generalities

简明释义

英[ˌdʒɛnəˈrælɪtiz]美[ˌdʒɛnəˈrælɪtiz]

n. 概论；总类（generality 的复数）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Glass. Safety glasses for glazing. Generalities. Terminology.

玻璃。窗用安全玻璃。概论。术语。

2.Speaking first in generalities, suppose we have a collection of atoms, as for example, in a solid, gas or liquid.

首先作一般的介绍。假定有大量的原子处在固体、气体或液体中。

3.We also tend to use more generalities to avoid getting trapped by specific detail.

我们也趋向用更多概括性话语来避免纠缠于具体细节。

4.His speeches are generalities from Poor Richard's Almanac.

他的演讲是出自老皇历的老生常谈。

5.You would rather receive two specific compliments than twenty vague generalities.

你宁可接受两次明确的赞许，胜过二十次含糊笼统的好评。

6.Generalities should be avoided in it, that is, it should be specific.

普通性如果被避免在它，那是它应该是具体的。

7.My hands were tied. I could not talk in specifics or generalities.

我的手脚给束缚住了。我既不能具体地谈，也不能笼统地说。

8.The range of problems is so large, that it is impossible to offer more than generalities as advise.

这些问题的范围如此之广，因此只能给予一些笼统的建议。

9.Politicians often speak in generalities to appeal to a broader audience.

政治家们常常用概括性的语言来吸引更广泛的听众。

10.Her speech was full of generalities, lacking any real substance or depth.

她的演讲充满了概括性的内容，缺乏任何实质性或深度。

11.The teacher warned us not to write essays filled with generalities but to provide concrete examples instead.

老师警告我们不要写充满概括性内容的论文，而要提供具体的例子。

12.In the meeting, we discussed many generalities about the project, but we need to focus on specific details.

在会议上，我们讨论了很多关于项目的概括性内容，但我们需要关注具体细节。

13.When discussing the issue, we should avoid generalities and address the facts.

在讨论这个问题时，我们应该避免概括性的说法，直接针对事实。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, it is easy to fall into the trap of making sweeping statements or relying on generalities when discussing complex issues. These generalities often oversimplify reality and can lead to misunderstandings. For instance, when people say that "all politicians are corrupt," they are using a generality that fails to recognize the diversity and complexity within the political landscape. Such statements can alienate individuals who may be genuinely trying to serve their communities. Understanding the dangers of generalities is crucial in fostering meaningful dialogue. When we resort to these broad statements, we neglect the nuances that define individual experiences and perspectives. This is particularly evident in discussions surrounding social issues such as race, gender, and economic status. For example, saying that "women are overly emotional" is not only a generality but also a stereotype that undermines the varied emotional responses of women across different cultures and situations.Moreover, generalities can perpetuate biases and reinforce negative stereotypes. When we categorize groups of people based on limited information, we risk creating an environment of prejudice. This is evident in media portrayals that often rely on generalities to depict certain communities, leading to misconceptions and a lack of understanding. It is essential to challenge these generalities and seek out the stories and experiences that provide a fuller picture of reality.To combat the use of generalities, we must strive for specificity and accuracy in our language. Instead of saying, "young people today are lazy," we could specify, "some young people may struggle with motivation due to economic pressures." This shift in language not only promotes a more nuanced understanding but also encourages empathy and connection among individuals. Furthermore, engaging with diverse perspectives can help dismantle generalities. By listening to the voices of those who have been marginalized or misrepresented, we can gain insight into the complexities that exist within any group. This practice fosters an environment where people feel heard and understood, which is vital for building strong communities. In conclusion, while generalities may offer a convenient way to communicate ideas, they often fall short of capturing the intricacies of human experience. By being mindful of our language and striving for specificity, we can move beyond simplistic narratives and engage in more meaningful conversations. Embracing the complexity of individual experiences not only enriches our understanding of the world but also helps us create a more inclusive society. Therefore, it is imperative that we recognize and challenge the use of generalities in our discourse, allowing for a deeper exploration of the issues that matter most.

在当今快节奏的世界中，容易陷入使用笼统陈述或依赖于generalities来讨论复杂问题的陷阱。这些generalities往往简化现实，并可能导致误解。例如，当人们说“所有政治家都是腐败的”时，他们使用的是一种generality，这未能认识到政治格局中的多样性和复杂性。这种说法可能使那些真正试图为社区服务的人感到疏远。理解generalities的危险对于促进有意义的对话至关重要。当我们诉诸于这些宽泛的陈述时，我们忽视了定义个人经历和观点的细微差别。这在围绕种族、性别和经济地位等社会问题的讨论中尤为明显。例如，说“女性过于情绪化”不仅是一种generality，而且还是一种刻板印象，削弱了不同文化和情境中女性的多样化情感反应。此外，generalities可能会助长偏见并强化负面刻板印象。当我们根据有限的信息对人群进行分类时，我们冒着创造出偏见环境的风险。这在媒体的描绘中尤其明显，媒体常常依赖于generalities来描绘某些社区，从而导致误解和缺乏理解。挑战这些generalities，寻求提供更全面现实图景的故事和经历是至关重要的。为了对抗generalities的使用，我们必须努力在语言中追求具体性和准确性。与其说“如今的年轻人懒惰”，不如具体说明“一些年轻人可能因经济压力而难以激励自己”。这种语言的转变不仅促进了更细致的理解，还鼓励了个体之间的同理心和联系。此外，接触多样的观点可以帮助拆解generalities。通过倾听那些被边缘化或被误解的声音，我们可以深入了解任何群体内部存在的复杂性。这种做法促进了一个人们感到被倾听和理解的环境，这对于建立强大的社区至关重要。总之，虽然generalities可能提供了一种方便的方式来传达思想，但它们往往无法捕捉人类经验的复杂性。通过关注我们的语言并追求具体性，我们可以超越简单的叙述，参与更有意义的对话。接受个体经历的复杂性不仅丰富了我们对世界的理解，也帮助我们创造一个更具包容性的社会。因此，我们必须认识到并挑战我们话语中generalities的使用，以便更深刻地探索最重要的问题。