tenuously
简明释义
adv. 微弱地;不确定地
英英释义
In a manner that is weak or insubstantial; lacking a strong basis or connection. | 以一种脆弱或无实质的方式;缺乏强有力的基础或联系。 |
单词用法
脆弱地连接 | |
微弱相关 | |
牵强地辩论 | |
保持脆弱的立场 |
同义词
虚弱地 | 这个论点的证据支持很虚弱。 | ||
稍微地 | 她稍微坚持这个想法,但并不确信。 | ||
松散地 | The connection between the two theories is loosely established. | 这两个理论之间的联系建立得很松散。 | |
脆弱地 | 他对这个主题的掌握是脆弱的。 |
反义词
牢固地 | The agreement was firmly established between the two parties. | 该协议在双方之间牢固地建立。 | |
强烈地 | 她强烈相信教育的重要性。 | ||
稳固地 | 这个基础建得稳固,以抵御地震。 |
例句
1.But they're held together tenuously, only by our constant activity, busy bees maintaining the cells of our hive.
然而这些思想只有通过我们不断的活动才能聚到一起。勤劳的蜜蜂才能保证我们蜂巢里的蜂房。
2.He kept in contact with her, if only very tenuously and intermittently.
他同她保持着联系,尽管只是微弱的时断时续的联系。
3.Eg. These objectives should not extend tenuously to preserving cultural traditions.
不应该空泛地把这些目标计划扩展到保护文化传统。
4.Only tenuously linked to any civilian institution, they are above the law and sign off on virtually all big decisions.
只要与任何文人机关扯上一点关连,他们的地位就高于法律并实际上签署所有重大决定。
5.Also like its predecessors, "Blood's a Rover" features three protagonists tenuously connected to law enforcement.
与前两部同样类似,《血迹蔓延》特点是有三个主人公,他们都与执法有着不可分割的联系。
6.Only tenuously linked to any civilian institution, they are above the law and sign off on virtually all big decisions.
只要与任何文人机关扯上一点关连,他们的地位就高于法律并实际上签署所有重大决定。
7.Their friendship was tenuously 脆弱地 maintained after the argument.
在争吵之后,他们的友谊变得tenuously 脆弱地维持。
8.The connection between the two theories was tenuously 微弱地 established, leaving many questions unanswered.
这两个理论之间的联系是tenuously 微弱地建立的,留下了许多未解的问题。
9.He held onto his job tenuously 勉强地, knowing that layoffs were imminent.
他tenuously 勉强地保持着他的工作,因为他知道裁员即将来临。
10.The evidence was tenuously 微弱地 linked to the suspect, making it difficult to prove guilt.
证据与嫌疑犯的联系是tenuously 微弱地,这使得证明其有罪变得困难。
11.The team’s chances of winning were tenuously 岌岌可危地 based on their recent performance.
该队获胜的机会是tenuously 岌岌可危地基于他们最近的表现。
作文
In the realm of scientific research, the importance of establishing strong connections between theories and empirical evidence cannot be overstated. However, there are instances where these connections are made tenuously, leading to conclusions that may not be as robust as they appear. When researchers present their findings, they often rely on a framework of existing literature to support their claims. Yet, if the links between their work and previous studies are established only tenuously, it raises questions about the validity of their results. For example, in the field of psychology, a study might suggest a correlation between two variables based on limited data or anecdotal evidence. Such a connection, if made tenuously, can mislead both the academic community and the public, potentially resulting in misguided policies or practices.Furthermore, the media often plays a significant role in how scientific findings are communicated to the public. Journalists may take complex studies and simplify them into catchy headlines, but this process can sometimes strip away the nuances of the research. If the original study was based on a tenuously established hypothesis, the media's portrayal can amplify misunderstandings. For instance, a headline claiming 'New Study Proves Diet X Causes Weight Loss' may not accurately reflect the study's conclusions, especially if the relationship was established tenuously with minimal evidence.The implications of tenuously drawn conclusions extend beyond academia and journalism; they can affect policy-making and public perception. Policymakers often rely on research to inform their decisions, but if the underlying studies are based on tenuously connected data, the resulting policies may be flawed. This is particularly concerning in areas such as public health, where decisions based on shaky evidence can impact millions of lives. Therefore, it is crucial for both researchers and journalists to critically assess the strength of the connections they make and communicate the degree of certainty associated with their findings.Moreover, the responsibility also lies with the audience to approach scientific claims with a critical mindset. In an age where information is readily available, it is essential for individuals to discern between well-supported research and claims that are made tenuously. Engaging with science requires a degree of skepticism and an understanding that not all studies are created equal. Readers should consider the methodology, sample size, and the context in which the research was conducted before accepting conclusions at face value.In conclusion, while the pursuit of knowledge is a noble endeavor, it is vital to recognize when conclusions are drawn tenuously. By fostering a culture of rigorous scrutiny in research and responsible communication in media, we can ensure that the information disseminated to the public is reliable and valid. Only then can we hope to build a society that makes informed decisions based on sound evidence rather than tenuous connections. The challenge lies not just in conducting research but in ensuring that the connections we draw are solid and well-founded, paving the way for advancements that genuinely benefit humanity.
在科学研究的领域中,建立理论与实证证据之间的强连接的重要性不容小觑。然而,有时这些连接是以微弱的方式建立的,导致结论可能并不像看起来那么稳固。当研究人员展示他们的发现时,他们通常依赖现有文献的框架来支持他们的主张。然而,如果他们的工作与先前研究之间的联系仅是微弱的,这就会引发对结果有效性的质疑。例如,在心理学领域,一项研究可能基于有限的数据或轶事证据来建议两个变量之间的相关性。如果这种联系是微弱的,可能会误导学术界和公众,最终导致错误的政策或做法。此外,媒体在科学发现如何传达给公众方面往往扮演着重要角色。记者可能会将复杂的研究简化为引人注目的标题,但这个过程有时会剥夺研究的细微差别。如果原始研究是基于微弱的假设,那么媒体的表现可能会放大误解。例如,一个声称“新研究证明饮食X导致减肥”的标题,可能并未准确反映研究的结论,尤其是如果该关系是以微弱的方式建立的。以微弱的结论为基础的影响超越了学术界和新闻界;它们可能会影响政策制定和公众认知。政策制定者通常依赖研究来指导他们的决策,但如果基础研究是基于微弱的数据连接,那么产生的政策可能会出现缺陷。这在公共卫生等领域尤其令人担忧,因为基于不可靠证据的决策可能会影响数百万人的生活。因此,研究人员和记者都必须认真评估他们所做连接的强度,并传达与其发现相关的确定性程度。此外,观众也有责任以批判的心态看待科学主张。在信息随时可得的时代,个人必须辨别研究的可靠性和那些以微弱的方式提出的主张之间的区别。参与科学需要一定的怀疑精神,理解并非所有研究都是平等的。读者在接受结论之前,应考虑方法论、样本大小以及研究所进行的背景。总之,虽然追求知识是一项崇高的事业,但至关重要的是认识到何时结论是以微弱的方式得出的。通过在研究中培养严格审查的文化,以及在媒体中负责任的传播,我们可以确保传递给公众的信息是可靠和有效的。只有这样,我们才能希望建立一个基于坚实证据而非微弱联系做出明智决策的社会。挑战不仅在于进行研究,还在于确保我们所做的连接是稳固且有根基的,从而为真正造福人类的进步铺平道路。