regessive tax

简明释义

递减税

英英释义

例句

1.In some states, the gas tax is considered a regressive tax 累退税 since lower-income families spend a higher proportion of their income on fuel.

在某些州，汽油税被视为一种累退税 累退税，因为低收入家庭在燃料上的支出占其收入的比例更高。

2.The impact of regressive taxes 累退税 can disproportionately affect low-income households, making it a contentious issue in policy discussions.

累退税 累退税的影响可能会对低收入家庭产生不成比例的影响，使其成为政策讨论中的争议问题。

3.Critics of the flat tax system claim it is inherently a regressive tax 累退税 as it does not account for income disparities.

平税制度的批评者声称，它本质上是一种累退税 累退税，因为它没有考虑收入差异。

4.Some economists suggest eliminating regressive taxes 累退税 to promote fairness in the tax system.

一些经济学家建议消除累退税 累退税以促进税制的公平性。

5.Many argue that a sales tax is a form of regressive tax 累退税 because it takes a larger percentage of income from low-income earners.

许多人认为销售税是一种累退税 累退税，因为它对低收入者的收入占比更大。

作文

Understanding the concept of regressive tax is crucial for comprehending how different tax systems impact various segments of society. A regressive tax is one where the tax rate decreases as the taxable amount increases, which means that lower-income individuals pay a higher percentage of their income compared to those with higher incomes. This type of tax system can lead to increased inequality and can disproportionately affect the poorer members of society.For example, sales taxes are often considered a form of regressive tax. When a person buys a product, they pay a set percentage of the price in tax. This means that someone with a lower income, who spends a larger portion of their earnings on necessities, ends up paying a higher percentage of their income in taxes than someone who is wealthier and can afford to save more. Thus, while the tax rate is the same for everyone, its impact is not uniform across different income levels.Another common example of regressive tax is excise taxes on goods such as tobacco and alcohol. These taxes can have a more significant effect on low-income individuals, who may spend a larger share of their income on these products compared to wealthier individuals. Consequently, while the intention behind such taxes might be to discourage unhealthy behaviors, they can inadvertently place a heavier financial burden on those who can least afford it.The implications of a regressive tax system extend beyond just individual finances; they can also influence broader economic trends. For instance, when low-income families are taxed more heavily relative to their income, they have less disposable income to spend on goods and services. This can lead to decreased demand in the economy, which can stifle growth and limit job creation. In contrast, a more equitable tax system that includes progressive elements—where higher earners pay a larger percentage—can stimulate economic activity by allowing lower-income individuals to spend more.Critics of regressive tax systems argue that they undermine social mobility and perpetuate cycles of poverty. When the tax burden disproportionately falls on those who are already struggling, it becomes increasingly difficult for them to improve their financial situation. Education, healthcare, and other essential services may become less accessible, further entrenching socioeconomic disparities.In conclusion, the understanding of regressive tax is vital for anyone looking to grasp the complexities of modern taxation. While such taxes may be appealing due to their simplicity and ease of collection, the long-term consequences can be detrimental to society. Policymakers must carefully consider the implications of their tax structures and strive to create a fairer system that promotes equity and supports all citizens, regardless of their economic standing. By doing so, we can work towards a more balanced and just society where everyone has the opportunity to thrive.

理解累退税的概念对于理解不同税制如何影响社会各个层面至关重要。累退税是指随着应纳税额的增加，税率降低，这意味着低收入个人支付的收入比例高于高收入者。这种税制可能导致不平等加剧，并对社会中较贫困的成员产生不成比例的影响。例如，销售税通常被视为一种累退税。当一个人购买产品时，他们需要支付一定比例的价格作为税款。这意味着收入较低的人，花费更多的收入在必需品上，最终以更高的比例支付税款，而富裕的人则能够节省更多。因此，虽然税率对每个人都是相同的，但其影响在不同收入水平之间并不均匀。另一个常见的累退税例子是对烟草和酒精等商品征收的消费税。这些税对低收入个人的影响可能更大，因为他们在这些产品上的支出占其收入的比例可能比富裕个体更多。因此，尽管这些税收的意图可能是为了抑制不健康的行为，但它们却可能无意中对那些最无法承受的人造成更大的经济负担。累退税制度的影响不仅限于个人财务，它们还可以影响更广泛的经济趋势。例如，当低收入家庭相对于其收入被征收更多税款时，他们可支配的收入减少，导致对商品和服务的需求下降。这可能导致经济增长乏力，限制就业创造。相比之下，包含进步性元素的更公平的税制——即高收入者支付更大比例的税款——可以通过让低收入个人有更多的支出能力来刺激经济活动。批评累退税制度的人认为，这些制度削弱了社会流动性，并延续了贫困循环。当税负不成比例地落在已经挣扎的人身上时，他们改善财务状况的难度就会越来越大。教育、医疗保健和其他基本服务的可及性可能降低，进一步加剧社会经济差距。总之，理解累退税对于任何希望掌握现代税收复杂性的人来说都是至关重要的。尽管这种税收由于其简单性和易于征收而受到青睐，但其长期后果可能对社会造成伤害。政策制定者必须仔细考虑其税制的影响，并努力创造一个更加公平的体系，促进平等，支持所有公民，无论其经济状况如何。通过这样做，我们可以朝着一个更平衡和公正的社会迈进，让每个人都有机会蓬勃发展。