preprint

简明释义

英[ˈpriːprɪnt]美[priˈprɪnt]

v. 预印

n. 预印本

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The results are in a paper submitted to the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and published on the physics preprint website arxiv.org.

这一结论发表在皇家天文学院月刊和物理预印网站arxiv.org上。

2.This research is published by the Astrophysical Journal, and the preprint is available on arxiv.org.

该研究发表在《天体物理学杂志》上，可以在arxiv.org上查阅预览。

3.Thank you for sending me the preprint of your Disproof.

感谢您将你的否定论文的预印本发给我。

4.However, their analysis, published last Friday on the arXiv preprint server, implies that more-precise data could confirm the existence of a multiverse.

尽管如此，刊登在上周五《arXiv》预印数据库中的分析，预示着更准确的数据将能证明多重宇宙的存在。

5.Since then, papers have gushed into the physics preprint website (arxiv.org) suggesting numerous ways to account for the extraordinary claim.

此后，许多论文已经涌到了物理学的预印网站(arxiv.org)，建议以多种方式来考虑这些额外的声称。

6.You can read a preprint of the paper here.

你可以在这里阅读的论文预印本。

7.A preprint suggests that verifiers competing for the same reward have an incentive to withhold the information needed to do so.

预印本表明，核查者争用相同的报酬却有需要隐瞒做法的动机。

8.However, their analysis, published last Friday on the arXiv preprint server, implies that more-precise data could confirm the existence of a multiverse.

尽管如此，刊登在上周五《arXiv》预印数据库中的分析，预示着更准确的数据将能证明多重宇宙的存在。

9.Many scientists are now using preprints to disseminate their work quickly.

许多科学家现在使用预印本快速传播他们的工作。

10.The preprint server allows authors to receive feedback from peers before peer review.

该预印本服务器允许作者在同行评审之前获得同行的反馈。

11.The researchers uploaded their findings as a preprint to share them with the community before formal publication.

研究人员将他们的发现作为预印本上传，以便在正式发表之前与社区分享。

12.Submitting a preprint can help establish priority for an idea or discovery.

提交预印本可以帮助确立一个想法或发现的优先权。

13.The journal accepted the article after it had been available as a preprint for six months.

期刊在文章以预印本形式发布六个月后接受了该文章。

作文

In the modern academic landscape, the term preprint refers to a version of a scholarly paper that precedes formal peer review and publication in a scientific journal. The emergence of preprints has revolutionized the way researchers disseminate their findings and engage with the scientific community. Traditionally, researchers would conduct experiments, write their papers, submit them to journals, and then wait for the lengthy peer review process to conclude before their work was made public. However, this process can take months or even years, delaying the sharing of important discoveries with other scientists and the public. By contrast, preprints allow researchers to share their results almost immediately, facilitating faster communication and collaboration within the scientific community.The rise of online platforms dedicated to preprints, such as arXiv, bioRxiv, and SSRN, has made it easier than ever for researchers to upload their manuscripts. This shift not only accelerates the dissemination of knowledge but also provides an opportunity for authors to receive feedback from their peers before submitting their work to a journal. In essence, preprints serve as a form of open science, promoting transparency and collaboration among researchers.One of the key advantages of preprints is that they can help establish priority for a particular discovery. When a researcher uploads their manuscript as a preprint, they effectively stake a claim to their findings, which can be crucial in competitive fields where multiple teams may be working on similar problems. Additionally, preprints can attract attention from journalists and the public, potentially leading to increased funding opportunities or collaborations.However, the rise of preprints is not without its challenges. Since preprints are not peer-reviewed, there is a risk that unverified or flawed research may be disseminated widely. This has raised concerns about the potential for misinformation, especially in fields like medicine and public health. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, several preprints were published that contained inaccurate data or unsupported claims, leading to confusion and concern among the public and policymakers. As a result, it is essential for readers to approach preprints with a critical eye, understanding that these documents have not undergone rigorous evaluation by experts.Moreover, some researchers worry that the proliferation of preprints may affect the traditional publishing model. Journals are often seen as gatekeepers of quality, and the increasing reliance on preprints could undermine the perceived value of peer review. Nevertheless, many journals now encourage authors to submit their preprints alongside their formal submissions, recognizing the importance of rapid dissemination of research.In conclusion, preprints represent a significant shift in the way scientific research is shared and evaluated. They offer numerous benefits, including faster dissemination of findings, increased collaboration, and the establishment of priority for discoveries. However, the challenges associated with preprints highlight the need for careful consideration and critical evaluation of research that has not yet been peer-reviewed. As the academic community continues to adapt to this new paradigm, the role of preprints will undoubtedly evolve, shaping the future of scientific communication and collaboration.

在现代学术界，术语preprint指的是一篇学术论文的版本，该版本在正式同行评审和在科学期刊上发表之前出现。preprints的出现彻底改变了研究人员传播其发现和与科学界互动的方式。传统上，研究人员会进行实验，撰写论文，将其提交给期刊，然后等待漫长的同行评审过程结束，才会公开他们的工作。然而，这一过程可能需要几个月甚至几年的时间，从而延迟了重要发现与其他科学家和公众的分享。相比之下，preprints允许研究人员几乎立即分享他们的结果，从而促进了科学界内部更快的沟通与合作。专门针对preprints的在线平台的兴起，如arXiv、bioRxiv和SSRN，使研究人员上传其手稿变得比以往任何时候都容易。这一转变不仅加速了知识的传播，还为作者提供了在将其作品提交给期刊之前获得同行反馈的机会。从本质上讲，preprints作为一种开放科学的形式，促进了研究人员之间的透明度和合作。preprints的一个关键优势是它们可以帮助确定特定发现的优先权。当研究人员将其手稿作为preprint上传时，他们实际上是对其发现提出主张，这在竞争激烈的领域中尤为重要，因为多个团队可能在研究相似的问题。此外，preprints可以吸引媒体和公众的关注，可能导致更多的资金机会或合作。然而，preprints的兴起并非没有挑战。由于preprints未经同行评审，因此存在传播未经验证或有缺陷的研究的风险。这引发了对错误信息潜在传播的担忧，尤其是在医学和公共卫生等领域。例如，在COVID-19大流行期间，几篇发布的preprints包含不准确的数据或未经支持的声明，导致公众和决策者的困惑和担忧。因此，读者在阅读preprints时必须保持批判性思维，理解这些文献尚未经过专家的严格评估。此外，一些研究人员担心preprints的普及可能影响传统出版模式。期刊通常被视为质量的把关人，而对preprints的日益依赖可能会削弱同行评审的感知价值。尽管如此，许多期刊现在鼓励作者在正式提交时提交他们的preprints，认识到快速传播研究的重要性。总之，preprints代表了科学研究共享和评估方式的重大转变。它们提供了许多好处，包括更快的发现传播、增加的合作以及对发现的优先权的确立。然而，与preprints相关的挑战突显了对尚未经过同行评审的研究进行仔细考虑和批判性评估的必要性。随着学术界不断适应这一新范式，preprints的角色无疑会不断发展，塑造科学传播和合作的未来。