理解与合作。通过认识到不同观点的价值并参与深思熟虑的对话，我们可以摆脱pontific沟通的陷阱，走向更具建设性的思想交流。