coverture

简明释义

英[ˈkʌvətʃə(r)]美[ˈkʌvərtʃər]

n. 保护；覆盖；掩护；有夫之妇的法律身分

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Creamy and rich Belgian coverture chocolate and white chocolate filling. Absolutely a luscious, luxurious, sinfully rich chocolate lover's dream.

充满了柔滑的浓比利时巧克力和白巧克力，绝对是巧克力爱好者梦寐以求的一款香甜、丰富的蛋糕。

2.Creamy and rich Belgian coverture chocolate and white chocolate filling. Absolutely a luscious, luxurious, sinfully rich chocolate lover's dream.

充满了柔滑的浓比利时巧克力和白巧克力，绝对是巧克力爱好者梦寐以求的一款香甜、丰富的蛋糕。

3.They took action with police's coverture.

他们在警方的掩护下采取了行动。

4.Wings - Celebrity, sometimes protection or coverture.

翅膀-名望，有时表示保护或掩护。

5.The impact of coverture on women's rights was profound and lasted for centuries.

coverture对女性权利的影响深远，并持续了几个世纪。

6.The doctrine of coverture meant that married women could not own property in their own name.

婚姻法则coverture意味着已婚女性不能以自己的名义拥有财产。

7.Legal reforms gradually dismantled the system of coverture in the 20th century.

法律改革逐渐在20世纪拆除了coverture制度。

8.Many feminist movements have sought to abolish the principles of coverture to promote gender equality.

许多女权运动寻求废除coverture的原则，以促进性别平等。

9.In the 19th century, a woman's legal identity was often subsumed under her husband's due to coverture.

在19世纪，由于coverture，女性的法律身份常常被她丈夫所吞没。

作文

The concept of coverture has historical significance, particularly in the context of marriage and women's rights. Originating from English common law, coverture refers to the legal doctrine whereby a married woman's legal rights and obligations were subsumed by those of her husband. This meant that once a woman entered into marriage, she essentially lost her individual legal identity. The husband became the 'feme sole' or the sole legal entity in the eyes of the law, while the wife was considered a 'feme covert,' effectively rendering her incapable of owning property, entering contracts, or making legal decisions independently.The implications of coverture were profound and far-reaching. Women were often left vulnerable, as they had no control over their own finances or assets. For instance, if a woman inherited property, it would typically be transferred to her husband, who would then manage it without her input. This legal framework reinforced the notion of male dominance within the household and society at large. It institutionalized gender inequality, creating barriers for women seeking autonomy and independence.As society evolved, so did attitudes towards coverture. The women's rights movement of the 19th and early 20th centuries challenged these outdated legal norms. Activists fought tirelessly to reform laws that oppressed women, advocating for their right to own property, vote, and participate fully in public life. Landmark legislation, such as the Married Women's Property Acts in various jurisdictions, began to dismantle the rigid structures of coverture. These acts allowed married women to retain ownership of their property and enter contracts, marking a significant shift towards gender equality.Despite these advancements, the legacy of coverture lingers in contemporary discussions about gender and law. Many argue that the historical context of coverture continues to influence societal perceptions of women's roles, both in the family and the workforce. For example, women are still often expected to prioritize family responsibilities over career aspirations, a remnant of the traditional views that coverture perpetuated.Furthermore, the economic disparities between men and women can also be traced back to the restrictions imposed by coverture. Women today still face challenges in achieving equal pay and representation in leadership positions. The historical denial of financial autonomy has contributed to a cycle of dependence that many women continue to experience.In conclusion, understanding the concept of coverture is essential for recognizing the historical injustices faced by women and the ongoing struggles for equality. While significant progress has been made since the days when coverture dictated the legal status of married women, the fight for true gender equality is far from over. By examining the roots of these issues, we can better appreciate the importance of continued advocacy and reform in the pursuit of a more equitable society. The legacy of coverture serves as a reminder of the work that still needs to be done to ensure that all individuals, regardless of gender, can enjoy the full spectrum of rights and freedoms.

‘coverture’一词具有历史意义，特别是在婚姻和女性权利的背景下。源于英国普通法，‘coverture’指的是一种法律原则，在这种原则下，已婚女性的法律权利和义务被其丈夫所取代。这意味着，一旦女性进入婚姻，她基本上失去了个人法律身份。丈夫成为法律眼中的‘feme sole’或唯一法律实体，而妻子则被视为‘feme covert’，这使得她无法独立拥有财产、签订合同或做出法律决定。‘coverture’的影响深远而深刻。女性常常处于脆弱的境地，因为她们无法控制自己的财务或资产。例如，如果一位女性继承了财产，通常会转给她的丈夫，由他管理，而不需要她的意见。这一法律框架强化了家庭和社会中男性的主导地位，制度化了性别不平等，为女性寻求自主和独立设置了障碍。随着社会的发展，人们对‘coverture’的态度也发生了变化。19世纪和20世纪初的女性权利运动挑战了这些过时的法律规范。活动家们不懈努力，改革压迫女性的法律，倡导她们拥有财产、投票和全面参与公共生活的权利。在各个司法管辖区，诸如已婚女性财产法这样的里程碑式立法开始拆解‘coverture’的严格结构。这些法律允许已婚女性保留对其财产的所有权并签订合同，标志着朝向性别平等的重要转变。尽管取得了这些进展，‘coverture’的遗产仍在当代关于性别与法律的讨论中存在。许多人认为，‘coverture’的历史背景继续影响社会对女性角色的看法，无论是在家庭还是职场。例如，女性仍然常常被期望优先考虑家庭责任而非职业抱负，这是传统观念对‘coverture’的延续。此外，男女之间的经济差距也可以追溯到‘coverture’施加的限制。今天，女性在实现同工同酬和领导职位代表性方面仍面临挑战。历史上对财务自主权的否定导致了许多女性继续经历的依赖循环。总之，理解‘coverture’这一概念对于认识女性所面临的历史不公正以及争取平等的持续斗争至关重要。尽管自‘coverture’支配已婚女性法律地位的时代以来已经取得了显著进展，但真正的性别平等之战仍未结束。通过审视这些问题的根源，我们可以更好地欣赏继续倡导和改革在追求更公平社会中的重要性。‘coverture’的遗产提醒我们，确保所有人，无论性别如何，都能享有全面的权利和自由，仍需付出努力。