adjudication

简明释义

英[əˌdʒuːdɪˈkeɪʃn]美[əˌdʒuːdɪˈkeɪʃn]

n. 裁定；判决；破产之宣告

复 数 a d j u d i c a t i o n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Must pass the agreement notarization above all, when necessary judicatory adjudication.

首先必须将协议经过公证，必要时司法裁决。

2.Does the adjudication supervision procedure of our country belong to the retrial systems of continental law system?

那我国的审判监督程序是否就是大陆法系国家的再审制度呢？

3.The past court house makes above adjudication.

故法院作出前述判决。

4.The next to appear was the Court of Common Pleas, which was basically a court for the adjudication of civil disputes between individuals.

随后出现的是普通诉讼法院，开始的时候它是审判私人之间民事纠纷的法院。

5.The belonging of arbitrating civil preserving adjudication is the prime problem in the connection of arbitration and civil preservation.

仲裁民事保全裁定权归属问题是仲裁与民事保全衔接所面临的首要问题。

6.In England and Wales today this covers the process of legislation, adjudication and possibly custom.

在今天的英格兰和威尔士，这涵盖了立法过程、司法判决，可能还有习惯。

7.The court's decision was based on a thorough process of adjudication.

法庭的决定是基于一个全面的裁决过程。

8.After a lengthy adjudication, the judge ruled in favor of the plaintiff.

经过漫长的裁决，法官裁定原告胜诉。

9.The arbitration process involves adjudication by a neutral third party.

仲裁过程涉及由中立第三方进行裁决。

10.In cases of conflict, adjudication can help resolve issues fairly.

在冲突的情况下，裁决可以帮助公平地解决问题。

11.The adjudication of the dispute took several months to complete.

该争议的裁决花费了几个月的时间才能完成。

作文

In the realm of law, the term adjudication refers to the legal process by which a judge or an arbitrator makes a formal judgment or decision about a dispute. This process is crucial in ensuring that justice is served and that disputes are resolved in a fair manner. The significance of adjudication can be observed in various legal contexts, including civil, criminal, and administrative cases. It serves as a mechanism through which conflicting parties can seek resolution and obtain a binding decision that they must adhere to.The process of adjudication typically begins when one party files a complaint against another, initiating a legal proceeding. This complaint outlines the grievances and the relief sought. Following this, the parties engage in a series of pre-trial activities, including discovery, where they exchange evidence and information relevant to the case. This phase is critical as it allows both parties to prepare their arguments and gather the necessary evidence to support their claims.Once the pre-trial phase is complete, the case proceeds to the hearing stage. During this stage, both parties present their evidence and arguments before the adjudicator, who may be a judge or an arbitrator. The adjudicator listens to the testimonies, examines the evidence, and considers the legal arguments presented by both sides. After careful consideration, the adjudicator issues a ruling, which constitutes the adjudication of the case.The outcome of adjudication can have significant implications for the parties involved. A favorable ruling for one party may result in monetary compensation, injunctions, or other forms of relief, while an unfavorable ruling can lead to losses and the need to comply with the adjudicator's decision. Therefore, the stakes in the process of adjudication are often high, motivating parties to thoroughly prepare their cases and seek competent legal representation.Moreover, adjudication plays a pivotal role in upholding the rule of law and maintaining social order. It provides a structured forum for resolving disputes, thereby reducing the potential for personal vendettas and self-help measures that could lead to chaos. By relying on a neutral third party to make decisions, the process fosters trust in the legal system and promotes adherence to the law.In addition to its importance in traditional court settings, adjudication is also prevalent in alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, such as arbitration and mediation. These methods offer parties a more flexible and often quicker means of resolving disputes outside of the courtroom. However, even in these informal settings, the principles of adjudication remain intact, as a neutral party is still tasked with evaluating the evidence and making a decision.In conclusion, adjudication is a fundamental concept in the legal system that ensures disputes are resolved in a fair and orderly manner. It encompasses a series of processes that allow parties to present their cases and receive a binding decision from an impartial adjudicator. The implications of adjudication extend beyond individual cases, as it upholds the rule of law and contributes to societal stability. Understanding adjudication is essential for anyone engaged in legal matters, as it is a cornerstone of the justice system that impacts countless lives every day.

在法律领域，术语adjudication指的是法官或仲裁员对争议作出正式判断或决定的法律程序。这个过程对于确保公正和以公平的方式解决争端至关重要。adjudication的重要性可以在各种法律背景中观察到，包括民事、刑事和行政案件。它作为一种机制，使冲突各方能够寻求解决并获得必须遵守的具有约束力的决定。adjudication的过程通常始于一方对另一方提起诉讼，启动法律程序。该诉状概述了不满和所寻求的救济。随后，各方参与一系列审前活动，包括证据交换，即发现阶段，在此阶段，他们交换与案件相关的证据和信息。这个阶段至关重要，因为它允许双方准备论点并收集必要的证据来支持其主张。一旦审前阶段完成，案件进入听证阶段。在这一阶段，双方在裁决者面前呈现他们的证据和论点，裁决者可能是法官或仲裁员。裁决者倾听证词，审查证据，并考虑双方提出的法律论点。在仔细考虑后，裁决者发布裁决，这构成了案件的adjudication。adjudication的结果对相关各方可能产生重大影响。一方的有利裁决可能导致金钱赔偿、禁令或其他形式的救济，而不利裁决则可能导致损失，并需要遵守裁决者的决定。因此，在adjudication过程中，利益往往很高，促使各方充分准备案件并寻求合格的法律代理。此外，adjudication在维护法治和社会秩序方面发挥着关键作用。它提供了一个结构化的争端解决论坛，从而减少了可能导致混乱的个人复仇和自助措施。通过依靠中立的第三方做出决定，该过程促进了对法律制度的信任，并推动遵守法律。除了在传统法庭环境中的重要性外，adjudication还普遍存在于替代争端解决机制中，例如仲裁和调解。这些方法为各方提供了一种更灵活且通常更快速的方式来在法庭外解决争端。然而，即使在这些非正式环境中，adjudication的原则仍然存在，因为中立方仍然负责评估证据并做出决定。总之，adjudication是法律体系中的一个基本概念，确保争端以公平和有序的方式解决。它包含一系列程序，使各方能够呈现其案件并从公正的裁决者那里获得具有约束力的决定。adjudication的影响超越了个案，因为它维护法治并有助于社会稳定。理解adjudication对任何参与法律事务的人来说都是至关重要的，因为它是影响无数人生活的司法系统的基石。