corporatism

简明释义

英[ˈkɔːpərətɪzəm]美[ˈkɔːrpərətɪzəm]

n. 社团主义；组合主义（等于 corporativism）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.It is fascinating that politicians would use the language of the free market in this way to justify more corporatism.

有趣的是政客们这样使用自由市场的术语来正义化更多的社团主义。

2.Over the past few years those continental European countries have been gradually shedding their old corporatism and learning new tricks from the Anglo-Saxons.

在过去数年里，欧陆也渐渐抛弃了传统的公司制度，开始向盎格鲁萨格斯风格学习。

3.In the extraction-oriented model, township governance evolved into "direct confrontation", township corporatism governance model is the reference in eastern regional rural governance experience.

乡镇公司主义模式是借鉴东部地区的乡镇治理经验。

4."The age of corporatism must be put firmly behind us," he proclaimed.

“必须坚决让社团主义时代成为过去，”他宣布。

5.The varieties of corporatism in varied times are the same or similar with each other in theoretic character.

这一思潮在各个不同的历史时期有不同的表现形态，但却存在一些共同的理论特征。

6.Mr Goldthwaite subtly suggests that they lacked a strong competitive capitalist instinct: "Their behaviour at home and abroad often reveals an underlying spirit of corporatism."

高德斯·威特先生敏锐的指出，他们缺少资本家强烈的竞争本能：“无论国内国外，他们的行为总是反映出一种潜在社团主义精神罢了。”

7.In the extraction-oriented model, township governance evolved into "direct confrontation", township corporatism governance model is the reference in eastern regional rural governance experience.

乡镇公司主义模式是借鉴东部地区的乡镇治理经验。

8.The rise of corporatism 企业主义 can be seen in the increasing power of lobby groups in politics.

在政治中，企业主义的兴起可以通过游说团体权力的增加来观察。

9.The government adopted a model of corporatism 企业主义 to enhance cooperation between labor and management.

政府采用了企业主义模式，以增强劳工与管理层之间的合作。

10.In many countries, corporatism 企业主义 has influenced the way government and businesses interact.

在许多国家，企业主义影响了政府与企业之间的互动方式。

11.Critics argue that corporatism 企业主义 undermines democratic processes by prioritizing corporate interests.

批评者认为，企业主义通过优先考虑企业利益而削弱了民主进程。

12.Some economists believe that corporatism 企业主义 can lead to more stable economic policies.

一些经济学家认为，企业主义可以导致更稳定的经济政策。

作文

In contemporary political discourse, the term corporatism refers to a system of governance where various interest groups, such as businesses, labor unions, and other organizations, are integrated into the decision-making process of the state. This model stands in contrast to liberal democracy, which emphasizes individual rights and the separation of powers. Understanding corporatism requires us to explore its historical roots, implications for society, and its relevance in today's world.Historically, corporatism emerged in the early 20th century as a response to the challenges posed by industrialization and the rise of labor movements. Governments sought to create stability by incorporating organized interests into the political system. For instance, in countries like Italy and Spain during the fascist era, corporatism was used to suppress dissent and maintain control over various sectors of society. The state would negotiate with different groups to reach consensus, often sidelining individual citizens in favor of collective interests.One of the primary characteristics of corporatism is its focus on collaboration between the state and organized groups. This partnership can lead to more coherent policy-making, as the government can draw on the expertise and resources of these groups. However, it also raises concerns about the potential for elitism, where only certain voices are heard while others are marginalized. Critics argue that corporatism can undermine democracy by reducing transparency and accountability in governance.In the modern context, corporatism has taken on new forms. Many countries have adopted elements of this system, particularly in their economic policies. For example, Scandinavian countries are often cited as examples of successful corporatism, where strong labor unions and business associations collaborate with the government to create social welfare policies that benefit the broader population. This model has led to high levels of social equality and economic stability, showcasing how corporatism can be adapted to promote democratic values rather than suppress them.However, the rise of globalization has posed challenges to traditional corporatism. As multinational corporations gain power, they can influence national policies in ways that may not align with the interests of local workers or smaller businesses. This shift can lead to a form of corporatism that favors large corporations at the expense of broader societal interests, raising questions about who truly benefits from this system.Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of cooperation between the state and various sectors of society. In many cases, governments have had to rely on the expertise of businesses and health organizations to navigate the crisis. This reliance can be seen as a form of corporatism, where the state collaborates with specific interest groups to address urgent issues. However, it also underscores the need for a balance between collaboration and accountability, ensuring that all voices are considered in the decision-making process.In conclusion, corporatism is a complex and evolving concept that plays a significant role in shaping political and economic landscapes. While it offers potential benefits in terms of stability and policy coherence, it also poses risks related to elitism and the marginalization of individual voices. As we continue to navigate the challenges of the modern world, understanding the dynamics of corporatism will be essential to fostering a more inclusive and equitable society.

企业主义是指一种治理体系，其中各种利益团体，如企业、工会和其他组织，融入国家的决策过程。这种模式与强调个人权利和权力分立的自由民主形成对比。理解企业主义需要我们探索其历史根源、对社会的影响及其在当今世界的相关性。历史上，企业主义在20世纪初作为对工业化和劳工运动带来的挑战的回应而出现。各国政府试图通过将有组织的利益纳入政治体系来创造稳定。例如，在意大利和西班牙的法西斯时代，企业主义被用来压制异议并保持对社会各个领域的控制。国家会与不同团体进行谈判以达成共识，常常将个别公民置于集体利益的边缘。企业主义的一个主要特征是其对国家与有组织团体之间合作的关注。这种伙伴关系可以导致更连贯的政策制定，因为政府可以利用这些团体的专业知识和资源。然而，它也引发了关于精英主义的潜在担忧，即只有某些声音被听到，而其他声音则被边缘化。批评者认为，企业主义可能通过减少治理的透明度和问责制来削弱民主。在现代背景下，企业主义呈现出新的形式。许多国家在其经济政策中采用了这种体系的元素。例如，斯堪的纳维亚国家常被视为成功的企业主义的例子，在这些国家，强大的工会和商业协会与政府合作，制定惠及广大民众的社会福利政策。这一模式导致了高度的社会平等和经济稳定，展示了如何调整企业主义以促进民主价值观，而不是压制它们。然而，全球化的兴起对传统的企业主义构成了挑战。随着跨国公司的崛起，它们可以以不符合当地工人或小型企业利益的方式影响国家政策。这种转变可能导致一种偏向大公司的企业主义，从而损害更广泛的社会利益，引发关于这一体系真正受益者的问题。此外，COVID-19大流行突显了国家与社会各个部门之间合作的重要性。在许多情况下，政府不得不依赖企业和卫生组织的专业知识来应对危机。这种依赖可以被视为一种企业主义，即国家与特定利益团体合作以解决紧迫问题。然而，这也强调了在合作与问责之间保持平衡的必要性，确保所有声音在决策过程中得到考虑。总之，企业主义是一个复杂而不断演变的概念，在塑造政治和经济格局方面发挥着重要作用。虽然它在稳定性和政策一致性方面提供了潜在的好处，但也带来了与精英主义和个体声音边缘化相关的风险。随着我们继续应对现代世界的挑战，理解企业主义的动态对于促进一个更加包容和公平的社会至关重要。