academicism

简明释义

英[ˌækəˈdemɪsɪzəm]美[ˌækəˈdemɪsɪzəm]

n. 形成主义；艺术院的作风

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.High professional school's cultural construction has the trend of academicism: they refer to comprehensive universities in their purposes enactment, majors setting, and curriculums arrangement.

同时高职校学校文化建设有学术化倾向，在目标定位、专业设置、课程安排方面也比照综合性大学来建设；

2.The possibility of something entirely new, the expectation of anti-academicism, flushed into the sclerotic system.

全新的可能性，反学院主义的期待，冲入了僵化的体系。

3.High professional school's cultural construction has the trend of academicism: they refer to comprehensive universities in their purposes enactment, majors setting, and curriculums arrangement.

同时高职校学校文化建设有学术化倾向，在目标定位、专业设置、课程安排方面也比照综合性大学来建设；

4.The professor criticized the paper for its excessive academicism, which made it difficult to read.

教授批评这篇论文过于学术化，使得阅读起来很困难。

5.The book was praised for its accessibility, contrasting with the typical academicism of its genre.

这本书因其易读性而受到赞扬，与其类型通常的学术化形成对比。

6.In an effort to avoid academicism, the lecturer used more relatable examples.

为了避免学术化，讲师使用了更易于理解的例子。

7.Her writing was filled with academicism, which alienated her audience.

她的写作充满了学术化，使得她的听众感到疏远。

8.Many students struggle with academicism when trying to express their ideas clearly.

许多学生在尝试清晰表达自己的想法时，会与学术化作斗争。

作文

In the realm of education and intellectual discourse, the term academicism refers to a style of thought and practice that emphasizes formalism, adherence to established norms, and often a detachment from practical realities. This concept can be both a strength and a weakness in academic environments. On one hand, academicism promotes rigor, discipline, and a structured approach to learning. It encourages students and scholars to engage deeply with existing literature, theories, and methodologies, fostering a sense of respect for the intellectual traditions that have shaped their fields. For instance, in disciplines such as philosophy and literature, academicism can lead to profound analyses that are rooted in historical context and critical frameworks.However, the downside of academicism is its potential to create a barrier between academia and the outside world. When scholars become too entrenched in theoretical debates or overly focused on formal structures, they risk losing sight of the practical applications of their work. This disconnect can result in research that feels irrelevant to real-world issues or that fails to engage with broader societal concerns. For example, while a detailed analysis of a literary text may be intellectually stimulating, it may not address pressing social issues that could benefit from scholarly attention.Moreover, academicism can also foster elitism within academic circles. The emphasis on specialized knowledge and technical jargon can alienate those outside the academic community, including practitioners, policymakers, and the general public. This can lead to a situation where valuable insights remain confined within academic journals, inaccessible to those who could benefit from them. As a result, the impact of scholarly work may be diminished, as it becomes increasingly disconnected from the very audiences it seeks to inform or influence.To counteract the pitfalls of academicism, many educators and scholars advocate for a more integrated approach to learning and research. This involves encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration, promoting public scholarship, and emphasizing the importance of applying theoretical insights to practical challenges. By bridging the gap between theory and practice, scholars can ensure that their work remains relevant and impactful.In conclusion, while academicism plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity and rigor of academic inquiry, it is essential to remain aware of its limitations. Balancing the need for formalism with a commitment to real-world relevance can enhance the value of academic work. Ultimately, the goal should be to foster a vibrant intellectual community that values both rigorous scholarship and meaningful engagement with the world beyond the classroom. By doing so, we can harness the strengths of academicism while mitigating its drawbacks, leading to a richer and more inclusive academic landscape.

在教育和知识讨论的领域，术语academicism指的是一种强调形式主义、遵循既定规范，并且往往与实际现实脱节的思想和实践风格。这个概念在学术环境中既可以是优点，也可以是缺点。一方面，academicism促进了严谨性、纪律性和结构化的学习方法。它鼓励学生和学者深入参与现有文献、理论和方法论，培养对塑造其领域的知识传统的尊重。例如，在哲学和文学等学科中，academicism可以导致深刻的分析，这些分析根植于历史背景和批判框架。然而，academicism的缺点在于它可能会在学术界和外部世界之间造成障碍。当学者过于沉迷于理论辩论或过于关注形式结构时，他们可能会失去对其工作的实际应用的关注。这种脱节可能导致研究结果感觉与现实世界问题无关，或者未能与更广泛的社会关注进行互动。例如，虽然对文学文本的详细分析可能在智力上令人兴奋，但它可能无法解决那些需要学术关注的紧迫社会问题。此外，academicism还可能在学术圈内滋生精英主义。对专业知识和技术术语的强调可能会使外部学术社区的人感到疏远，包括从业者、政策制定者和普通公众。这可能导致一种情况，即有价值的见解被困在学术期刊中，无法为那些能够从中受益的人所获取。因此，学术工作的影响可能会减弱，因为它与其寻求告知或影响的观众之间的联系日益疏远。为了抵消academicism的缺陷，许多教育工作者和学者倡导一种更为综合的学习和研究方法。这涉及到鼓励跨学科合作，促进公共学术研究，以及强调将理论见解应用于实际挑战的重要性。通过弥合理论与实践之间的差距，学者们可以确保他们的工作保持相关性和影响力。总之，尽管academicism在维护学术探究的完整性和严谨性方面发挥着重要作用，但意识到其局限性也是至关重要的。在追求形式主义的同时，致力于与现实世界的相关性可以增强学术工作的价值。最终，目标应该是培养一个充满活力的知识共同体，既重视严谨的学术研究，又重视与课堂之外世界的有意义互动。通过这样做，我们可以利用academicism的优势，同时减轻其缺点，从而带来更加丰富和包容的学术环境。