secondary boycott

简明释义

间接抵制

英英释义

例句

1.By organizing a secondary boycott, activists aimed to disrupt the operations of the main company involved in the labor dispute.

通过组织次级抵制，活动人士旨在干扰涉及劳动争议的主要公司的运营。

2.The union decided to initiate a secondary boycott on the suppliers of the company, hoping to increase pressure for better working conditions.

工会决定对公司的供应商发起次级抵制，希望加大对改善工作条件的压力。

3.The environmental group called for a secondary boycott of businesses that supported the controversial pipeline project.

环保组织呼吁对支持有争议的管道项目的企业进行次级抵制。

4.The secondary boycott against the retailer was intended to show solidarity with the striking workers at the manufacturer.

对零售商的次级抵制旨在向制造商的罢工工人表示团结。

5.Legal challenges arose when the company claimed that the secondary boycott violated trade regulations.

当公司声称次级抵制违反贸易法规时，法律挑战随之而来。

作文

In the realm of labor relations and economic activism, the term secondary boycott refers to a situation where a union or group of workers refuses to do business with a company that is associated with another company being boycotted. This strategy is often employed to exert pressure on an employer by targeting their suppliers, customers, or other business partners, thereby amplifying the impact of the primary boycott. The concept of a secondary boycott is crucial in understanding the dynamics of collective bargaining and the broader implications of labor movements.To illustrate, consider a scenario where workers at a manufacturing plant are engaged in a primary strike against their employer due to unfair labor practices. In an effort to strengthen their position, they might call for a secondary boycott against a retailer that sells products from the manufacturing plant. By encouraging consumers to avoid purchasing from this retailer, the striking workers aim to create economic pressure that could compel the manufacturer to negotiate more favorably.However, the legality of secondary boycotts can be contentious. In some jurisdictions, such actions may be protected under labor laws, while in others, they may be deemed illegal. For example, in the United States, the National Labor Relations Act protects certain types of secondary boycotts, allowing unions to organize such actions under specific conditions. Nevertheless, these laws can vary significantly from one region to another, leading to complex legal battles over the right to engage in secondary boycotts.The ethical implications of secondary boycotts also warrant discussion. Proponents argue that they are a legitimate form of protest that empowers workers and consumers to stand against corporate malfeasance. They believe that when one company mistreats its employees, it is the responsibility of the community to take action against not just the offending company but also those who support it indirectly. On the other hand, critics contend that secondary boycotts can lead to unintended consequences, such as harming innocent businesses that have no direct involvement in the labor dispute.Furthermore, the effectiveness of secondary boycotts can vary based on public perception and media coverage. A well-publicized boycott can rally community support and draw attention to the issues at stake, potentially leading to a resolution that benefits the workers involved. Conversely, if the public does not resonate with the cause or if the boycott is poorly organized, it can fizzle out without achieving its goals.In conclusion, the concept of secondary boycott plays a significant role in labor relations and social justice movements. It serves as a powerful tool for workers to leverage economic pressure against companies that exploit or mistreat them. While there are legal and ethical considerations surrounding the practice, the potential for secondary boycotts to effect change remains a critical aspect of modern activism. Understanding the complexities of this strategy can help individuals and organizations navigate the challenges of advocating for labor rights and fair treatment in the workplace.

在劳动关系和经济活动的领域中，术语secondary boycott指的是工会或工人团体拒绝与与被抵制公司有关联的公司进行商业往来的情况。这种策略通常用于通过针对雇主的供应商、客户或其他商业伙伴来施加压力，从而扩大主要抵制的影响。理解secondary boycott的概念对于理解集体谈判的动态及劳动运动的更广泛影响至关重要。例如，考虑一个场景，制造厂的工人因不公平的劳动实践而进行主要罢工。为了加强他们的立场，他们可能会呼吁对销售该制造厂产品的零售商进行secondary boycott。通过鼓励消费者避免向该零售商购买商品，罢工工人旨在创造经济压力，以促使制造商进行更有利的谈判。然而，secondary boycott的合法性可能存在争议。在某些司法管辖区，这种行为可能受到劳动法的保护，而在其他地区，则可能被视为非法。例如，在美国，《国家劳动关系法》保护某些类型的次级抵制，允许工会在特定条件下组织此类行动。然而，这些法律在不同地区之间可能差异显著，导致关于进行secondary boycotts权利的复杂法律斗争。secondary boycotts的伦理含义也值得讨论。支持者认为，这是一种合法的抗议形式，使工人和消费者能够反对企业的不当行为。他们认为，当一家公司虐待其员工时，社区有责任对不仅是惩罚违规公司，还要惩罚那些间接支持它的公司。另一方面，批评者认为，secondary boycotts可能导致意想不到的后果，例如伤害那些在劳动争议中没有直接参与的无辜企业。此外，secondary boycotts的有效性可能根据公众认知和媒体报道而有所不同。一个被广泛宣传的抵制可以团结社区支持并引起对问题的关注，可能导致对工人有利的解决方案。相反，如果公众对这一事业没有共鸣，或者抵制组织不善，它可能会无果而终，无法实现目标。总之，secondary boycott的概念在劳动关系和社会正义运动中发挥着重要作用。它作为工人利用经济压力对抗剥削或虐待他们的公司的强大工具。尽管围绕这一做法存在法律和伦理考虑，但secondary boycotts对变革的潜力仍然是现代活动的重要方面。理解这一策略的复杂性可以帮助个人和组织应对倡导劳动权利和工作场所公正待遇的挑战。