demagogy

简明释义

英[ˈdeməɡɒɡi]美[ˈdeməɡɑːɡi]

n. 煽动家的方法与行为

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.That is the thing about demagogy: it can be charming, even dazzling, and that is what makes it all the more dangerous.

蛊惑人心的言论就是这样：它可以很迷人，甚至光芒四射，这正是它更危险的地方。

2.The majority of parents believe that the Chinese secondary school students now may not be able to achieve the acceptance of this and more parents say this is accused of demagogy.

家长们多数认为，中国现在的中学生不一定能达到这种接受程度，更有家长指责此说是哗众取宠。

3.Election campaigns have always been riddled with demagogy and worse.

选举活动总是充斥了煽动和坏事。

4.In this climate, Otto Frank was unable to get visas for his family members, who were victims in part of American paranoia, demagogy and indifference.

在此种氛围下，奥托·弗兰克无法取得签证，一家人遂成为美国人的善惊多疑、煽动民意与冷漠无情的受害者。

5.The majority of parents believe that the Chinese secondary school students now may not be able to achieve the acceptance of this and more parents say this is accused of demagogy.

家长们多数认为，中国现在的中学生不一定能达到这种接受程度，更有家长指责此说是哗众取宠。

6.This was demagogy outsmarting itself.

这是弄巧反拙的煽动。

7.The rise of demagogy in social media has changed the landscape of modern politics.

社交媒体上煽动性言论的兴起改变了现代政治的格局。

8.The politician's speech was filled with demagogy, appealing to the crowd's emotions rather than their reason.

这位政治家的演讲充满了煽动性言论，诉诸于人群的情感而非理智。

9.Many leaders resort to demagogy during elections to gain support from the masses.

许多领导人在选举期间诉诸于煽动性言论以赢得大众的支持。

10.In times of crisis, demagogy can be a powerful tool for manipulating public opinion.

在危机时期，煽动性言论可以成为操纵公众舆论的有力工具。

11.Critics argue that his use of demagogy undermines the integrity of political discourse.

批评者认为他使用的煽动性言论破坏了政治话语的完整性。

作文

In today's political climate, the term demagogy is often thrown around, yet many people may not fully understand its implications. Demagogy refers to a political strategy that seeks to gain power by appealing to the emotions, fears, and prejudices of the populace rather than using rational argumentation. This approach can be seen throughout history and continues to manifest in modern politics. One of the most alarming aspects of demagogy is its potential to manipulate public opinion. Politicians who resort to this tactic often use inflammatory rhetoric to stir up anger or fear among their constituents. For instance, during election seasons, candidates may exaggerate threats or create scapegoats to rally support. By doing so, they divert attention from substantive issues and instead focus on emotional responses. This can lead to a polarized society where individuals are more likely to align themselves with extreme viewpoints rather than engaging in constructive dialogue. Moreover, demagogy can undermine democratic processes. When leaders prioritize emotional appeals over factual information, they risk eroding trust in institutions and the media. Citizens may become disillusioned, believing that their voices do not matter if they are simply being manipulated for political gain. This disconnection can result in lower voter turnout and increased apathy towards civic engagement, which are detrimental to a healthy democracy. History provides numerous examples of how demagogy has shaped societies. Leaders like Adolf Hitler and Joseph McCarthy utilized fear-mongering tactics to consolidate power and suppress dissent. Their ability to tap into the collective anxieties of their populations allowed them to enact policies that had devastating consequences. These historical lessons remind us of the importance of critical thinking and media literacy in combating demagogy. In contrast, effective leadership should be grounded in facts and reasoned debate. Politicians who engage in substantive discussions about policy and governance are far more likely to foster an informed electorate. Encouraging open dialogue and promoting diverse perspectives can counteract the divisive nature of demagogy. As citizens, we also bear the responsibility of recognizing demagogy when it arises. Being aware of the signs—such as overly simplistic solutions to complex problems or the vilification of certain groups—can empower us to resist such tactics. Engaging in critical analysis of political messages and demanding accountability from our leaders are essential steps in preserving the integrity of our democratic systems. In conclusion, while demagogy may seem like a mere buzzword, its consequences are far-reaching and significant. Understanding its definition and recognizing its manifestations in our political discourse is crucial for fostering a more informed and engaged citizenry. As we navigate the complexities of modern governance, let us strive for a political landscape that values reason over emotion, unity over division, and truth over manipulation.

在当今的政治气候中，术语demagogy常常被提及，但许多人可能并不完全理解其含义。Demagogy指的是一种政治策略，旨在通过诉诸民众的情感、恐惧和偏见来获取权力，而不是使用理性的论证。这种方法在历史上屡见不鲜，并且在现代政治中仍然表现出来。Demagogy最令人担忧的一个方面是它操纵公众舆论的潜力。那些采取这种策略的政治家通常会使用煽动性言辞来激起选民的愤怒或恐惧。例如，在选举季节，候选人可能会夸大威胁或制造替罪羊来争取支持。通过这样做，他们转移了对实质性问题的关注，而是专注于情感反应。这可能导致一个极化的社会，其中个人更有可能与极端观点对齐，而不是参与建设性的对话。此外，demagogy还可能破坏民主过程。当领导者优先考虑情感诉求而非事实信息时，他们可能会冒着侵蚀公众对机构和媒体信任的风险。公民可能会变得失望，认为如果他们只是被操控以获取政治利益，他们的声音就没有意义。这种脱节可能导致投票率下降和对公民参与的冷漠，这对健康的民主制度是有害的。历史提供了许多关于demagogy如何塑造社会的例子。像阿道夫·希特勒和约瑟夫·麦卡锡这样的领导者利用恐惧煽动策略来巩固权力和压制异议。他们能够利用人民集体焦虑的能力，使他们能够实施具有毁灭性后果的政策。这些历史教训提醒我们，在抵制demagogy时，批判性思维和媒体素养的重要性。相反，有效的领导应建立在事实和理性辩论的基础上。参与关于政策和治理的实质性讨论的政治家，更有可能培养出一个知情的选民。鼓励开放对话和促进多元化视角，可以抵消demagogy的分裂性质。作为公民，我们也承担着识别demagogy出现时的责任。意识到征兆——例如，对复杂问题的过于简单的解决方案或对某些群体的妖魔化——可以使我们有能力抵制这些策略。对政治信息进行批判性分析并要求我们的领导者问责，是维护民主制度完整性的必要步骤。总之，尽管demagogy似乎只是一个流行词，但其后果是深远且重要的。理解其定义并识别其在我们政治话语中的表现，对于促进一个更知情和参与的公民社会至关重要。在我们驾驭现代治理的复杂性时，让我们努力追求一个重视理性而非情感、团结而非分裂、真相而非操控的政治格局。