prescriptivism

简明释义

英[prɪˈskrɪptɪvɪzəm]美[prɪˈskrɪptəˌvɪzəm]

n. 规范主义；规约论；指示论

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Firstly, the thesis illustrates the commonly used principles in the work of dictionary-making: prescriptivism and descriptivism, and studies each principle thoroughly.

首先文章对词典编纂中的两个主要原则即：规定主义原则和描写主义原则做了介绍。

2.In its most general sense, prescriptivism is the view that one variety of language has an inherently higher value than others, and that this ought to be imposed on the whole of the speech community.

从最普遍的意义上说，规定主义指一种语言比其他语言具有更高的内在价值，而这种价值应该强加于整个语言群体。

3.Firstly, the thesis illustrates the commonly used principles in the work of dictionary-making: prescriptivism and descriptivism, and studies each principle thoroughly.

首先文章对词典编纂中的两个主要原则即：规定主义原则和描写主义原则做了介绍。

4.This paper attempts to illustrate the important role of costume in the whole opera performance from three aspects-symbolism, prescriptivism, and the nature of dance.

本文试图从象征性、规定性、舞蹈性三方面来阐释戏剧服饰在整个戏曲表演中的重要作用。

5.Some linguists believe that prescriptivism is necessary for clear communication.

一些语言学家认为规范主义对于清晰沟通是必要的。

6.Critics of prescriptivism argue that it stifles creativity in language use.

批评规范主义的人认为它抑制了语言使用中的创造力。

7.The debate between descriptive linguistics and prescriptivism has been ongoing for decades.

描述语言学和规范主义之间的辩论已经持续了几十年。

8.In a world of evolving language, prescriptivism can seem outdated.

在一个语言不断发展的世界里，规范主义可能显得过时。

9.Many teachers advocate for prescriptivism to maintain standards in writing.

许多教师提倡规范主义以维持写作标准。

作文

Language is a living entity that evolves over time, reflecting the culture and society it serves. However, the debate between descriptive and prescriptive approaches to language use remains a significant topic among linguists, educators, and language enthusiasts. One of the key terms in this discussion is prescriptivism, which refers to the belief that there are specific rules and norms that govern the proper use of language. Proponents of prescriptivism argue that adhering to these rules is essential for effective communication and maintaining the integrity of a language. They often advocate for traditional grammar rules, standardized spelling, and formal writing styles, believing that such standards help prevent confusion and miscommunication.On the other hand, critics of prescriptivism argue that language should be fluid and adaptable, reflecting the natural changes and variations that occur over time. They emphasize the importance of descriptive approaches, which focus on how language is actually used by speakers in different contexts. This perspective highlights the richness of linguistic diversity and the ways in which language can evolve to meet the needs of its users. In contrast to the rigid rules of prescriptivism, descriptive linguistics celebrates the creativity and adaptability of language.The tension between prescriptivism and descriptivism can be observed in various aspects of language, such as grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation. For instance, many traditional grammar books adhere strictly to the rules of prescriptivism, often labeling certain constructions as incorrect or improper. However, language is inherently dynamic, and many so-called 'incorrect' usages become widely accepted over time. This raises important questions about who gets to decide what is 'correct' and 'incorrect' in language use.In educational settings, the influence of prescriptivism can be seen in the way grammar is taught. Many English teachers emphasize the importance of following grammatical rules and using formal language, which can lead to a fear of making mistakes among students. This fear can stifle creativity and hinder the development of a more authentic voice in writing. Conversely, a more descriptive approach to teaching language can empower students to experiment with their language use, encouraging them to find their unique style while still being aware of the conventions of formal writing.Furthermore, the rise of digital communication has introduced new challenges to the debate between prescriptivism and descriptivism. Social media platforms and texting have given rise to new forms of expression, often characterized by informal language, abbreviations, and emojis. While some purists may view these innovations as a decline in language quality, others see them as an exciting evolution of language that reflects contemporary culture and communication practices. This ongoing transformation illustrates the need for a balanced perspective that recognizes both the value of established norms and the importance of linguistic innovation.In conclusion, the concept of prescriptivism plays a crucial role in the ongoing dialogue about language use and its evolution. While there is merit in maintaining certain standards to facilitate clear communication, it is equally important to embrace the fluidity of language and acknowledge the diverse ways in which it is used. Ultimately, a more nuanced understanding of prescriptivism can lead to a richer appreciation of language as a dynamic and ever-changing medium of human expression. By finding a balance between prescriptive rules and descriptive realities, we can foster a more inclusive and flexible approach to language that respects both tradition and innovation.

语言是一种活的实体，随着时间的推移而发展，反映出它所服务的文化和社会。然而，描述性和规定性语言使用方法之间的辩论仍然是语言学家、教育工作者和语言爱好者之间的重要话题。在这个讨论中，一个关键术语是prescriptivism，它指的是认为有特定的规则和规范来指导语言的正确使用。prescriptivism的支持者认为，遵循这些规则对于有效沟通和维护语言的完整性至关重要。他们通常提倡传统的语法规则、标准化的拼写和正式的写作风格，认为这样的标准有助于防止混淆和误解。另一方面，prescriptivism的批评者则认为，语言应该是流动和适应的，反映出随着时间推移而发生的自然变化和变异。他们强调描述性方法的重要性，关注语言在不同语境中的实际使用。这一观点突显了语言多样性的丰富性以及语言如何演变以满足其使用者的需求。与prescriptivism的严格规则相对，描述性语言学庆祝语言的创造力和适应性。prescriptivism和描述主义之间的紧张关系可以在语言的各个方面观察到，例如语法、词汇和发音。例如，许多传统的语法书严格遵循prescriptivism的规则，通常将某些结构标记为不正确或不恰当。然而，语言本质上是动态的，许多所谓的“错误”用法随着时间的推移变得被广泛接受。这引发了关于谁有权决定语言使用中的“正确”和“不正确”的重要问题。在教育环境中，prescriptivism的影响可以在语法教学方式中看到。许多英语教师强调遵循语法规则和使用正式语言的重要性，这可能导致学生对犯错误的恐惧。这种恐惧可能抑制创造力并妨碍更真实的写作声音的发展。相反，更具描述性的方法可以使学生能够尝试他们的语言使用，鼓励他们找到自己的独特风格，同时仍然意识到正式写作的惯例。此外，数字通信的兴起给prescriptivism和描述主义之间的辩论带来了新的挑战。社交媒体平台和短信产生了新的表达形式，通常以非正式语言、缩写和表情符号为特征。虽然一些纯粹主义者可能会将这些创新视为语言质量下降，但其他人则将其视为一种令人兴奋的语言演变，反映了当代文化和交流实践。这一持续的转变说明需要一种平衡的视角，既承认既定规范的价值，也重视语言创新的重要性。总之，prescriptivism的概念在关于语言使用及其演变的持续对话中扮演着至关重要的角色。虽然维持某些标准以促进清晰沟通是有意义的，但同样重要的是要接受语言的流动性，并承认它被使用的多样方式。最终，对prescriptivism的更细致理解可以导致对语言作为一种动态且不断变化的人类表达媒介的更丰富欣赏。通过在规定性规则和描述性现实之间找到平衡，我们可以培养一种更包容和灵活的语言观，尊重传统与创新。