poll tax

简明释义

人头税

英英释义

例句

1.Activists campaigned vigorously against the poll tax 人头税, arguing it disenfranchised the poor.

活动家们积极反对人头税 poll tax，认为这剥夺了穷人的投票权。

2.The government decided to abolish the poll tax 人头税 after widespread public outcry.

在广泛的公众抗议后，政府决定废除人头税 poll tax。

3.The history of the poll tax 人头税 in the U.S. reveals deep-rooted issues of inequality.

美国人头税 poll tax 的历史揭示了根深蒂固的不平等问题。

4.Many citizens protested against the unfair implementation of the poll tax 人头税 in their state.

许多公民抗议他们州内不公平的人头税 poll tax 实施。

5.In some states, the poll tax 人头税 was used as a means to limit voting access.

在一些州，人头税 poll tax 被用作限制投票权的手段。

作文

The concept of poll tax has significant historical implications, particularly in the context of voting rights and social justice. A poll tax is a fixed fee that individuals are required to pay in order to be eligible to vote in elections. This practice was prevalent in various parts of the world, especially in the United States, during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The introduction of the poll tax was often a strategy used to disenfranchise marginalized groups, particularly African Americans and poor white citizens. By imposing a financial barrier to voting, lawmakers aimed to maintain power structures that favored the wealthy and privileged.Historically, the poll tax was implemented as a means of controlling the electorate. Many states adopted this tax following the Reconstruction era, a period when African Americans gained significant political power. The poll tax served as a tool for white supremacists to suppress black voter turnout. In many cases, these taxes were prohibitively expensive for low-income individuals, effectively barring them from participating in the democratic process.The ramifications of the poll tax extended beyond mere financial burdens. It was emblematic of systemic racism and classism that permeated the political landscape. Activists fought against the poll tax, arguing that it violated the fundamental principle of equal access to the ballot box. Legal challenges culminated in the landmark Supreme Court case, Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections (1966), which ruled that the poll tax in state elections was unconstitutional. This decision marked a significant victory for civil rights advocates, reinforcing the notion that voting should be accessible to all citizens, regardless of their economic status.Despite its abolishment, the legacy of the poll tax continues to influence contemporary discussions about voting rights. The historical context of the poll tax serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggles faced by marginalized communities in securing their right to vote. Today, various forms of voter suppression persist, including strict voter ID laws and limited access to polling places, echoing the discriminatory practices of the past.In conclusion, understanding the poll tax is crucial for comprehending the broader narrative of voting rights in the United States. It highlights the intersection of race, class, and politics, illustrating how financial barriers can undermine democracy. As we reflect on the history of the poll tax, it is essential to remain vigilant against modern-day inequalities that threaten the integrity of our electoral system. Advocating for inclusive policies that ensure every citizen can participate in the democratic process is vital for upholding the principles of equality and justice. The fight against voter suppression must continue, drawing lessons from the past to create a more equitable future.

“投票税”的概念具有重要的历史意义，特别是在投票权和社会正义的背景下。“投票税”是一种固定费用，个人必须支付才能有资格在选举中投票。这种做法在世界各地，尤其是在美国，19世纪末到20世纪初期间非常普遍。“投票税”的引入通常是用来剥夺边缘化群体，特别是非裔美国人和贫困白人公民的选举权。通过对投票施加经济障碍，立法者旨在维持有利于富人和特权阶层的权力结构。历史上，“投票税”的实施是控制选民的一种手段。许多州在重建时代之后采用了这一税收制度，那是一个非裔美国人获得显著政治权力的时期。“投票税”成为白人至上主义者压制黑人选民投票率的工具。在许多情况下，这些税收对于低收入个人来说过于昂贵，有效地将他们排除在民主进程之外。“投票税”的影响超出了单纯的经济负担。它象征着渗透政治格局的系统性种族主义和阶级主义。活动人士反对“投票税”，认为这违反了平等进入投票箱的基本原则。法律挑战 culminated in the landmark Supreme Court case, Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections (1966)，该案裁定州选举中的“投票税”是违宪的。这一裁决标志着民权倡导者的重要胜利，强化了投票应对所有公民开放的理念，无论其经济状况如何。尽管“投票税”已被废除，但其遗产继续影响当代关于投票权的讨论。“投票税”的历史背景提醒我们，在确保边缘化社区投票权方面面临的持续斗争。如今，各种形式的选民压制仍然存在，包括严格的选民身份证法和有限的投票地点，回响着过去的歧视性做法。总之，理解“投票税”对于理解美国投票权的更广泛叙事至关重要。它突显了种族、阶级和政治的交集，说明经济障碍如何削弱民主。回顾“投票税”的历史，保持对现代不平等现象的警惕，以威胁我们选举制度的完整性。倡导确保每位公民都能参与民主过程的包容性政策，对于维护平等和正义的原则至关重要。反对选民压制的斗争必须继续，从过去吸取教训，以创造一个更加公平的未来。