Monroe Doctrine

简明释义

门罗主义

英英释义

例句

1.Many historians argue that the Monroe Doctrine set the stage for future U.S. interventions in Latin America.

许多历史学家认为，门罗主义为未来美国在拉丁美洲的干预奠定了基础。

2.The essence of the Monroe Doctrine is to prevent European powers from colonizing further in the Americas.

门罗主义的本质是防止欧洲列强在美洲进一步殖民。

3.During the Cold War, the principles of the Monroe Doctrine were invoked to justify U.S. actions in Cuba.

在冷战期间，门罗主义的原则被引用来为美国在古巴的行动辩护。

4.The implementation of the Monroe Doctrine was a significant moment in American foreign policy.

实施门罗主义是美国外交政策中的一个重要时刻。

5.The Monroe Doctrine has been interpreted in various ways by different administrations throughout history.

历史上，不同的政府对门罗主义有不同的解读。

作文

The Monroe Doctrine was a pivotal policy in the history of American foreign relations, articulated by President James Monroe in 1823. This doctrine was primarily aimed at countering European colonialism in the Americas. At its core, the Monroe Doctrine asserted that any intervention by external powers in the politics of the Americas would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States. This was a bold statement, reflecting the growing confidence of the young nation and its desire to assert its influence over the Western Hemisphere.The context surrounding the formulation of the Monroe Doctrine is critical to understanding its significance. In the early 19th century, many Latin American countries were gaining independence from Spanish rule. The United States was concerned that European nations, particularly Spain and France, might attempt to reclaim their former colonies or establish new ones in the region. The Monroe Doctrine was thus intended to protect these newly independent nations and ensure that the Americas remained free from European colonization.In essence, the Monroe Doctrine can be seen as a declaration of the Western Hemisphere's autonomy. It marked a clear division between the Old World, represented by Europe, and the New World, represented by the Americas. The doctrine stated that the Americas were no longer open to colonization and that any attempt by European powers to extend their influence would be met with resistance from the United States.The impact of the Monroe Doctrine was profound and far-reaching. It laid the groundwork for future U.S. foreign policy in Latin America, establishing a precedent for American intervention in the region. Over the years, the doctrine was invoked to justify various actions, including military interventions and diplomatic maneuvers. For instance, during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the United States used the Monroe Doctrine to justify its involvement in Caribbean affairs, often under the guise of protecting smaller nations from European influence.However, the Monroe Doctrine was not without its critics. Some argued that it represented an imperialistic stance, allowing the United States to impose its will on its neighbors under the pretense of protection. Critics pointed out that the doctrine often led to the suppression of legitimate movements for independence or reform in Latin America, as the U.S. prioritized its strategic interests over the sovereignty of other nations.In modern times, the relevance of the Monroe Doctrine has evolved. While the doctrine itself is not formally recognized in contemporary international law, its principles continue to resonate in U.S. foreign policy discussions. The idea of American influence in the Western Hemisphere remains a contentious topic, especially in the context of rising powers such as China and Russia seeking to expand their presence in Latin America.In conclusion, the Monroe Doctrine represents a significant chapter in the narrative of American foreign policy. It encapsulates the United States' historical desire to assert its dominance in the Western Hemisphere while simultaneously promoting the independence of neighboring nations. Understanding the Monroe Doctrine is essential for grasping the complexities of U.S.-Latin American relations and the ongoing debates surrounding American interventionism and sovereignty in the region.

《门罗主义》是美国对外关系历史上一个重要的政策，由詹姆斯·门罗总统在1823年提出。该主义主要旨在抵制欧洲在美洲的殖民活动。在其核心，门罗主义宣称，任何外部势力干预美洲政治的行为将被视为对美国的敌对行为。这一声明反映了年轻国家日益增长的自信心及其希望在西半球主张影响力的愿望。形成门罗主义的背景对于理解其重要性至关重要。在19世纪初，许多拉丁美洲国家正在摆脱西班牙统治而获得独立。美国担心欧洲国家，特别是西班牙和法国，可能会试图重新占领它们曾经的殖民地或在该地区建立新的殖民地。因此，门罗主义旨在保护这些新独立的国家，并确保美洲不再受到欧洲殖民。从本质上讲，门罗主义可以看作是对西半球自主权的声明。它标志着旧世界（以欧洲为代表）与新世界（以美洲为代表）之间的明确分界。该主义声明，美洲不再开放给殖民，任何欧洲势力试图扩展其影响力的行为都将遭到美国的抵制。门罗主义的影响深远且广泛。它为未来美国在拉丁美洲的外交政策奠定了基础，确立了美国在该地区干预的先例。多年来，该主义被用来为各种行动辩护，包括军事干预和外交手段。例如，在19世纪末和20世纪初，美国利用门罗主义为其介入加勒比事务辩护，通常以保护小国免受欧洲影响的名义。然而，门罗主义并非没有批评者。有些人认为，它代表了一种帝国主义立场，使美国能够以保护的名义对邻国施加意志。批评者指出，该主义往往导致对独立或改革的合法运动的压制，因为美国优先考虑其战略利益，而非其他国家的主权。在现代，门罗主义的相关性已经演变。虽然该主义本身在当代国际法中并未正式认可，但其原则在美国外交政策讨论中仍然引起共鸣。美国在西半球的影响力这一观点仍然是一个有争议的话题，特别是在中国和俄罗斯等崛起大国寻求扩大在拉丁美洲存在的背景下。总之，门罗主义代表了美国外交政策叙述中的一个重要章节。它概括了美国历史上希望在西半球主张主导地位的愿望，同时促进邻国的独立。理解门罗主义对于掌握美拉关系的复杂性以及围绕美国干预主义和该地区主权的持续辩论至关重要。